Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1
NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores
2006-2014
Core Area Grades...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg
Grade 3 87...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3
NJASK Language Arts & Literacy
Core Study Area Score Averages 20...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
...
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3%
2 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8%
3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%
4 Ringw...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%
2 Kinnelon 87...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5%
2 Oakland 81...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8
2014 Kinnelon 87.2% 2014 Oakland 89.8% 2014 Ringwood 98.5%
2013 ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9
-10.0%
-9.0%
-8.0%
-7.0%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10
-90% -80% -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11
2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3
1 Kinnel...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12
2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 5
1 Ringwo...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13
2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 2010 Gr. 4
1 Oaklan...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14
2014 Kinnelon 11.3%
2013 Oakland 19.9%
2012 Pequannock 25.0%
20...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15
Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK LAL Score Changes
Blo...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap ©s 2015 Carole J.
Rafferty 16
NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores
2006-2014
Comparative Di...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg
Grade 3 80.5% ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18
Comparison School District Score Averages 2006-2014
NJASK Langu...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20
NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21
NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22
2011 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 90.3% 86.7% 88.2%
2 Franklin L...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23
2014 Tenafly 92.9%
2013 Tenafly 88.3%
2012 Tenafly 88.5%
2011 T...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
2014
...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25
-60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%
2014
Gr. 4
2013
Gr....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26
2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3
Franklin...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27
2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4
1 Margate City 17.0...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28
2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5
1 Margate City 16.2...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
1...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30
Jefferson
Twp Totowa
Franklin
Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventn...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015
Carole J. Rafferty
31
Narrowing the Achievement Gap
Fourth Grade Data
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32
Total Core
Area
Average
Total CD
Area
Average
Comparison
to CD
...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33
NJASK 4th Grade Literacy and Language Arts Comparsion 2006-2013...
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total Core Area ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35
New Jersey NJASK LAL Averages - Grade 4
Below Basic Basic Profi...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100....
NJASK 4th Grade Enrollment Comparsion 2006-2011
Core Grade 4
Enrollment Avg.
Comparative
Distr. Grade
4 Enrollment
Avg.
Co...
NJASK 4th Grade Class Size Comparsion 2006-2011
Total Core
Area Gr 4
Score
Average
Total CD
Area Gr 4
Score
Average
Compar...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 39
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 40
SAT
Verbal Scores
TOWNS Core
Towns Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Riverdale
Pompton
Lks Oakland Wanaque Ringwood West Milford Lincoln Park Peq...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 42
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
20132012201120102009200820072006
SAT ...
SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013
ButlerH.S. KinnelonH.S.
IndianHills
RHS WestMilfordH.S. BoontonH.S.
PequannockTWP
HS WayneHill...
SAT Verbal Rankings by School 2006-2013
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Butler H.S. 495 503 498 498 507 494 488 48...
SAT Verbal Rankings 2006-2013
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Atlantic City H.S. 429 432 434 430 421 441 432 423
B...
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Tenafly H.S.
Ramapo H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Pequannock Twp RHS
Wayn...
SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1 Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tena...
Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School
District
SAT
Participation
Pequannock 94.8%
Kinnelon 94.0%
Tenafly 94.0...
Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School District
SAT
Participation
School
District
SAT
Participation
School
Dis...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 50
Narrowing the Achievement Gap
General Literacy Data
NJASK English-Speaking Students
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010...
NJASK English-Speaking Students
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010...
NJASK English-Speaking Students
Core Average
Comparative
District
Average
Total English
2006 89.0% 73.9% 83.4%
2007 89.5% ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015
Carole J. Rafferty
54
of 54

NAG_LAL

Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - NAG_LAL

  • 1. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1 NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014 Core Area Grades 3 through 5
  • 2. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2 Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Grade 3 87.1% 89.5% 92.4% 69.8% 67.9% 70.6% 77.9% 73.0% 75.6% 78.5% Grade 4 87.7% 86.0% 88.2% 73.4% 69.6% 74.6% 66.9% 69.2% 73.3% 76.9% Grade 5 93.9% 93.9% 66.9% 78.3% 72.1% 71.5% 72.4% 71.8% 70.8% 77.6% Includes: Bloomingdale, Butler, Kinnelon, Lincoln Park, Oakland, Pequannock, Pompton Lakes, Ringwood, Riverdale, Wanaque, West Milford, and Wayne 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014 Suburban Trends Area
  • 3. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3 NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Core Study Area Score Averages 2006-2014 School District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequannock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Total Area Average 2014 Gr. 3 74.4% 57.9% 87.2% 81.7% 81.6% 86.0% 74.0% 67.5% 84.0% 68.0% 70.3% 74.5% 75.6% Gr. 4 52.7% 67.5% 80.6% 65.8% 89.8% 78.0% 67.0% 73.0% 70.0% 71.5% 73.9% 69.5% 73.3% Gr. 5 70.8% 59.1% 75.9% 69.2% 87.1% 79.0% 71.0% 72.0% 64.0% 65.0% 67.6% 69.3% 70.8% 2013 Gr. 3 67.0% 54.0% 88.0% 72.0% 81.7% 86.0% 74.0% 67.5% 84.0% 68.0% 70.3% 74.5% 73.9% Gr. 4 60.0% 62.0% 76.0% 59.0% 76.3% 78.0% 67.0% 73.0% 70.0% 71.5% 73.9% 69.5% 70.6% Gr. 5 60.0% 71.0% 84.0% 76.0% 88.0% 79.0% 71.0% 72.0% 64.0% 65.0% 67.6% 69.3% 73.4% 2012 Gr. 3 78.0% 53.0% 81.0% 89.0% 90.3% 88.7% 71.0% 83.0% 71.0% 74.0% 83.3% 72.8% 77.9% Gr. 4 57.0% 41.0% 66.0% 69.0% 82.3% 76.0% 67.0% 65.0% 74.0% 72.0% 59.8% 67.2% Gr. 5 73.0% 61.0% 89.0% 84.0% 86.3% 83.3% 71.0% 64.0% 55.0% 57.5% 72.4% 69.3% 72.1% 2011 Gr. 3 60.2% 53.2% 84.8% 72.9% 86.9% 79.8% 66.6% 69.1% 67.8% 66.2% 71.3% 61.5% 70.9% Gr. 4 56.4% 60.8% 84.1% 86.3% 89.2% 81.5% 74.3% 70.4% 82.2% 52.9% 73.7% 73.7% 75.4% Gr. 5 67.6% 64.7% 82.7% 73.8% 81.2% 80.2% 60.7% 73.9% 71.4% 51.9% 69.2% 71.7% 71.0% 2010 Gr. 3 60.3% 57.2% 81.2% 83.8% 83.1% 80.2% 71.0% 71.0% 56.0% 51.4% 65.8% 67.5% 69.8% Gr. 4 47.9% 70.1% 82.7% 80.5% 81.4% 83.5% 72.9% 72.9% 60.7% 53.8% 69.2% 71.1% 72.6% Gr. 5 65.3% 60.3% 79.6% 82.2% 91.2% 86.9% 70.1% 70.1% 61.3% 55.2% 69.6% 73.1% 72.7% 2009 Gr. 3 45.2% 54.4% 80.0% 77.5% 83.5% 86.3% 61.8% 74.1% 79.3% 55.1% 70.2% 70.2% 72.0% Gr. 4 66.2% 66.3% 74.6% 73.3% 90.7% 87.8% 69.5% 69.7% 81.3% 51.9% 75.7% 74.1% 74.1% Gr. 5 62.5% 66.7% 89.9% 88.6% 89.8% 89.0% 79.1% 73.8% 79.4% 62.6% 76.2% 82.5% 79.8% 2008 Gr. 3 94.0% 93.2% 93.3% 97.6% 94.8% 96.3% 86.7% 94.2% 88.9% 86.6% 93.0% 90.2% 92.3% Gr. 4 84.8% 85.0% 94.5% 89.8% 92.4% 94.4% 85.5% 87.8% 87.1% 77.9% 91.1% 88.1% 88.5% Gr. 5 51.6% 46.3% 84.6% 78.3% 86.4% 79.8% 70.4% 57.5% 63.3% 41.4% 71.8% 71.5% 68.3% 2007 Gr. 3 75.9% 83.8% 96.9% 89.0% 95.8% 93.9% 92.3% 91.9% 90.0% 84.0% 89.3% 91.2% 90.7% Gr. 4 83.8% 76.1% 92.1% 94.9% 94.9% 94.0% 91.9% 82.0% 68.7% 73.9% 89.9% 89.5% 86.2% Gr. 5 78.9% 87.9% 96.4% 96.2% 98.4% 97.0% 95.7% 94.1% 96.5% 94.9% 95.7% 95.1% 95.3% 2006 Gr. 3 68.8% 82.4% 94.1% 93.1% 95.5% 91.1% 91.1% 84.0% 80.0% 83.1% 91.0% 91.3% 88.8% Gr. 4 79.9% 83.1% 93.2% 90.4% 97.1% 88.6% 94.7% 84.9% 82.7% 80.9% 89.4% 87.6% 88.4% Gr. 5 92.7% 90.0% 98.9% 90.4% 96.9% 96.6% 94.3% 93.5% 100.0% 81.7% 94.4% 96.3% 93.9%
  • 4. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 88.8% 88.4% 93.9% 90.7% 86.2% 95.3% 92.3% 88.5% 68.3% 72.0% 74.1% 79.8% 69.8% 72.6%72.7% 70.9% 75.4% 71.0% 77.9% 67.2% 72.1% 73.9% 70.6% 73.4% 77.6% 69.5% 72.6% NJASK LAL Core Study Averages by Grade
