Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Core Area Grades 3 through 5
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3
School
District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oaklan...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%
2 Lincoln Pa...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%
2 Oakland 8...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%
2 Lincoln Pa...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8
2014 Kinnelon 93.3% 2014 Riverdale 94.5% 2014 Kinnelon 93.2%
201...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
2006
G...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11
2014 Gr. 3
1 Kinnelon 11.3%
2 Lincoln Park 6.9%
3 Riverdale 4.5...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12
2014 Gr. 4
1 Riverdale 13.6%
2 Butler 7.5%
3 Kinnelon 7.3%
4 Ri...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13
NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5
2014 Gr. 5
1...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14
Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking
2014 Kinnelon 11.3%
2013 Kinnelon...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15
Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock
Pom...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Comparative District Grades 3 throu...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18
School
District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin LakesPaterson Mar...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20
NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21
NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%
2
Jefferson
...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23
86.0%
87.0%
88.0%
89.0%
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24
-15.0%
-14.0%
-13.0%
-12.0%
-11.0%
-10.0%
-9.0%
-8.0%
-7.0%
-6....
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25
-50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26
NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3
2...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27
2010 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 18.8%
2
Franklin
Lakes 16.7%
3 Margate Cit...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28
2014 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 25.1%
2
Jefferson
Twp 24.0%
3
Franklin
Lak...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29
2014 Margate City 20.1%
2013
Franklin
Lakes 23.1%
2012 Tenafly ...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30
Comparison of Comparison District NJASK Math Score Changes
Fran...
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31
SAT
Math Scores
Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School District
SAT
Participation
School
District
SAT
Participation
School
Dis...
Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School
District
SAT
Participation
Pequannock 94.8%
Kinnelon 94.0%
Tenafly 94.0...
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
SAT Math Scores by School District 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. ...
SAT Math Rankings by Year 2006-2011
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenaf...
SAT Math Scores 2006-2013
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Butler H.S. 505 501 499 487 499 499 487 497
Kinnelon H.S...
SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013
Butler H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Indian
Hills RHS
Lakeland
RHS
West
Milford
H.S.
B...
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Ramapo H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
I...
of 38

NAG_Math

Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - NAG_Math

  • 1. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1 NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014 Core Area Grades 3 through 5
  • 2. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Grade 3 91.3% 92.1% 90.3% 84.1% 84.0% 87.1% 87.6% 83.0% 82.1% 86.8% Grade 4 91.1% 89.4% 88.4% 80.1% 86.9% 86.9% 85.2% 85.2% 82.1% 86.1% Grade 5 90.8% 90.8% 82.5% 85.0% 87.1% 88.0% 90.5% 86.5% 84.5% 87.3% NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014 Includes: Bloomingdale, Butler, Kinnelon, Lincoln Park, Oakland, Pequannock, Pompton Lakes, Ringwood, Riverdale, Wanaque, West Milford, and Wayne Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau Suburban Trends Area
  • 3. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3 School District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequannock Pompton Lks Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Core Area Average 2014 Gr. 3 81.0% 81.2% 93.3% 88.9% 81.6% 80.9% 84.9% 84.3% 86.5% 84.3% 67.7% 70.8% 82.1% Gr. 4 78.2% 88.4% 88.2% 82.5% 89.8% 79.5% 78.0% 84.3% 94.5% 82.4% 57.0% 78.6% 81.8% Gr. 5 78.5% 88.7% 93.2% 91.3% 87.1% 88.1% 88.6% 85.5% 77.8% 88.0% 59.5% 81.5% 84.0% 2013 Gr. 3 81.0% 86.0% 93.0% 88.0% 81.7% 89.0% 78.1% 80.0% 92.0% 80.0% 65.0% 82.0% 83.0% Gr. 4 79.9% 79.0% 90.0% 88.0% 76.3% 87.0% 77.4% 89.0% 93.0% 88.0% 85.0% 85.0% 84.8% Gr. 5 92.7% 91.0% 92.0% 96.0% 88.0% 81.0% 79.8% 86.0% 84.0% 87.0% 82.0% 84.5% 87.0% 2012 Gr. 3 90.0% 75.0% 91.0% 89.8% 90.3% 90.0% 79.0% 91.0% 91.0% 87.2% 85.0% 94.0% 87.8% Gr. 4 65.0% 93.0% 94.0% 92.0% 82.3% 75.0% 73.0% 94.0% 82.9% 88.5% 77.5% 83.4% Gr. 5 83.0% 91.0% 96.0% 98.0% 86.3% 90.0% 87.5% 80.0% 96.0% 88.1% 90.0% 92.5% 89.9% 2011 Gr. 3 85.9% 92.0% 95.8% 89.8% 86.9% 86.0% 81.7% 82.5% 82.2% 86.8% 81.3% 92.7% 87.0% Gr. 4 61.8% 79.5% 94.7% 94.1% 89.2% 91.0% 78.6% 80.6% 92.9% 84.1% 84.7% 86.3% 84.8% Gr. 5 73.3% 86.3% 94.2% 94.4% 81.2% 97.6% 84.6% 81.9% 89.3% 76.5% 89.7% 92.3% 86.8% 2010 Gr. 3 70.7% 84.6% 89.7% 95.2% 83.1% 88.1% 79.6% 81.9% 68.0% 78.1% 84.1% 91.8% 82.9% Gr. 4 75.3% 80.7% 89.2% 97.4% 81.4% 97.7% 77.6% 83.4% 82.1% 89.1% 87.8% 89.4% 85.9% Gr. 5 69.5% 89.0% 95.1% 93.4% 91.2% 90.7% 82.8% 87.0% 87.1% 83.7% 80.9% 77.1% 85.6% 2009 Gr. 3 78.1% 80.7% 83.5% 92.5% 83.5% 95.4% 61.8% 98.5% 86.2% 81.5% 81.0% 80.8% 83.6% Gr. 4 60.2% 73.0% 75.7% 91.1% 90.7% 88.7% 69.5% 79.4% 84.4% 66.3% 83.8% 78.1% 78.4% Gr. 5 60.7% 78.3% 92.8% 92.3% 89.8% 93.0% 79.1% 80.6% 88.2% 80.5% 80.0% 80.9% 83.0% 2008 Gr. 3 82.1% 90.8% 94.0% 95.4% 94.8% 92.6% 76.5% 93.8% 95.9% 83.9% 81.6% 94.3% 89.6% Gr. 4 86.7% 89.6% 95.1% 89.8% 92.4% 97.0% 74.5% 89.9% 83.9% 80.8% 87.7% 91.8% 88.3% Gr. 5 71.9% 75.4% 92.0% 91.8% 86.4% 86.2% 82.9% 75.5% 76.7% 74.7% 82.1% 83.4% 81.6% 2007 Gr. 3 87.1% 83.8% 99.4% 97.0% 95.8% 97.0% 96.3% 83.4% 90.6% 84.9% 91.7% 93.6% 91.7% Gr. 4 89.8% 91.0% 92.7% 94.9% 94.9% 90.3% 88.5% 88.9% 87.5% 72.7% 89.8% 91.9% 89.4% Gr. 5 75.4% 84.5% 98.0% 92.6% 98.4% 93.2% 89.9% 98.4% 89.7% 76.6% 87.9% 89.8% 89.5% 2006 Gr. 3 78.4% 92.7% 92.4% 96.1% 95.5% 96.6% 91.2% 88.3% 86.7% 87.0% 86.6% 91.3% 90.2% Gr. 4 86.2% 95.0% 93.2% 96.5% 97.1% 91.4% 90.7% 82.6% 93.1% 82.4% 92.2% 87.6% 90.7% Gr. 5 80.5% 79.6% 98.3% 81.6% 96.9% 92.1% 89.9% 87.5% 96.1% 90.9% 89.9% 96.3% 90.0% Core Study Area Score Averages 2006-2014 NJASK Math
