Presented by Dr. Roman Saini
Directive Principles of State
Policy 4.2
About me
• IAS, Doctor and trying to be a good teacher
• If you want to know more, you can read online.
• Spread the word ...
24th CAA, 1971
• Passed to reverse Golaknath case decision. Parliament wants to give
effect to preamble and DPSP, but SC t...
25th CAA, 1971
• The parliament in order to overcome the obstruction in enactment of social
legislation passed the 25th CA...
• V.G. Ramachandran described the 24th and 25th Amendments as:
• not merely 'tinkering' with the Constitution.
• But it is...
FR<DPSP
24 April, 1973
Kesavananda Bharati
v. State of Kerala,1973
• There are certain principles within the framework of Indian Constitution
which are inviolable and hence cannot be amende...
• Landmark decision of SC (wafer thin margin: 7-6) that outlined the Basic
Structure doctrine of the Constitution.
• On ba...
Basic structure doctrine
• Preamble objectives:
• Secularism, Rule of law,
• Sovereign, Democratic, Republican structure,
...
• Judiciary:
• Judicial Review, limitations upon the amending power conferred
by Article 368
• Independence of the Judicia...
• Miscellaneous :
• The principle of Separation of Powers
• Federalism
• The Parliamentary system of government
• The prin...
• 42nd CA Act, 1976 amended Article 31-C:
• enacted during emergency (25 June 1975 – 21 March 1977) aka
mini constitution
...
FR<<<<DPSP
• The 44th
CA act 1978, has removed Art 31 (Right to Property) from list of FR.
• The SC in Minnerva Mills v/s UOI, 1980 c...
FR>DPSP
Exception:
14, 19 can be
neglected for
39(b),(c)
Sanctions behind DPSP
• Constitution itself
• Public opinion
• Utility of Directive principles
• Constitutional amendments...
Spread the word and help those who cannot afford coaching
www.facebook.com/romansaini.official
Tweet
@RomanSaini
Polity dpsp 4.2
of 21

Polity dpsp 4.2

dpsp
Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Published in: Education      
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - Polity dpsp 4.2

  • 1. Presented by Dr. Roman Saini Directive Principles of State Policy 4.2
  • 2. About me • IAS, Doctor and trying to be a good teacher • If you want to know more, you can read online. • Spread the word of this education revolution. • Any query or doubt, please comment below the video on youtube or on Facebook page: www.facebook.com/romansaini.official
  • 3. 24th CAA, 1971 • Passed to reverse Golaknath case decision. Parliament wants to give effect to preamble and DPSP, but SC took it all away. • Declared that the Parliament has the power to abridge or take away any of the FRs by enacting CAAs • Article 13 is not applicable (NA) to any amendment made under Art 368 • Prez shall give his assent to CAA after being passed from both houses. • Article 368 includes both amendment of the process and procedure thereof
  • 4. 25th CAA, 1971 • The parliament in order to overcome the obstruction in enactment of social legislation passed the 25th CAA, 1971 • Decreased the scope of the right to property to a large extent as it permitted the acquisition of private property by the government for public use, on the payment of compensation (determined by Parliament, not courts) • Introduced article 31-C: if the state enacted any law giving effect to two art under 39 (b) and (c) and in the process if the law violate the FR given under Art 14,19 or 31, the law shall not be declared as unconstitutional (N&V) merely on this ground. • Any declaration made by state that the law is to give effect to Art 39 (b) and (c) cannot be challenged in court of law.
  • 5. • V.G. Ramachandran described the 24th and 25th Amendments as: • not merely 'tinkering' with the Constitution. • But it is a veritable slaughter of the Constitution. • 25th Amendment "smacks of totalitarianism and hurry to achieve socialism instantly overnight”. • Thus for first time, 2 directives given under act 39 (b) and (c) were given precedence over 3 FR given under act 14,19 and 31.
  • 6. FR<DPSP
  • 7. 24 April, 1973
  • 8. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala,1973
  • 9. • There are certain principles within the framework of Indian Constitution which are inviolable and hence cannot be amended by the Parliament. These principles are commonly termed as Basic Structure • Parliament has "wide" powers, it did not have the power to destroy or emasculate the basic elements or fundamental features of the constitution • Section 2(a) and 2(b), and the first part of section 3 of the 25th Amendment were upheld by the SC as valid. • However, the second part of section 3, which prevented judicial review of any law that gives effect to DPSP, was declared unconstitutional
  • 10. • Landmark decision of SC (wafer thin margin: 7-6) that outlined the Basic Structure doctrine of the Constitution. • On basis of 25th CA act the Bank Nationalisation Act and Privy Purses (abolition) Act were held to be constitutionally valid by SC when they were re-enacted • This judgement has gained widespread acceptance and legitimacy due to subsequent cases and judgments • Kesavananda Bharathi is the case which saved Indian democracy; thanks to Shri Kesavananda Bharati, eminent jurist Nanabhoy Palkhivala and the seven judges who were in the majority. -TheHindu, in April 2013, on the occasion of the 40th Anniversary
  • 11. Basic structure doctrine • Preamble objectives: • Secularism, Rule of law, • Sovereign, Democratic, Republican structure, • Unity and integrity of the Nation, • Freedom and dignity of the individual • Constitution: Supremacy, Articles 32 and 226, ”essence" of other FRs Part III, Part IV DPSP (concept of social and economic justice, to build a Welfare State), Balance between Part III and IV
  • 12. • Judiciary: • Judicial Review, limitations upon the amending power conferred by Article 368 • Independence of the Judiciary • The principle of equality, mainly the quintessence of equal justice; • Effective access to justice • Powers of the Supreme Court under Articles 32, 136, 141, 142
  • 13. • Miscellaneous : • The principle of Separation of Powers • Federalism • The Parliamentary system of government • The principle of free and fair elections • Legislation seeking to nullify the awards made in exercise of the judicial power of the State by Arbitration Tribunals constituted under an Act
  • 14. • 42nd CA Act, 1976 amended Article 31-C: • enacted during emergency (25 June 1975 – 21 March 1977) aka mini constitution • If the state enacted any law giving effect to all or any of DPSP and if in the process, the law violated FR given U/A 14, 19 and 31, the law shall not be declared as unconstitutional and void merely on this ground. • Thus the 42nd CA act attempted to give precedence for all the DPSP over 3 FR given under act 14, 19 and 31.
  • 15. FR<<<<DPSP
  • 16. • The 44th CA act 1978, has removed Art 31 (Right to Property) from list of FR. • The SC in Minnerva Mills v/s UOI, 1980 case held the changes introduced by 42nd CA act (section 4 and 55) in Art 31-C as unconstitutional and void on the ground that it disturbed balance b/w part III and IV of constitution and that the balance b/w them is part of basic structure of constitution. • No absolute power of Part III and Part IV over each other • Goals set out by the DPSP have to be achieved without the abrogation of the means provided by the Fundamental Rights • Power of parliament to amend constitution is limited and it cannot amend constitution to make this power unlimited
  • 17. FR>DPSP
  • 18. Exception: 14, 19 can be neglected for 39(b),(c)
  • 19. Sanctions behind DPSP • Constitution itself • Public opinion • Utility of Directive principles • Constitutional amendments • Laws made by the government • Executive orders
  • 20. Spread the word and help those who cannot afford coaching www.facebook.com/romansaini.official Tweet @RomanSaini