  • 5. 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3% 2 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8% 3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 4 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5% 5 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6% 6 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6% 7 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3% 8 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8% 9 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5% 10 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3% 11 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4% 12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 2 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0% 3 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3% 4 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4% 5 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0% 6 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0% 7 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0% 8 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5% 9 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3% 10 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0% 11 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0% 12 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9% 2 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4% 3 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2% 4 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 5 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5% 6 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5% 7 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4% 8 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6% 9 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2% 10 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8% 11 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4% 12 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0% 2 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0% 3 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0% 4 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 5 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3% 6 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0% 7 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0% 8 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6% 9 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0% 10 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0% 11 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 12 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 2 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7% 3 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2% 4 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8% 5 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2% 6 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9% 7 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4% 8 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7% 9 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9% 10 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7% 11 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6% 12 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2% 2 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 3 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6% 4 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9% 5 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 6 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 7 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1% 8 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6% 9 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3% 10 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3% 11 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3% 12 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0% 2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 3 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9% 4 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4% 5 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6% 6 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8% 7 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2% 8 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5% 9 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 10 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6% 11 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7% 12 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4% 2 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 3 Pequannock 96.4% 93.5% 97.4% 4 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7% 5 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1% 6 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1% 7 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5% 8 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7% 9 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2% 10 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9% 11 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9% 12 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 2 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9% 3 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4% 4 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 5 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3% 6 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6% 7 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4% 8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5% 9 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7% 10 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0% 11 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0% 12 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% NJASK Core Area LAL Rankings by Year - Grade 3
  • 6. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 2 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9% 3 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4% 4 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6% 5 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1% 6 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5% 7 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4% 8 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2% 9 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5% 10 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2% 11 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8% 12 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0% 2 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 3 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0% 4 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6% 5 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0% 6 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0% 7 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0% 8 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3% 9 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0% 10 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0% 11 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 12 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 2 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3% 3 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5% 4 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4% 5 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0% 6 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0% 7 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0% 8 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0% 9 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3% 10 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0% 11 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0% 12 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 2 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8% 3 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7% 4 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4% 5 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2% 6 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7% 7 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7% 8 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2% 9 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9% 10 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7% 11 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6% 12 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9% 2 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6% 3 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 4 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2% 5 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 6 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 7 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1% 8 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3% 9 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6% 10 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3% 11 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2% 12 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 2 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0% 3 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4% 4 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2% 5 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9% 6 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5% 7 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6% 8 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8% 9 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 10 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7% 11 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5% 12 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6% 2 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8% 3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 4 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8% 5 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3% 6 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5% 7 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5% 8 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3% 9 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4% 10 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3% 11 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6% 12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 2 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2% 3 Pequannock 92.4% 94.9% 97.3% 4 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4% 5 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7% 6 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7% 7 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1% 8 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9% 9 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1% 10 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9% 11 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9% 12 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 2 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3% 3 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9% 4 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4% 5 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4% 6 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6% 7 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5% 9 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0% 10 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0% 11 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7% 12 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% NJASK Core Area LAL Rankings by Year - Grade 4