  • 4. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 90.2% 90.7% 90.0% 91.7% 89.4% 89.5% 89.6% 88.3% 81.6% 83.6% 78.4% 83.0% 82.9% 85.9% 85.6% 87.0% 84.8% 86.8% 87.8% 83.4% 89.9% 83.0% 84.8% 87.0% 82.1% 81.8% 84.0% NJASK Math Core Area Averages by Grade
  • 5. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2% 2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3% 3 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8% 4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6% 5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5% 6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0% 7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 8 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7% 9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5% 10 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1% 11 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5% 12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0% 2 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0% 3 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0% 4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0% 5 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0% 6 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5% 7 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 8 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7% 9 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0% 10 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0% 11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8% 12 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5% 2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 3 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0% 4 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 5 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 6 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0% 7 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0% 8 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0% 9 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1% 10 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0% 11 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5% 12 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2% 2 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3% 3 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3% 4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4% 5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 6 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5% 7 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6% 8 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3% 9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9% 10 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3% 11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6% 12 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4% 2 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1% 3 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1% 4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7% 5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0% 6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9% 7 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 8 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0% 9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8% 10 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7% 11 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5% 12 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6% 2 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0% 3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3% 4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2% 5 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8% 6 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 7 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5% 8 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0% 9 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9% 10 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3% 11 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7% 12 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7% 2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8% 3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4% 5 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0% 6 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5% 7 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2% 8 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4% 9 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7% 10 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9% 11 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1% 12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0% 2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6% 3 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2% 4 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9% 5 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 6 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8% 7 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9% 8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7% 9 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4% 10 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6% 11 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5% 12 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1% 2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6% 3 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 4 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6% 5 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3% 6 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9% 8 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5% 9 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9% 10 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1% 11 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9% 12 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5% NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 3
  • 6. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8% 2 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7% 4 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2% 5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5% 6 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3% 7 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0% 8 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1% 9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5% 10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5% 11 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6% 12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0% 2 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0% 3 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0% 4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0% 5 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0% 6 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0% 7 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0% 8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5% 9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7% 10 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0% 11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8% 12 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 2 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 3 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0% 4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0% 5 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0% 6 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1% 7 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 8 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5% 9 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0% 10 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5% 11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0% 12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2% 2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4% 3 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3% 4 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6% 5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 6 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3% 7 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7% 8 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5% 9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9% 10 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3% 11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6% 12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7% 2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4% 3 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1% 4 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1% 5 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7% 6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9% 7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0% 8 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1% 9 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 10 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0% 11 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8% 12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3% 2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 3 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0% 4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2% 5 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0% 6 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6% 7 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9% 8 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8% 9 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3% 10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 11 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5% 12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2% 2 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0% 3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4% 5 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5% 6 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8% 7 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4% 8 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1% 9 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9% 10 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7% 11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7% 12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6% 3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0% 4 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8% 5 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5% 6 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2% 7 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4% 8 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9% 9 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4% 10 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9% 11 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7% 12 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6% 3 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6% 4 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3% 5 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1% 6 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9% 7 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1% 8 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9% 9 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 10 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5% 11 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5% 12 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9% NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 4
  • 7. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2% 2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3% 3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7% 4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6% 5 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1% 6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0% 7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1% 8 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5% 9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5% 10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5% 11 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8% 12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0% 2 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7% 3 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0% 4 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0% 5 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0% 6 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0% 7 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0% 8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5% 9 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0% 10 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0% 11 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0% 12 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0% 2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 3 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0% 4 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5% 5 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0% 6 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0% 7 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0% 8 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1% 9 