  • 7. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5% 2 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 3 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4% 4 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9% 5 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6% 6 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4% 7 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8% 8 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2% 9 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5% 10 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2% 11 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1% 12 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 2 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0% 3 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0% 4 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0% 5 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0% 6 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0% 7 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0% 8 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3% 9 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6% 10 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0% 11 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0% 12 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0% 2 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 3 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0% 4 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3% 5 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0% 6 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4% 7 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0% 8 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3% 9 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0% 10 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0% 11 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5% 12 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7% 2 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 3 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2% 4 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9% 5 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8% 6 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7% 7 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4% 8 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2% 9 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6% 10 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7% 11 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7% 12 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 2 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9% 3 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2% 4 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6% 5 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1% 6 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 7 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1% 8 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6% 9 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3% 10 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3% 11 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3% 12 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9% 2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 3 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0% 4 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6% 5 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5% 6 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4% 7 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 8 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2% 9 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8% 10 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7% 11 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6% 12 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 2 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6% 3 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8% 4 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3% 5 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8% 6 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5% 7 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4% 8 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3% 9 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5% 10 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6% 11 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3% 12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 2 Pequannock 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 3 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5% 4 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4% 5 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2% 6 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7% 7 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7% 8 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1% 9 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9% 10 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1% 11 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9% 12 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0% 2 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9% 3 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 4 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6% 5 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 6 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4% 7 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3% 8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5% 9 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% 10 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4% 11 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0% 12 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7% NJASK Core Area LAL Rankings by Year - Grade 5
  • 8. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8 2014 Kinnelon 87.2% 2014 Oakland 89.8% 2014 Ringwood 98.5% 2013 Kinnelon 88.0% 2013 Pequannock 78.0% 2013 Oakland 88.0% 2012 Oakland 90.3% 2012 Oakland 82.3% 2012 Kinnelon 89.0% 2011 Oakland 86.9% 2011 Oakland 89.2% 2011 Kinnelon 82.7% 2010 Lincoln Park 83.8% 2010 Pequannock 83.5% 2010 Oakland 91.2% 2009 Pequannock 86.3% 2009 Oakland 90.7% 2009 Kinnelon 89.9% 2008 Lincoln Park 97.6% 2008 Kinnelon 94.5% 2008 Oakland 86.4% 2007 Kinnelon 96.9% 2007 Oakland 94.9% 2007 Oakland 98.4% 2006 Oakland 95.5% 2006 Oakland 97.1% 2006 Riverdale 100.0% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% KinnelonKinnelonOaklandOaklandLincoln ParkPequannockLincoln ParkKinnelonOakland 201420132012201120102009200820072006 87.2% 88.0% 90.3% 86.9% 83.8% 86.3% 97.6% 96.9% 95.5% Core Area Grade 3 First Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% OaklandPequannockOaklandOaklandPequannockOaklandKinnelonOaklandOakland 201420132012201120102009200820072006 89.8% 78.0% 82.3% 89.2% 83.5% 90.7% 94.5% 94.9% 97.1% Core Area Grade 4 First-Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% RingwoodOaklandKinnelonKinnelonOaklandKinnelonOaklandOaklandRiverdale 201420132012201120102009200820072006 98.5% 88.0% 89.0% 82.7% 91.2% 89.9% 86.4% 98.4% 100.0% Core Area Grade 5 First-Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Core Area LAL First-Place Rankings by Year
  • 9. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9 -10.0% -9.0% -8.0% -7.0% -6.0% -5.0% -4.0% -3.0% -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 2.5% -0.8% 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% -0.1% -2.0% -0.4% 3.2% -1.8% 0.0% 2.7% -2.3% -1.5% 0.4% -9.4% -1.6% 0.7% -5.1% -7.4% -2.7% 0.6% -1.1% -4.0% -1.4% -3.3% -1.6% NJASK Core Area Study LAL Score Change by Percent
  • 10. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10 -90% -80% -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 2010 Gr. 4 2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4 Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK LAL Score Changes by Percent Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford
  • 11. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11 2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3 1 Kinnelon 11.3% 1 Oakland 19.9% 1 Pequannock 25.0% 1 Oakland 17.7% 1 Oakland 12.6% 2 Pequannock 8.9% 2 Pequannock 13.0% 2 Oakland 24.9% 2 Lincoln Park 10.7% 2 Lincoln Park 9.5% 3 Lincoln Park 5.8% 3 Lincoln Park 6.9% 3 Wayne 5.4% 3 Wanaque 10.7% 3 Wanaque 9.5% 4 Oakland 5.6% 4 Wanaque 6.9% 4 West Milford 5.1% 4 West Milford 9.4% 4 Pequannock 3.1% 5 Pompton Lakes 4.7% 5 West Milford -0.6% 5 Bloomingdale 0.1% 5 Pequannock 7.0% 5 West Milford 2.3% 6 Ringwood 3.4% 6 Wayne -3.6% 6 Pompton Lakes 0.1% 6 Wayne 0.4% 6 Kinnelon -3.1% 7 West Milford 2.8% 7 Bloomingdale -6.9% 7 Lincoln Park -0.1% 7 Kinnelon -7.0% 7 Riverdale -3.1% 8 Wayne 2.5% 8 Pompton Lakes -6.9% 8 Wanaque -0.1% 8 Riverdale -7.0% 8 Wayne -4.0% 9 Riverdale -0.2% 9 Kinnelon -13.0% 9 Butler -24.9% 9 Bloomingdale -10.7% 9 Bloomingdale -9.5% 10 Bloomingdale -1.5% 10 Riverdale -13.0% 10 Ringwood -24.9% 10 Pompton Lakes -10.7% 10 Pompton Lakes -9.5% 11 Wanaque -2.5% 11 Butler -19.9% 11 Kinnelon -25.0% 11 Butler -17.7% 11 Butler -12.6% 12 Butler -18.0% 12 Ringwood -19.9% 12 Riverdale -25.0% 12 Ringwood -17.7% 12 Ringwood -12.6% 2009 Gr. 3 2008 Gr. 3 2007 Gr. 3 2006 Gr. 3 1 Lincoln Park 26.8% 1 West Milford 2.0% 1 Lincoln Park 14.8% 1 Lincoln Park 20.0% 2 Wanaque 26.8% 2 Bloomingdale 1.7% 2 Wanaque 14.8% 2 Wanaque 20.0% 3 Oakland 17.6% 3 Pompton Lakes 1.7% 3 Kinnelon 7.9% 3 Kinnelon 13.6% 4 Kinnelon 9.2% 4 Butler 0.9% 4 Riverdale 7.9% 4 Riverdale 13.6% 5 Riverdale 9.2% 5 Ringwood 0.9% 5 Oakland 6.9% 5 Oakland 6.4% 6 West Milford 1.8% 6 Pequannock 0.8% 6 West Milford -0.4% 6 Wayne 2.2% 7 Wayne -1.8% 7 Wayne 0.7% 7 Wayne -1.4% 7 West Milford -2.5% 8 Pequannock -9.2% 8 Kinnelon -0.8% 8 Butler -6.9% 8 Butler -6.4% 9 Butler -17.6% 9 Riverdale -0.8% 9 Ringwood -6.9% 9 Ringwood -6.4% 10 Ringwood -17.6% 10 Oakland -0.9% 10 Pequannock -7.9% 10 Pequannock -13.6% 11 Bloomingdale -26.8% 11 Lincoln Park -1.7% 11 Bloomingdale -14.8% 11 Bloomingdale -20.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -26.8% 12 Wanaque -1.7% 12 Pompton Lakes -14.8% 12 Pompton Lakes -20.0% NJASK Core Area LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 3
  • 12. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12 2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 5 1 Ringwood 27.6% 1 Lincoln Park 13.4% 1 Pequannock 12.0% 1 Oakland 6.3% 1 Oakland 12.4% 2 Oakland 16.2% 2 Wanaque 13.4% 2 Oakland 11.1% 2 Lincoln Park 3.4% 2 Lincoln Park 7.4% 3 Pequannock 6.8% 3 Kinnelon 11.0% 3 West Milford 2.7% 3 Wanaque 3.4% 3 Wanaque 7.4% 4 Kinnelon 5.0% 4 Riverdale 11.0% 4 Bloomingdale 0.9% 4 Pequannock 2.9% 4 Pequannock 5.0% 5 Wayne 1.8% 5 West Milford 4.0% 5 Pompton Lakes 0.9% 5 West Milford -0.7% 5 West Milford -0.4% 6 West Milford 1.6% 6 Oakland 2.4% 6 Wayne 0.3% 6 Wayne -1.8% 6 Wayne -3.1% 7 Bloomingdale -0.1% 7 Butler -2.4% 7 Lincoln Park -0.9% 7 Kinnelon -2.9% 7 Kinnelon -5.0% 8 Lincoln Park -1.7% 8 Ringwood -2.4% 8 Wanaque -0.9% 8 Riverdale -2.9% 8 Riverdale -5.0% 9 Pompton Lakes -5.4% 9 Wayne -5.8% 9 Butler -11.1% 9 Bloomingdale -3.4% 9 Bloomingdale -7.4% 10 Riverdale -8.7% 10 Pequannock -11.0% 10 Ringwood -11.1% 10 Pompton Lakes -3.4% 10 Pompton Lakes -7.4% 11 Butler -11.8% 11 Bloomingdale -13.4% 11 Kinnelon -12.0% 11 Butler -6.3% 11 Butler -12.4% 12 Wanaque -12.5% 12 Pompton Lakes -13.4% 12 Riverdale -12.0% 12 Ringwood -6.3% 12 Ringwood -12.4% 2009 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 5 2006 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 17.3% 1 Oakland 22.0% 1 Lincoln Park 16.4% 1 Oakland 3.9% 2 Wanaque 17.3% 2 Lincoln Park 16.7% 2 Wanaque 16.4% 2 Pequannock 2.7% 3 Oakland 13.1% 3 Wanaque 16.7% 3 Kinnelon 9.0% 3 Lincoln Park 1.2% 4 Kinnelon 4.2% 4 Pequannock 5.3% 4 Riverdale 9.0% 4 Wanaque 1.2% 5 Riverdale 4.2% 5 Wayne 3.5% 5 Oakland 7.4% 5 Wayne 0.5% 6 West Milford -2.7% 6 West Milford -3.2% 6 Wayne 0.4% 6 Bloomingdale -1.2% 7 Wayne -3.6% 7 Kinnelon -5.3% 7 West Milford 0.1% 7 Pompton Lakes -1.2% 8 Pequannock -4.2% 8 Riverdale -5.3% 8 Butler -7.4% 8 West Milford -2.4% 9 Butler -13.1% 9 Bloomingdale -16.7% 9 Ringwood -7.4% 9 Kinnelon -2.7% 10 Ringwood -13.1% 10 Pompton Lakes -16.7% 10 Pequannock -9.0% 10 Riverdale -2.7% 11 Bloomingdale -17.3% 11 Butler -22.0% 11 Bloomingdale -16.4% 11 Butler -3.9% 12 Pompton Lakes -17.3% 12 Ringwood -22.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -16.4% 12 Ringwood -3.9% NJASK Core Area LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 4
  • 13. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13 2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 2010 Gr. 4 1 Oakland 17.0% 1 Lincoln Park 10.6% 1 Oakland 26.2% 1 Lincoln Park 19.0% 1 Lincoln Park 24.7% 2 Kinnelon 7.8% 2 Wanaque 10.6% 2 Pequannock 16.0% 2 Wanaque 19.0% 2 Wanaque 24.7% 3 Pequannock 4.0% 3 Oakland 8.6% 3 Lincoln Park 10.2% 3 Oakland 14.6% 3 Kinnelon 22.2% 4 Wayne -3.8% 4 Wayne 3.3% 4 Riverdale 10.2% 4 Kinnelon 4.4% 4 Riverdale 22.2% 5 Butler -5.3% 5 Kinnelon 2.0% 5 Wanaque 10.2% 5 Riverdale 4.4% 5 Oakland 2.5% 6 Ringwood -6.3% 6 Riverdale 2.0% 6 West Milford 7.4% 6 West Milford 1.6% 6 West Milford 1.5% 7 Lincoln Park -7.0% 7 West Milford 1.1% 7 Wayne 4.8% 7 Wayne -1.7% 7 Butler -2.5% 8 West Milford -7.4% 8 Pequannock -2.0% 8 Bloomingdale -10.2% 8 Pequannock -4.4% 8 Ringwood -2.5% 9 Pompton Lakes -8.5% 9 Butler -8.6% 9 Pompton Lakes -10.2% 9 Butler -14.6% 9 Wayne -3.4% 10 Riverdale -8.9% 10 Ringwood -8.6% 10 Kinnelon -16.0% 10 Ringwood -14.6% 10 Pequannock -22.2% 11 Bloomingdale -20.1% 11 Bloomingdale -10.6% 11 Butler -26.2% 11 Bloomingdale -19.0% 11 Bloomingdale -24.7% 12 Wanaque -20.8% 12 Pompton Lakes -10.6% 12 Ringwood 12 Pompton Lakes -19.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -24.7% 2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4 1 Lincoln Park 7.9% 1 Lincoln Park 3.7% 1 Oakland 10.1% 1 Lincoln Park 8.5% 2 Wanaque 7.9% 2 Wanaque 3.7% 2 Pequannock 7.7% 2 Wanaque 8.5% 3 Oakland 7.8% 3 Oakland 3.5% 3 Wayne 3.7% 3 Oakland 5.3% 4 Wayne 1.6% 4 Wayne 2.6% 4 Lincoln Park 2.4% 4 Kinnelon 3.2% 5 Kinnelon 0.1% 5 West Milford 0.4% 5 Wanaque 2.4% 5 Riverdale 3.2% 6 Riverdale 0.1% 6 Kinnelon 0.2% 6 Bloomingdale -2.4% 6 Wayne 1.0% 7 West Milford 0.0% 7 Riverdale 0.2% 7 Pompton Lakes -2.4% 7 West Milford 0.8% 8 Pequannock -0.1% 8 Pequannock -0.2% 8 West Milford -3.4% 8 Pequannock -3.2% 9 Butler -7.8% 9 Butler -3.5% 9 Kinnelon -7.7% 9 Butler -5.3% 10 Ringwood -7.8% 10 Ringwood -3.5% 10 Riverdale -7.7% 10 Ringwood -5.3% 11 Bloomingdale -7.9% 11 Bloomingdale -3.7% 11 Butler -10.1% 11 Bloomingdale -8.5% 12 Pompton Lakes -7.9% 12 Pompton Lakes -3.7% 12 Ringwood -10.1% 12 Pompton Lakes -8.5% NJASK Core Area LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 5
  • 14. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14 2014 Kinnelon 11.3% 2013 Oakland 19.9% 2012 Pequannock 25.0% 2011 Oakland 17.7% 2010 Oakland 12.6% 2009 Lincoln Park 26.8% 2008 West Milford 2.0% 2007 Lincoln Park 14.8% 2006 Lincoln Park 20.0% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Oakland 17.0% 2013 Lincoln Park 10.6% 2012 Oakland 26.2% 2011 Lincoln Park 19.0% 2010 Lincoln Park 24.7% 2009 Lincoln Park 7.9% 2008 Lincoln Park 3.7% 2007 Oakland 10.1% 2006 Lincoln Park 8.5% Grade 4- First-Place Ranking 2014 Ringwood 27.6% 2013 Lincoln Park 13.4% 2012 Pequannock 12.0% 2011 Oakland 6.3% 2010 Oakland 12.4% 2009 Lincoln Park 17.3% 2008 Oakland 22.0% 2007 Lincoln Park 16.4% 2006 Oakland 3.9% Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Kinnelon Oakland Pequannock Oakland Oakland Lincoln Park West Milford Lincoln Park Lincoln Park 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 11.3% 19.9% 25.0% 17.7% 12.6% 26.8% 2.0% 14.8% 20.0% Core Area Grade 3 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Oakland Lincoln Park Oakland Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Oakland Lincoln Park 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 17.0% 10.6% 26.2% 19.0% 24.7% 7.9% 3.7% 10.1% 8.5% Core Area Grade 4 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Ringwood Lincoln Park Pequannock Oakland Oakland Lincoln Park Oakland Lincoln Park Oakland 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 27.6% 13.4% 12.0% 6.3% 12.4% 17.3% 22.0% 16.4% 3.9% Core Area Grade 5 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Core Area LAL First-Place Rankings by Percentage
  • 15. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15 Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK LAL Score Changes Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Avg. 2014 Gr. 3 -1.5% -18.0% 11.3% 5.8% 5.6% 8.9% 4.7% 3.4% -0.2% -2.5% 2.5% 2.8% 1.9% Gr. 4 -20.1% -5.3% 7.8% -7.0% 17.0% 4.0% -8.5% -6.3% -8.9% -20.8% -3.8% -7.4% -4.9% Gr. 5 -0.1% -11.8% 5.0% -1.7% 16.2% 6.8% -5.4% 27.6% -8.7% -12.5% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 2013 Gr. 3 -6.9% -19.9% 14.1% -1.9% 7.8% 12.1% 0.1% -6.4% 10.1% -5.9% -3.6% -0.6% -0.1% Gr. 4 -10.6% -8.6% 5.4% -11.6% 5.8% 7.4% -3.6% 2.4% -0.6% 0.9% 3.3% 1.1% -0.7% Gr. 5 -13.4% -2.4% 10.6% 2.6% 14.6% 5.6% -2.4% -1.4% -9.4% -8.4% -5.8% 4.0% -0.4% 2012 Gr. 3 0.1% -24.9% 3.1% 11.1% 12.4% 10.7% -6.9% 5.1% -6.9% -3.9% 5.4% 5.1% 0.9% Gr. 4 -10.2% -26.2% -1.2% 1.8% 15.1% 8.8% -0.2% -2.2% 6.8% 4.8% 7.4% 0.4% Gr. 5 0.9% -11.1% 16.9% 11.9% 14.3% 11.3% -1.1% -8.1% -17.1% -14.6% 0.3% 2.7% 0.5% 2011 Gr. 3 -10.7% -17.7% 13.9% 2.0% 16.0% 8.9% -4.3% -1.9% -3.1% -4.7% 0.4% 9.4% 0.7% Gr. 4 -19.0% -14.6% 8.7% 10.9% 13.9% 6.1% -1.1% -5.0% 6.8% -22.5% -1.7% 1.6% -1.3% Gr. 5 -3.4% -6.3% 11.7% 2.8% 10.2% 9.2% -10.3% 2.9% 0.4% -19.1% -1.8% -0.7% -0.4% 2010 Gr. 3 -9.5% -12.6% 11.4% 14.0% 13.3% 10.3% 1.1% 1.1% -13.8% -18.4% -4.0% 2.3% -0.4% Gr. 4 -24.7% -2.5% 10.1% 7.9% 8.8% 10.9% 0.3% 0.3% -11.9% -18.9% -3.4% 1.5% -1.8% Gr. 5 -7.4% -12.4% 6.9% 9.5% 18.5% 14.2% -2.6% -2.6% -11.4% -17.5% -3.1% -0.4% -0.7% 2009 Gr. 3 -26.8% -17.6% 8.0% 5.5% 11.5% 14.2% -10.2% 2.1% 7.3% -16.9% -1.8% 1.8% -1.9% Gr. 4 -7.9% -7.8% 0.5% -0.8% 16.6% 13.8% -4.6% -4.4% 7.2% -22.2% 1.6% 0.0% -0.7% Gr. 5 -17.3% -13.1% 10.1% 8.8% 10.0% 9.2% -0.7% -6.0% -0.4% -17.2% -3.6% -2.7% -1.9% 2008 Gr. 3 1.7% 0.9% 1.0% 5.3% 2.5% 4.1% -5.6% 1.9% -3.4% -5.7% 0.7% 2.0% 0.5% Gr. 4 -3.7% -3.5% 6.0% 1.3% 3.9% 5.9% -3.0% -0.7% -1.4% -10.6% 2.6% 0.4% -0.2% Gr. 5 -16.7% -22.0% 16.3% 10.0% 18.1% 11.5% 2.1% -10.8% -5.0% -26.9% 3.5% -3.2% -1.9% 2007 Gr. 3 -14.8% -6.9% 6.2% -1.7% 5.1% 3.2% 1.5% 1.2% -0.7% -6.8% -1.4% -0.4% -1.3% Gr. 4 -2.4% -10.1% 5.9% 8.7% 8.8% 7.8% 5.7% -4.2% -17.5% -12.3% 3.7% -3.4% -0.8% Gr. 5 -16.4% -7.4% 1.1% 0.9% 3.1% 1.7% 0.4% -1.2% 1.2% -0.4% 0.4% 0.1% -1.3% 2006 Gr. 3 -20.0% -6.4% 5.3% 4.3% 6.7% 2.3% 2.3% -4.8% -8.8% -5.7% 2.2% -2.5% -2.1% Gr. 4 -8.5% -5.3% 4.8% 2.0% 8.7% 0.2% 6.3% -3.5% -5.7% -7.6% 1.0% 0.8% -0.6% Gr. 5 -1.2% -3.9% 5.0% -3.5% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4% -0.4% 6.1% -12.2% 0.5% -2.4% -0.5%
  • 16. Narrowing the Achievement Gap ©s 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16 NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014 Comparative District Grades 3 through 5
  • 17. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Grade 3 80.5% 80.8% 89.5% 61.5% 62.7% 62.7% 67.3% 68.2% 68.8% 71.6% Grade 4 79.2% 80.4% 82.1% 66.6% 64.0% 65.3% 59.6% 66.1% 63.8% 70.4% Grade 5 88.3% 85.0% 60.2% 69.8% 68.6% 66.6% 67.4% 68.5% 67.3% 71.8% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Suburban Trends Area Comparison District Chart NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014 Source: N.J. School Performance Report Includes: Franklin Lakes, Jefferson Township, Margate City, Paterson (Select), Tenafly, Totowa and Ventnor City
  • 18. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18 Comparison School District Score Averages 2006-2014 NJASK Language Arts & Literacy School District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly Comparative Distr. Avg. 2014 Gr. 3 71.7% 65.9% 87.4% 22.1% 82.6% 59.2% 92.9% 68.8% Gr. 4 63.7% 64.6% 81.1% 31.0% 68.9% 49.3% 88.1% 63.8% Gr. 5 71.2% 58.3% 82.5% 24.8% 85.4% 57.3% 91.9% 67.3% 2013 Gr. 3 67.0% 54.0% 85.3% 48.0% 80.0% 55.0% 88.3% 68.2% Gr. 4 60.0% 62.0% 70.3% 36.0% 91.0% 55.0% 88.5% 66.1% Gr. 5 60.0% 71.0% 85.3% 40.7% 76.0% 58.0% 88.5% 68.5% 2012 Gr. 3 78.0% 53.0% 79.3% 30.3% 86.0% 56.0% 88.5% 67.3% Gr. 4 57.0% 41.0% 83.3% 27.3% 79.0% 49.0% 80.8% 59.6% Gr. 5 73.0% 61.0% 91.0% 31.0% 76.0% 53.0% 86.5% 67.4% 2011 Gr. 3 60.2% 53.2% 78.7% 29.7% 76.3% 54.2% 86.7% 62.7% Gr. 4 56.4% 60.8% 83.6% 32.4% 82.1% 53.3% 88.2% 65.3% Gr. 5 67.6% 64.7% 85.4% 23.3% 74.5% 60.3% 90.3% 66.6% 2010 Gr. 3 60.3% 57.2% 84.9% 26.0% 76.8% 45.8% 87.6% 62.7% Gr. 4 47.9% 70.1% 80.5% 25.7% 74.5% 57.9% 91.5% 64.0% Gr. 5 65.3% 60.3% 88.7% 27.7% 77.8% 68.2% 92.1% 68.6% 2009 Gr. 3 45.2% 54.4% 79.4% 22.0% 80.0% 60.5% 89.0% 61.5% Gr. 4 66.2% 66.3% 80.1% 29.6% 82.6% 56.2% 85.1% 66.6% Gr. 5 62.5% 66.7% 91.9% 32.1% 85.9% 57.6% 91.7% 69.8% 2008 Gr. 3 94.0% 93.2% 95.8% 58.6% 98.2% 91.7% 95.1% 89.5% Gr. 4 84.8% 85.0% 94.8% 47.4% 89.6% 77.5% 95.4% 82.1% Gr. 5 51.6% 46.3% 88.7% 25.5% 72.0% 45.6% 92.0% 60.2% 2007 Gr. 3 75.9% 83.8% 95.2% 44.3% 97.0% 71.4% 97.7% 80.8% Gr. 4 83.8% 76.1% 95.6% 46.8% 90.8% 73.6% 95.8% 80.4% Gr. 5 78.9% 87.9% 98.3% 55.2% 95.0% 80.4% 99.1% 85.0% 2006 Gr. 3 68.8% 82.4% 95.4% 51.6% 98.0% 71.7% 95.7% 80.5% Gr. 4 79.9% 83.1% 94.1% 45.1% 81.5% 73.9% 96.8% 79.2% Gr. 5 92.7% 90.0% 98.9% 61.8% 94.8% 82.5% 97.1% 88.3%
  • 19. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 83.1% 80.2% 88.6% 83.0% 80.9% 87.4% 89.1% 83.0% 64.9% 64.6% 67.6% 72.6% 62.8% 66.3% 69.3% 64.4% 66.2%66.7% 66.7% 61.6% 67.5% 67.4%66.7% 70.9% 68.8% 63.8% 67.3% NJASK LAL Comparison District Averages by Grade
  • 20. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20 NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade 3 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 88.3% 88.5% 88.5% 2 Franklin Lakes 85.3% 70.3% 85.3% 3 Margate City 80.0% 91.0% 76.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 61.0% 64.0% 77.0% 5 Ventnor City 55.0% 55.0% 58.0% 6 Totowa 54.0% 62.0% 71.0% 7 Paterson 48.0% 36.0% 40.7% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 88.5% 80.8% 86.5% 2 Margate City 86.0% 79.0% 76.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 79.3% 83.3% 91.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 74.0% 70.5% 74.0% 5 Ventnor City 56.0% 49.0% 53.0% 6 Totowa 53.0% 41.0% 61.0% 7 Paterson 30.3% 27.3% 31.0% 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 92.9% 88.1% 91.9% 2 Franklin Lakes 87.4% 81.1% 82.5% 3 Margate City 82.6% 68.9% 85.4% 4 Jefferson Twp 71.7% 63.7% 71.2% 5 Totowa 65.9% 64.6% 58.3% 6 Ventnor City 59.2% 49.3% 57.3% 7 Paterson 22.1% 31.0% 24.8% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 86.7% 88.2% 90.3% 2 Franklin Lakes 78.7% 83.6% 85.4% 3 Margate City 76.3% 82.1% 74.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 72.2% 62.9% 68.6% 5 Ventnor City 54.2% 53.3% 60.3% 6 Totowa 53.2% 60.8% 64.7% 7 Paterson 29.7% 32.4% 23.3% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 87.6% 91.5% 92.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 84.9% 80.5% 88.7% 3 Margate City 76.8% 74.5% 77.8% 4 Jefferson Twp 61.1% 64.1% 70.1% 5 Totowa 57.2% 70.1% 60.3% 6 Ventnor City 45.8% 57.9% 68.2% 7 Paterson 26.0% 25.7% 27.7% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 89.0% 85.1% 91.7% 2 Margate City 80.0% 82.6% 85.9% 3 Franklin Lakes 79.4% 80.1% 91.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 67.0% 73.4% 82.2% 5 Ventnor City 60.5% 56.2% 57.6% 6 Totowa 54.4% 66.3% 66.7% 7 Paterson 22.0% 29.6% 32.1% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 98.2% 89.6% 72.0% 2 Franklin Lakes 95.8% 94.8% 88.7% 3 Tenafly 95.1% 95.4% 92.0% 4 Totowa 93.2% 85.0% 46.3% 5 Ventnor City 91.7% 77.5% 45.6% 6 Jefferson Twp 91.0% 91.5% 84.0% 7 Paterson 58.6% 47.4% 25.5% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 97.7% 95.8% 99.1% 2 Margate City 97.0% 90.8% 95.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 95.2% 95.6% 98.3% 4 Jefferson Twp 91.8% 87.3% 96.0% 5 Totowa 83.8% 76.1% 87.9% 6 Ventnor City 71.4% 73.6% 80.4% 7 Paterson 44.3% 46.8% 55.2% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 98.0% 81.5% 94.8% 2 Tenafly 95.7% 96.8% 97.1% 3 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 94.1% 98.9% 4 Totowa 82.4% 83.1% 90.0% 5 Ventnor City 71.7% 73.9% 82.5% 6 Jefferson Twp 68.8% 79.9% 92.7% 7 Paterson 51.6% 45.1% 61.8%
  • 21. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21 NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade 4 2014 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 88.1% 92.9% 91.9% 2 Franklin Lakes 81.1% 87.4% 82.5% 3 Margate City 68.9% 82.6% 85.4% 4 Totowa 64.6% 65.9% 58.3% 5 Jefferson Twp 63.7% 71.7% 71.2% 6 Ventnor City 49.3% 59.2% 57.3% 7 Paterson 31.0% 22.1% 24.8% 2013 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 91.0% 80.0% 76.0% 2 Tenafly 88.5% 88.3% 88.5% 3 Franklin Lakes 70.3% 85.3% 85.3% 4 Jefferson Twp 64.0% 61.0% 77.0% 5 Totowa 62.0% 54.0% 71.0% 6 Ventnor City 55.0% 55.0% 58.0% 7 Paterson 36.0% 48.0% 40.7% 2012 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 83.3% 79.3% 91.0% 2 Tenafly 80.8% 88.5% 86.5% 3 Margate City 79.0% 86.0% 76.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 70.5% 74.0% 74.0% 5 Ventnor City 49.0% 56.0% 53.0% 6 Totowa 41.0% 53.0% 61.0% 7 Paterson 27.3% 30.3% 31.0% 2011 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 88.2% 86.7% 90.3% 2 Franklin Lakes 83.6% 78.7% 85.4% 3 Margate City 82.1% 76.3% 74.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 62.9% 72.2% 68.6% 5 Totowa 60.8% 53.2% 64.7% 6 Ventnor City 53.3% 54.2% 60.3% 7 Paterson 32.4% 29.7% 23.3% 2010 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 91.5% 87.6% 92.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 80.5% 84.9% 88.7% 3 Margate City 74.5% 76.8% 77.8% 4 Totowa 70.1% 57.2% 60.3% 5 Jefferson Twp 64.1% 61.1% 70.1% 6 Ventnor City 57.9% 45.8% 68.2% 7 Paterson 25.7% 26.0% 27.7% 2009 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 85.1% 89.0% 91.7% 2 Margate City 82.6% 80.0% 85.9% 3 Franklin Lakes 80.1% 79.4% 91.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 73.4% 67.0% 82.2% 5 Totowa 66.3% 54.4% 66.7% 6 Ventnor City 56.2% 60.5% 57.6% 7 Paterson 29.6% 22.0% 32.1% 2008 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 95.4% 95.1% 92.0% 2 Franklin Lakes 94.8% 95.8% 88.7% 3 Jefferson Twp 91.5% 91.0% 84.0% 4 Margate City 89.6% 98.2% 72.0% 5 Totowa 85.0% 93.2% 46.3% 6 Ventnor City 77.5% 91.7% 45.6% 7 Paterson 47.4% 58.6% 25.5% 2007 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 95.8% 97.7% 99.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 95.6% 95.2% 98.3% 3 Margate City 90.8% 97.0% 95.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 87.3% 91.8% 96.0% 5 Totowa 76.1% 83.8% 87.9% 6 Ventnor City 73.6% 71.4% 80.4% 7 Paterson 46.8% 44.3% 55.2% 2006 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 96.8% 95.7% 97.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 94.1% 95.4% 98.9% 3 Totowa 83.1% 82.4% 90.0% 4 Margate City 81.5% 98.0% 94.8% 5 Jefferson Twp 79.9% 68.8% 92.7% 6 Ventnor City 73.9% 71.7% 82.5% 7 Paterson 45.1% 51.6% 61.8%
  • 22. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22 2011 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 90.3% 86.7% 88.2% 2 Franklin Lakes 85.4% 78.7% 83.6% 3 Margate City 74.5% 76.3% 82.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 68.6% 72.2% 62.9% 5 Totowa 64.7% 53.2% 60.8% 6 Ventnor City 60.3% 54.2% 53.3% 7 Paterson 23.3% 29.7% 32.4% 2010 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 92.1% 87.6% 91.5% 2 Franklin Lakes 88.7% 84.9% 80.5% 3 Margate City 77.8% 76.8% 74.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 70.1% 61.1% 64.1% 5 Ventnor City 68.2% 45.8% 57.9% 6 Totowa 60.3% 57.2% 70.1% 7 Paterson 27.7% 26.0% 25.7% 2009 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 91.9% 79.4% 80.1% 2 Tenafly 91.7% 89.0% 85.1% 3 Margate City 85.9% 80.0% 82.6% 4 Jefferson Twp 82.2% 67.0% 73.4% 5 Totowa 66.7% 54.4% 66.3% 6 Ventnor City 57.6% 60.5% 56.2% 7 Paterson 32.1% 22.0% 29.6% NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade 5 2013 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 88.5% 88.3% 88.5% 2 Franklin Lakes 85.3% 85.3% 70.3% 3 Jefferson Twp 77.0% 61.0% 64.0% 4 Margate City 76.0% 80.0% 91.0% 5 Totowa 71.0% 54.0% 62.0% 6 Ventnor City 58.0% 55.0% 55.0% 7 Paterson 40.7% 48.0% 36.0% 2012 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 91.0% 79.3% 83.3% 2 Tenafly 86.5% 88.5% 80.8% 3 Margate City 76.0% 86.0% 79.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 74.0% 74.0% 70.5% 5 Totowa 61.0% 53.0% 41.0% 6 Ventnor City 53.0% 56.0% 49.0% 7 Paterson 31.0% 30.3% 27.3% 2014 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 91.9% 92.9% 88.1% 2 Margate City 85.4% 82.6% 68.9% 3 Franklin Lakes 82.5% 87.4% 81.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 71.2% 71.7% 63.7% 5 Totowa 58.3% 65.9% 64.6% 6 Ventnor City 57.3% 59.2% 49.3% 7 Paterson 24.8% 22.1% 31.0% 2008 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 92.0% 95.1% 95.4% 2 Franklin Lakes 88.7% 95.8% 94.8% 3 Jefferson Twp 84.0% 91.0% 91.5% 4 Margate City 72.0% 98.2% 89.6% 5 Totowa 46.3% 93.2% 85.0% 6 Ventnor City 45.6% 91.7% 77.5% 7 Paterson 25.5% 58.6% 47.4% 2007 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 99.1% 97.7% 95.8% 2 Franklin Lakes 98.3% 95.2% 95.6% 3 Jefferson Twp 96.0% 91.8% 87.3% 4 Margate City 95.0% 97.0% 90.8% 5 Totowa 87.9% 83.8% 76.1% 6 Ventnor City 80.4% 71.4% 73.6% 7 Paterson 55.2% 44.3% 46.8% 2006 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 98.9% 95.4% 94.1% 2 Tenafly 97.1% 95.7% 96.8% 3 Margate City 94.8% 98.0% 81.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 92.7% 68.8% 79.9% 5 Totowa 90.0% 82.4% 83.1% 6 Ventnor City 82.5% 71.7% 73.9% 7 Paterson 61.8% 51.6% 45.1%
  • 23. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23 2014 Tenafly 92.9% 2013 Tenafly 88.3% 2012 Tenafly 88.5% 2011 Tenafly 86.7% 2010 Tenafly 87.6% 2009 Tenafly 89.0% 2008 Margate City 98.2% 2007 Tenafly 97.7% 2006 Margate City 98.0% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Tenafly 88.1% 2013 Margate City 91.0% 2012 Franklin Lakes 83.3% 2011 Tenafly 88.2% 2010 Tenafly 91.5% 2009 Tenafly 85.1% 2008 Tenafly 95.4% 2007 Tenafly 95.8% 2006 Tenafly 96.8% Grade 4 - First Place Ranking 2014 Tenafly 91.9% 2013 Tenafly 88.5% 2012 Franklin Lakes 91.0% 2011 Tenafly 90.3% 2010 Tenafly 92.1% 2009 Franklin Lakes 91.9% 2008 Tenafly 92.0% 2007 Tenafly 99.1% 2006 Franklin Lakes 98.9% Grade 5 - First Place Ranking 80.0% 81.0% 82.0% 83.0% 84.0% 85.0% 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyMargate City TenaflyMargate City 201420132012201120102009200820072006 92.9% 88.3%88.5% 86.7% 87.6% 89.0% 98.2% 97.7%98.0% Comparison District Grade 3 First Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 75.0% 76.0% 77.0% 78.0% 79.0% 80.0% 81.0% 82.0% 83.0% 84.0% 85.0% 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyMargate City TenaflyMargate City 201420132012201120102009200820072006 88.1% 91.0% 83.3% 88.2% 91.5% 85.1% 95.4%95.8% 96.8% Comparison District Grade 4 First Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 83.0% 84.0% 85.0% 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyMargate City TenaflyMargate City 201420132012201120102009200820072006 91.9% 88.5% 91.0% 90.3% 92.1%91.9%92.0% 99.1%98.9% Comparison District Grade 5 First Place LAL Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Comparative District LAL First-Place Rankings by Year
  • 24. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24 -3.0% -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2.4% -1.7% 1.3% 0.8% -2.2% 2.2% 0.8% -1.7% 6.2% 1.1% 0.7% 1.9% 4.0% 1.5% 3.8% -2.2% 1.4% 1.0% 1.5% 1.0% 2.8% -1.1% 3.5% -2.3% -0.8% 1.2% 0.3% NJASK Comparison District LAL Score Change by Percent
  • 25. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25 -60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 2010 Gr. 4 2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4 Comparison of Comparative District NJASK LAL Score Changes by Percent Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly
  • 26. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26 2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3 Franklin Lakes 11.3% 1 Franklin Lakes 14.1% 1 Margate City 12.4% 1 Margate City 16.0% 1 Paterson 14.0% Ventnor City 8.9% 2 Ventnor City 12.1% 2 Paterson 11.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 13.9% 2 Margate City 13.3% Paterson 5.8% 3 Margate City 7.8% 3 Ventnor City 10.7% 3 Ventnor City 8.9% 3 Franklin Lakes 11.4% Margate City 5.6% 4 Tenafly 0.1% 4 Franklin Lakes 3.1% 4 Paterson 2.0% 4 Ventnor City 10.3% Tenafly 4.7% 5 Paterson -1.9% 5 Jefferson Twp 0.1% 5 Tenafly -4.3% 5 Tenafly 1.1% Jefferson Twp -1.5% 6 Jefferson Twp -6.9% 6 Tenafly -6.9% 6 Jefferson Twp -10.7% 6 Jefferson Twp -9.5% Totowa -18.0% 7 Totowa -19.9% 7 Totowa -24.9% 7 Totowa -17.7% 7 Totowa -12.6% 2009 Gr. 3 2008 Gr. 3 2007 Gr. 3 2006 Gr. 3 Ventnor City 14.2% 1 Paterson 5.3% 1 Franklin Lakes 6.2% 1 Margate City 6.7% Margate City 11.5% 2 Ventnor City 4.1% 2 Margate City 5.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 5.3% Franklin Lakes 8.0% 3 Margate City 2.5% 3 Ventnor City 3.2% 3 Paterson 4.3% Paterson 5.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 1.7% 4 Tenafly 1.5% 4 Tenafly 2.3% Tenafly -10.2% 5 Franklin Lakes 1.0% 5 Paterson -1.7% 5 Ventnor City 2.3% Totowa -17.6% 6 Totowa 0.9% 6 Totowa -6.9% 6 Totowa -6.4% Jefferson Twp -26.8% 7 Tenafly -5.6% 7 Jefferson Twp -14.8% 7 Jefferson Twp -20.0% NJASK Comparison District LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 3
  • 27. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27 2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 1 Margate City 17.0% 1 Ventnor City 7.4% 1 Margate City 15.1% 1 Margate City 13.9% 2 Franklin Lakes 7.8% 2 Margate City 5.8% 2 Ventnor City 8.8% 2 Paterson 10.9% 3 Ventnor City 4.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 5.4% 3 Paterson 1.8% 3 Franklin Lakes 8.7% 4 Totowa -5.3% 4 Tenafly -3.6% 4 Tenafly -0.2% 4 Ventnor City 6.1% 5 Paterson -7.0% 5 Totowa -8.6% 5 Franklin Lakes -1.2% 5 Tenafly -1.1% 6 Tenafly -8.5% 6 Jefferson Twp -10.6% 6 Jefferson Twp -10.2% 6 Totowa -14.6% 7 Jefferson Twp -20.1% 7 Paterson -11.6% 7 Totowa -26.2% 7 Jefferson Twp -19.0% 2010 Gr. 4 2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4 1 Ventnor City 10.9% 1 Margate City 16.6% 1 Franklin Lakes 6.0% 1 Margate City 8.8% 1 Margate City 8.7% 2 Franklin Lakes 10.1% 2 Ventnor City 13.8% 2 Ventnor City 5.9% 2 Paterson 8.7% 2 Tenafly 6.3% 3 Margate City 8.8% 3 Franklin Lakes 0.5% 3 Margate City 3.9% 3 Ventnor City 7.8% 3 Franklin Lakes 4.8% 4 Paterson 7.9% 4 Paterson -0.8% 4 Paterson 1.3% 4 Franklin Lakes 5.9% 4 Paterson 2.0% 5 Tenafly 0.3% 5 Tenafly -4.6% 5 Tenafly -3.0% 5 Tenafly 5.7% 5 Ventnor City 0.2% 6 Totowa -2.5% 6 Totowa -7.8% 6 Totowa -3.5% 6 Jefferson Twp -2.4% 6 Totowa -5.3% 7 Jefferson Twp -24.7% 7 Jefferson Twp -7.9% 7 Jefferson Twp -3.7% 7 Totowa -10.1% 7 Jefferson Twp -8.5% NJASK Comparison District LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 4
  • 28. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28 2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 16.2% 1 Margate City 14.6% 1 Franklin Lakes 16.9% 1 Franklin Lakes 11.7% 2 Ventnor City 6.8% 2 Franklin Lakes 10.6% 2 Margate City 14.3% 2 Margate City 10.2% 3 Franklin Lakes 5.0% 3 Ventnor City 5.6% 3 Paterson 11.9% 3 Ventnor City 9.2% 4 Jefferson Twp -0.1% 4 Paterson 2.6% 4 Ventnor City 11.3% 4 Paterson 2.8% 5 Paterson -1.7% 5 Totowa -2.4% 5 Jefferson Twp 0.9% 5 Jefferson Twp -3.4% 6 Tenafly -5.4% 6 Tenafly -2.4% 6 Tenafly -1.1% 6 Totowa -6.3% 7 Totowa -11.8% 7 Jefferson Twp -13.4% 7 Totowa -11.1% 7 Tenafly -10.3% 2010 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 5 2006 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 18.5% 1 Franklin Lakes 10.1% 1 Margate City 18.1% 1 Margate City 3.1% 1 Franklin Lakes 5.0% 2 Ventnor City 14.2% 2 Margate City 10.0% 2 Franklin Lakes 16.3% 2 Ventnor City 1.7% 2 Margate City 3.0% 3 Paterson 9.5% 3 Ventnor City 9.2% 3 Ventnor City 11.5% 3 Franklin Lakes 1.1% 3 Ventnor City 2.7% 4 Franklin Lakes 6.9% 4 Paterson 8.8% 4 Paterson 10.0% 4 Paterson 0.9% 4 Tenafly 0.4% 5 Tenafly -2.6% 5 Tenafly -0.7% 5 Tenafly 2.1% 5 Tenafly 0.4% 5 Jefferson Twp -1.2% 6 Jefferson Twp -7.4% 6 Totowa -13.1% 6 Jefferson Twp -16.7% 6 Totowa -7.4% 6 Paterson -3.5% 7 Totowa -12.4% 7 Jefferson Twp -17.3% 7 Totowa -22.0% 7 Jefferson Twp -16.4% 7 Totowa -3.9% NJASK Comparison District LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 5
  • 29. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% Franklin Lakes Franklin Lakes Margate City Margate City PatersonVentnor City PatersonFranklin Lakes Margate City 201420132012201120102009200820072006 Comparison District Grade 3 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% Margate City Ventnor City Margate City Margate City Ventnor City Margate City Franklin Lakes Margate City Margate City 201420132012201120102009200820072006 Comparison District Grade 4 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% Margate City Margate City Franklin Lakes Franklin Lakes Margate City Franklin Lakes Margate City Margate City Franklin Lakes 201420132012201120102009200820072006 Comparison District Grade 5 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 2014 Franklin Lakes 11.3% 2013 Franklin Lakes 14.1% 2012 Margate City 12.4% 2011 Margate City 16.0% 2010 Paterson 14.0% 2009 Ventnor City 14.2% 2008 Paterson 5.3% 2007 Franklin Lakes 6.2% 2006 Margate City 6.7% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Margate City 17.0% 2013 Ventnor City 7.4% 2012 Margate City 15.1% 2011 Margate City 13.9% 2010 Ventnor City 10.9% 2009 Margate City 16.6% 2008 Franklin Lakes 6.0% 2007 Margate City 8.8% 2006 Margate City 8.7% Grade 4 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Margate City 16.2% 2013 Margate City 14.6% 2012 Franklin Lakes 16.9% 2011 Franklin Lakes 11.7% 2010 Margate City 18.5% 2009 Franklin Lakes 10.1% 2008 Margate City 18.1% 2007 Margate City 3.1% 2006 Franklin Lakes 5.0% Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking NJASK Comparsion District First Place Rankings by Percentage
  • 30. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30 Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly Avg. 2014 Gr. 3 -1.5% -18.0% 11.3% 5.8% 5.6% 8.9% 4.7% 2.4% Gr. 4 -20.1% -5.3% 7.8% -7.0% 17.0% 4.0% -8.5% -1.7% Gr. 5 -0.1% -11.8% 5.0% -1.7% 16.2% 6.8% -5.4% 1.3% 2013 Gr. 3 -6.9% -19.9% 14.1% -1.9% 7.8% 12.1% 0.1% 0.8% Gr. 4 -10.6% -8.6% 5.4% -11.6% 5.8% 7.4% -3.6% -2.2% Gr. 5 -13.4% -2.4% 10.6% 2.6% 14.6% 5.6% -2.4% 2.2% 2012 Gr. 3 0.1% -24.9% 3.1% 11.1% 12.4% 10.7% -6.9% 0.8% Gr. 4 -10.2% -26.2% -1.2% 1.8% 15.1% 8.8% -0.2% -1.7% Gr. 5 0.9% -11.1% 16.9% 11.9% 14.3% 11.3% -1.1% 6.2% 2011 Gr. 3 -10.7% -17.7% 13.9% 2.0% 16.0% 8.9% -4.3% 1.1% Gr. 4 -19.0% -14.6% 8.7% 10.9% 13.9% 6.1% -1.1% 0.7% Gr. 5 -3.4% -6.3% 11.7% 2.8% 10.2% 9.2% -10.3% 1.9% 2010 Gr. 3 -9.5% -12.6% 11.4% 14.0% 13.3% 10.3% 1.1% 4.0% Gr. 4 -24.7% -2.5% 10.1% 7.9% 8.8% 10.9% 0.3% 1.5% Gr. 5 -7.4% -12.4% 6.9% 9.5% 18.5% 14.2% -2.6% 3.8% 2009 Gr. 3 -26.8% -17.6% 8.0% 5.5% 11.5% 14.2% -10.2% -2.2% Gr. 4 -7.9% -7.8% 0.5% -0.8% 16.6% 13.8% -4.6% 1.4% Gr. 5 -17.3% -13.1% 10.1% 8.8% 10.0% 9.2% -0.7% 1.0% 2008 Gr. 3 1.7% 0.9% 1.0% 5.3% 2.5% 4.1% -5.6% 1.5% Gr. 4 -3.7% -3.5% 6.0% 1.3% 3.9% 5.9% -3.0% 1.0% Gr. 5 -16.7% -22.0% 16.3% 10.0% 18.1% 11.5% 2.1% 2.8% 2007 Gr. 3 -14.8% -6.9% 6.2% -1.7% 5.1% 3.2% 1.5% -1.1% Gr. 4 -2.4% -10.1% 5.9% 8.7% 8.8% 7.8% 5.7% 3.5% Gr. 5 -16.4% -7.4% 1.1% 0.9% 3.1% 1.7% 0.4% -2.3% 2006 Gr. 3 -20.0% -6.4% 5.3% 4.3% 6.7% 2.3% 2.3% -0.8% Gr. 4 -8.5% -5.3% 4.8% 2.0% 8.7% 0.2% 6.3% 1.2% Gr. 5 -1.2% -3.9% 5.0% -3.5% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4% 0.3% Comparison of Comparison District NJASK LAL Score Changes
  • 31. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31 Narrowing the Achievement Gap Fourth Grade Data
  • 32. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32 Total Core Area Average Total CD Area Average Comparison to CD Average 2013 70.6% 66.7% 3.9% 2012 67.2% 61.6% 5.7% 2011 75.4% 66.2% 9.2% 2010 72.6% 66.3% 6.3% 2009 74.1% 67.6% 6.5% 2008 88.5% 83.0% 5.5% 2007 86.2% 80.9% 5.3% 2006 88.4% 80.2% 8.2% Total Core Area Average Literacy Scores Total CD Area Average Literacy Score NJ Average U.S. Average 2013 70.6% 66.7% 75.0% 68.0% 2012 67.2% 61.6% 2011 75.4% 66.2% 78.1% 66.2% 2010 72.6% 66.3% 76.1% 65.7% 2009 74.1% 67.6% 2008 88.5% 83.0% 82.7% 66.8% 2007 86.2% 80.9% 80.6% 61.9% 2006 88.4% 80.2% 82.5% 70.6% NJASK 4th Grade Literacy and Language Arts Comparsion 2006-2013
  • 33. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33 NJASK 4th Grade Literacy and Language Arts Comparsion 2006-2013 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 20132012201120102009200820072006 70.6% 67.2% 75.4% 72.6% 74.1% 88.5% 86.2% 88.4% 66.7% 61.6% 66.2%66.3% 67.6% 83.0% 80.9%80.2% NJASK 4th Grade NJASK Literacy Score Comparison 2006-2013 Total Core Area Average Literacy Scores Total CD Area Average Literacy Score NJ Average U.S. Average Total Core Area Average Total CD Area Average Comparison to CD Average 2013 70.6% 66.7% 3.9% 2012 67.2% 61.6% 5.7% 2011 75.4% 66.2% 9.2% 2010 72.6% 66.3% 6.3% 2009 74.1% 67.6% 6.5% 2008 88.5% 83.0% 5.5% 2007 86.2% 80.9% 5.3% 2006 88.4% 80.2% 8.2%
  • 34. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Core Area Literacy Total Core Area Average Literacy Score Core Area Average English Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34
  • 35. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35 New Jersey NJASK LAL Averages - Grade 4 Below Basic Basic Proficient Total Proficient Advanced Proficient 2013 25.0% 33.0% 30.0% 63.0% 12.0% 2012 2011 21.9% 34.2% 32.5% 66.7% 11.4% 2010 23.9% 35.8% 30.1% 65.9% 10.2% 2009 2008 17.3% 78.1% 4.6% 2007 19.4% 73.9% 6.7% 2006 17.5% 79.6% 2.9% New Jersey Below Basic Basic Proficient Total Proficient Advanced Proficient 2013 32.0% 33.0% 27.0% 60.0% 8.0% 2012 2011 33.8% 33.8% 24.9% 58.7% 7.5% 2010 34.4% 34.1% 24.4% 58.5% 7.2% 2009 2008 33.2% 65.6% 1.2% 2007 38.1% 60.1% 1.8% 2006 30.4% 67.7% 2.9% U.S. Below Basic Total Proficient Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP 2013 25.0% 63.0% 12.0% 75.0% 2012 2011 21.9% 66.7% 11.4% 78.1% 2010 23.9% 65.9% 10.2% 76.1% 2008 17.3% 78.1% 4.6% 82.7% 2009 2007 19.4% 73.9% 6.7% 80.6% 2006 17.5% 79.6% 2.9% 82.5% New Jersey Below Basic Total Proficient Advanced Proficient Combined TP & TAP 2013 32.0% 60.0% 8.0% 68.0% 2012 2011 33.8% 58.7% 7.5% 66.2% 2010 34.4% 58.5% 7.2% 65.7% 2008 33.2% 65.6% 1.2% 66.8% 2009 2007 38.1% 60.1% 1.8% 61.9% 2006 30.4% 67.7% 2.9% 70.6% U.S.
  • 36. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 201120102009200820072006 NJASK Grade 4 LAL Score Comparison Total CD Area Gr 4 Score Average Total Core Study Area Gr 4 Score Average
  • 37. NJASK 4th Grade Enrollment Comparsion 2006-2011 Core Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Comparative Distr. Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Combined Core & CD Avg Gr 4 Enrollment 2011 177.3 145.9 165.7 2010 178.2 157.4 170.5 2009 176.4 156.9 169.2 2008 175.9 168.9 173.3 2007 184.1 159.4 175.0 2006 182.5 162.1 175.0 Average 179.1 158.4 171.5 Core Study Area Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Core Study Area Gr 4 Class Size Avg 2011 177.3 22.8 2010 178.2 23.1 2009 176.4 20.0 2008 175.9 20.2 2007 184.1 20.7 2006 182.5 21.3 Average 179.1 21.3 Comparative Distr. Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Comparative Distr. Gr 4 Class Size Avg 2011 145.9 20.3 2010 157.4 18.3 2009 156.9 19.6 2008 168.9 19.6 2007 159.4 19.3 2006 162.1 21.2 Average 158.4 19.7 Core Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Comparative Distr. Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. Gr 4 Class Enrollment Average 2011 177.3 145.9 161.6 2010 178.2 157.4 21.6 2009 176.4 156.9 20.7 2008 175.9 168.9 21.0 2007 184.1 159.4 21.4 2006 182.5 162.1 21.6 Average 179.1 158.4 44.6 Core Area Gr 4 Average Score Core AreaGrade 4 Enrollment Avg. 2011 75.4% 177.3 2010 72.6% 178.2 2009 74.1% 176.4 2008 88.5% 175.9 2007 86.2% 184.1 2006 88.4% 182.5 Average 80.9% 179.1 Total CD Area Gr. 4 Average Score Comparative Distr. Grade 4 Enrollment Avg. 2011 66.2% 145.9 2010 66.3% 157.4 2009 67.6% 156.9 2008 83.0% 168.9 2007 80.9% 159.4 2006 80.2% 162.1 Average 74.0% 158.4 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37
  • 38. NJASK 4th Grade Class Size Comparsion 2006-2011 Total Core Area Gr 4 Score Average Total CD Area Gr 4 Score Average Comparison to Class Size Average Total Core Area Gr 4 Average Score Core Gr 4 Class Size Avg Total CD Area Average Score Comparative Distr. Gr 4 Class Size Avg Core Gr 4 Class Size Avg Comparative Distr. Gr 4 Class Size Avg Gr 4 Class Size Average 2011 75.4% 66.2% 21.9 2011 75.4% 22.8 2011 66.2% 20.3 2011 22.8 20.3 21.9 2010 72.6% 66.3% 21.6 2010 72.6% 23.1 2010 66.3% 18.3 2010 23.1 18.3 21.6 2009 74.1% 67.6% 20.7 2009 74.1% 20.0 2009 67.6% 19.6 2009 20.0 19.6 20.7 2008 88.5% 83.0% 21.0 2008 88.5% 20.2 2008 83.0% 19.6 2008 20.2 19.6 21.0 2007 86.2% 80.9% 21.4 2007 86.2% 20.7 2007 80.9% 19.3 2007 20.7 19.3 21.4 2006 88.4% 80.2% 21.6 2006 88.4% 21.3 2006 80.2% 21.2 2006 21.3 21.2 21.6 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 201120102009200820072006 NJASK Grade 4 Class Size Comparison Core Study AreaGr 4 Class Size Avg 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 201120102009200820072006 NJASK Grade 4 Class Size Comparison Core Study AreaGr 4 Class Size Avg Comparative Distr. Gr 4 Class Size Avg Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38
  • 39. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 39 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 20132012201120102009200820072006 70.6% 67.2% 75.4% 72.6% 74.1% 88.5% 86.2% 88.4% 66.7% 61.6% 66.2%66.3%67.6% 83.0% 80.9%80.2% 75.0% 78.1% 76.1% 82.7% 80.6% 82.5% 68.0% 66.2%65.7%66.8% 61.9% 70.6% NJASK 4th Grade NJASK Literacy Score Comparison 2006-2013 Total Core Area Average Literacy Scores Total CD Area Average Literacy Score NJ Average U.S. Average
  • 40. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 40 SAT Verbal Scores
  • 41. TOWNS Core Towns Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Riverdale Pompton Lks Oakland Wanaque Ringwood West Milford Lincoln Park Pequannock Wayne Hills Wayne Valley Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly SAT NJ Ranking 37 60 156 201 77 50 91 179 208 43 274 5 SAT Scores V 2013 530 553 503 468 527 512 510 487 465 529 330 592 SAT Scores M 2013 567 560 509 491 573 555 555 505 501 559 340 652 SAT Scores V 2012 538 534 490 471 512 523 516 484 473 534 368 575 SAT Scores M 2012 564 546 503 494 536 566 550 500 496 546 377 632 SAT Scores V 2011 543 530 488 463 515 526 510 479 461 540 344 578 SAT Scores M 2011 575 539 500 499 539 569 536 494 489 561 395 636 SAT Scores V 2010 532 543 501 470 517 525 517 482 483 549 363 573 SAT Scores M 2010 557 556 512 481 546 568 554 502 503 566 408 640 SAT Scores V 2009 535 522 478 486 498 525 517 482 474 556 364 576 SAT Scores M 2009 559 538 496 502 517 565 559 494 496 570 398 630 SAT Scores V 2008 541 544 496 471 486 521 511 490 469 544 362 583 SAT Scores M 2008 579 541 504 490 513 569 553 515 496 541 398 623 SAT Scores V 2007 519 535 481 479 485 513 517 488 469 535 369 572 SAT Scores M 2007 532 542 501 516 500 549 556 503 494 542 404 619 SAT Scores V 2006 528 532 497 477 521 519 520 502 481 532 363 569 SAT Scores M 2006 543 546 514 497 539 566 555 523 502 546 410 620 SAT Participation 94.0% 91.0% 73.9% 74.6% 94.8% 88.7% (H); 84.4% (V) 83.5% 80.3% 72.4% 92.2% 88.1% 94.0% 266 429 461 432 450 444 423 497 539 492 432 454 488 513 509 78.7% 77.1% 83.5% 487 503 493 441 468 488 481 503 499 548 516 421 441 494 493 520 499 541 513 430 447 507 490 514 487 535 520 434 449 498 501 510 501 528 515 503 492 506 499 518 521 498 491 510 143 121 97 505 527 520 495 493 510 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 41 Study Area N.J. SAT Scores
  • 42. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 42 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 20132012201120102009200820072006 SAT Verbal Scores by School District 2006-2013 Butle r H.S. Kinn elon H.S. Pom pton Lks H.S. India n Hills RHS
  • 43. SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013 ButlerH.S. KinnelonH.S. IndianHills RHS WestMilfordH.S. BoontonH.S. PequannockTWP HS WayneHillsH.S. WayneValley H.S. JeffersonH.S. Passaic ValleyRHS Ramapo H.S. Paterson TenaflyH.S. 2013 495 530 553 503 468 527 512 510 487 465 529 330 592 2012 503 538 534 490 471 512 523 516 484 473 534 368 575 2011 498 543 530 488 463 515 526 510 479 461 540 344 578 2010 498 532 543 501 470 517 525 517 482 483 549 363 573 2009 507 535 522 478 486 498 525 517 482 474 556 364 576 2008 494 541 544 496 471 486 521 511 490 469 544 362 583 2007 488 519 535 481 479 485 513 517 488 469 535 369 572 2006 488 528 532 497 477 521 519 520 502 481 532 363 569 Average 496 533 537 492 473 508 521 515 487 472 540 358 577 LakelandRHS AtlanticCityH.S. 513 509 423 481 503 432 493 520 441 490 514 421 501 430510494 492 506 432 493 510 429 510 430 491 510 434 PomptonLksH.S. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 43
  • 44. SAT Verbal Rankings by School 2006-2013 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Butler H.S. 495 503 498 498 507 494 488 488 Kinnelon H.S. 530 538 543 532 535 541 519 528 Indian Hills RHS 553 534 530 543 522 544 535 532 West Milford H.S. 503 490 488 501 478 496 481 497 Boonton H.S. 468 471 463 470 486 471 479 477 Pequannoc k TWP RHS 527 512 515 517 498 486 485 521 Wayne Hills H.S. 512 523 526 525 525 521 513 519 Wayne Valley H.S. 510 516 510 517 517 511 517 520 Jefferson H.S. 487 484 479 482 482 490 488 502 Passaic Valley RHS 465 473 461 483 474 469 469 481 Ramapo H.S. 529 534 540 549 556 544 535 532 Paterson 330 368 344 363 364 362 369 363 Tenafly H.S. 592 575 578 573 576 583 572 569 423 503 509 Atlantic City H.S. 429 432 434 430 421 441 432 493 481 513 Lakeland RHS 520 Pompton Lks H.S. 493 492 491 501 490 510 506 510 510 514 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 44
  • 45. SAT Verbal Rankings 2006-2013 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Atlantic City H.S. 429 432 434 430 421 441 432 423 Boonton H.S. 468 471 463 470 486 471 479 477 Butler H.S. 495 503 498 498 507 494 488 488 Indian Hills RHS 553 534 530 543 522 544 535 532 Jefferson H.S. 487 484 479 482 482 490 488 502 Kinnelon H.S. 530 538 543 532 535 541 519 528 Lakeland RHS 510 506 510 510 514 520 503 509 Passaic Valley RHS 465 473 461 483 474 469 469 481 Paterson 330 368 344 363 364 362 369 363 Pequannock Twp RHS 527 512 515 517 498 486 485 521 Pompton Lks H.S. 493 492 491 501 490 493 481 513 Ramapo H.S. 529 534 540 549 556 544 535 532 Tenafly H.S. 592 575 578 573 576 583 572 569 Wayne Hills H.S. 512 523 526 525 525 521 513 519 Wayne Valley H.S. 510 516 510 517 517 511 517 520 West Milford H.S. 503 490 488 501 478 496 481 497 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 45
  • 46. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 573 549 543 532 525 517 517 510 501 501 498 483 482 470 430 363 SAT Verbal Scores - 2010 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Butler H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 578 543 540 530 526 515 510 510 498 491 488 479 463 461 434 344 SAT Verbal Scores - 2011 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Lakeland RHS Butler H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 575 538 534 534 523 516 512 506 503 492 490 484 473 471 432 368 SAT Verbal Scores - 2012 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Indian Hills RHS Kinnelon H.S. Ramapo H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Wayne Hills H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 592 553 530 529 527 512 510 510 503 495 493 487 468 465 429 330 SAT Verbal Scores - 2013 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Jefferson H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 583 544 544 541 521 520 511 496 494 493 490 486 471 469 441 362 SAT Verbal Scores - 2008 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Indian Hills RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Butler H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Boonton H.S. Jefferson H.S. West Milford H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 576 556 535 525 522 517 514 507 498 490 486 482 478 474 421 364 SAT Verbal Scores - 2009 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 573 549 543 532 525 517 517 510 501 501 498 483 482 470 430 363 SAT Verbal Scores - 2010 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Butler H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 578 543 540 530 526 515 510 510 498 491 488 479 463 461 434 344 SAT Verbal Scores - 2011 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tenafly H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Pequannock Twp RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS Jefferson H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 569 532 532 528 521 520 519 513 509 502 497 488 481 477 423 363 SAT Verbal Scores - 2006 SAT Verbal Rankings 2006-2013 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 46
  • 47. SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S. 2 Indian Hills RHS Indian Hills RHS Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS 3 Ramapo H.S. Ramapo H.S. Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Kinnelon H.S. 4 Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Ramapo H.S. 5 Pequannoc k TWP RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Indian Hills RHS Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS 6 Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS Pequannoc k TWP RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. 7 Wayne Hills H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Pequannoc k TWP RHS Lakeland RHS 8 Pompton Lks H.S. Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Wayne Valley H.S. 9 Lakeland RHS Jefferson H.S. Butler H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Butler H.S. Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. 10 Jefferson H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Butler H.S. 11 West Milford H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. West Milford H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. 12 Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Jefferson H.S. Jefferson H.S. Jefferson H.S. 13 Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Boonton H.S. West Milford H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. 14 Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Passaic Valley RHS Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS 15 Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. 16 Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 47
  • 48. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate School District SAT Participation Pequannock 94.8% Kinnelon 94.0% Tenafly 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Oakland 91.0% Wayne Hills 88.7% Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Ringwood 83.5% Wanaque 83.5% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Bloomingdale 78.7% Butler 78.7% Pompton Lks 77.1% Riverdale 77.1% Lincoln Park 74.6% West Milford 73.9% Totowa 72.4% Margate City 68.4% Atlantic City 54.6% Ventnor City 68.4% School District SAT Participation Core Towns Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon 94.0% Riverdale Pompton Lks Oakland 91.0% Wanaque Ringwood West Milford 73.9% Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Wayne Hills 88.7% Wayne Valley 84.4% Core Town Neighbors Jefferson Twp 80.3% Montville 89.6% Totowa 72.4% Big Cities Paterson 88.1% Atlantic City 54.6% AC HS Sending Districts Margate City 54.6% Ventnor City Highest Scoring School in Study Tenafly 94.0% 78.7% 77.1% 83.5% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 48
  • 49. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate School District SAT Participation School District SAT Participation School District SAT Participation Core Towns Atlantic City 54.6% Pequannock 94.8% Bloomingdale Bloomingdale 78.7% Kinnelon 94.0% Butler Butler 78.7% Tenafly 94.0% Kinnelon 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Riverdale Jefferson Twp 80.3% Oakland 91.0% Pompton Lks Kinnelon 94.0% Wayne Hills 88.7% Oakland 91.0% Lincoln Park 74.6% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque Margate City 68.4% Wayne Valley 84.4% Ringwood Oakland 91.0% Ringwood 83.5% West Milford 73.9% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque 83.5% Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Pequannock 94.8% Pompton Lks 77.1% Bloomingdale 78.7% Wayne Hills 88.7% Ringwood 83.5% Butler 78.7% Wayne Valley 84.4% Riverdale 77.1% Pompton Lks 77.1% Core Town Neighbors Tenafly 94.0% Riverdale 77.1% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Totowa 72.4% Lincoln Park 74.6% Montville 89.6% Ventnor City West Milford 73.9% Totowa 72.4% Wanaque 83.5% Totowa 72.4% Big Cities Wayne Hills 88.7% Margate City 68.4% Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Atlantic City 54.6% Atlantic City 54.6% West Milford 73.9% Ventnor City 68.4% AC HS Sending Districts Margate City 54.6% Ventnor City Highest Scoring School in Study Tenafly 94.0% 78.7% 77.1% 83.5% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 49
  • 50. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 50 Narrowing the Achievement Gap General Literacy Data
  • 51. NJASK English-Speaking Students 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Comparative District Literacy Total CD Area Average Literacy Score CD Average English Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 51
  • 52. NJASK English-Speaking Students 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Comparison of English-Speaking Students Core Average Comparativ e District Average Total English Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 52
  • 53. NJASK English-Speaking Students Core Average Comparative District Average Total English 2006 89.0% 73.9% 83.4% 2007 89.5% 74.1% 83.8% 2008 90.5% 79.0% 86.3% 2009 88.2% 76.3% 83.8% 2010 86.7% 72.7% 81.6% 2011 89.2% 80.8% 86.1% 2012 88.5% 79.7% 85.3% 2013 88.9% 79.6% 85.5% Total Core Area Average Literacy Score Core Area Average English Total CD Area Average Literacy Score CD Average English Total English NJ Average U.S. Average 2006 88.4% 89.0% 80.2% 73.9% 83.4% 82.5% 68.0% 2007 86.2% 89.5% 80.9% 74.1% 83.8% 2008 88.5% 90.5% 83.0% 79.0% 86.3% 80.6% 66.2% 2009 74.1% 88.2% 67.6% 76.3% 83.8% 65.7% 2010 72.6% 86.7% 66.3% 72.7% 81.6% 82.7% 2011 75.4% 89.2% 66.2% 80.8% 86.1% 76.1% 66.8% 2012 67.2% 88.5% 61.6% 79.7% 85.3% 78.1% 61.9% 2013 70.6% 88.9% 66.7% 79.6% 85.5% 75.0% 70.6% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 53
  • 54. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 54

Related Documents