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5% 10 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3% 11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0% 12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6% 2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4% 3 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2% 4 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3% 5 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7% 6 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3% 7 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3% 8 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6% 9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9% 10 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2% 11 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5% 12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1% 2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4% 3 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2% 4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7% 5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0% 6 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1% 7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0% 8 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7% 9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8% 10 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9% 11 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1% 12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0% 2 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8% 3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3% 4 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8% 5 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2% 6 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9% 7 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6% 8 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5% 9 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0% 10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1% 11 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3% 12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0% 2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8% 3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4% 4 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2% 5 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4% 6 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9% 7 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1% 8 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7% 9 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5% 10 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4% 11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7% 12 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4% 2 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4% 3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0% 4 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2% 5 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6% 6 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9% 7 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8% 8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7% 9 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9% 10 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5% 11 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6% 12 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3% 2 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9% 3 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3% 4 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1% 5 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1% 6 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9% 7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9% 8 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9% 9 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5% 10 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6% 11 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5% 12 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6% NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 5
  • 8. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8 2014 Kinnelon 93.3% 2014 Riverdale 94.5% 2014 Kinnelon 93.2% 2013 Kinnelon 93.0% 2013 Riverdale 93.0% 2013 Lincoln Park 96.0% 2012 West Milford 94.0% 2012 Kinnelon 94.0% 2012 Lincoln Park 98.0% 2011 Kinnelon 95.8% 2011 Kinnelon 94.7% 2011 Pequannock 97.6% 2010 Lincoln Park 95.2% 2010 Pequannock 97.7% 2010 Kinnelon 95.1% 2009 Ringwood 98.5% 2009 Lincoln Park 91.1% 2009 Pequannock 93.0% 2008 Riverdale 95.9% 2008 Pequannock 97.0% 2008 Kinnelon 92.0% 2007 Kinnelon 99.4% 2007 Oakland 94.9% 2007 Ringwood 98.4% 2006 Pequannock 96.6% 2006 Oakland 97.1% 2006 Kinnelon 98.3% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% KinnelonKinnelonWest Milford KinnelonLincoln ParkRingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonPequannock 201420132012201120102009200820072006 93.3% 93.0% 94.0% 95.8% 95.2% 98.5% 95.9% 99.4% 96.6% Core Area Grade 3 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% Riverdale Riverdale Kinnelon Kinnelon Pequannock Lincoln Park Pequannock Oakland Oakland 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 94.5% 93.0% 94.0% 94.7% 97.7% 91.1% 97.0% 94.9% 97.1% Core Area Grade 4 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% Kinnelon Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Pequannock Kinnelon Pequannock Kinnelon Ringwood Kinnelon 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 93.2% 96.0% 98.0% 97.6% 95.1% 93.0% 92.0% 98.4% 98.3% Core Area Grade 5 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Core Study Area Math First-Place Rankings by Year
  • 9. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9 -3.0% -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 0.0% 0.4%0.4% 0.5% 0.1% -2.6% 0.8% 0.3% 3.1% 2.8% 1.8% 1.3% 5.8% 6.0% 3.6% 5.2% 4.6% 5.5% 3.0% 3.9% 5.9% 1.2% 3.6% 4.3% 0.4%0.4% 1.7% NJASK Core Study Area Math Score Changes by Percent
  • 10. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10 -25.0% -20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 Comparison of Core Study Area NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford
  • 11. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11 2014 Gr. 3 1 Kinnelon 11.3% 2 Lincoln Park 6.9% 3 Riverdale 4.5% 4 Oakland 3.0% 5 Pompton Lakes 2.9% 6 Ringwood 2.3% 7 Wanaque 2.2% 8 Butler -0.8% 9 Bloomingdale -1.0% 10 Pequanock -1.1% 11 West Milford -11.2% 12 Wayne -14.3% 2013 Gr. 3 1 Kinnelon 11.0% 2 Riverdale 10.0% 3 Pequanock 7.0% 4 Lincoln Park 6.0% 5 Butler 4.0% 6 Oakland 2.0% 7 West Milford 0.0% 8 Bloomingdale -1.0% 9 Ringwood -2.0% 10 Wanaque -2.0% 11 Pompton Lakes -3.9% 12 Wayne -17.0% 2012 Gr. 3 1 West Milford 9.3% 2 Kinnelon 6.3% 3 Ringwood 6.3% 4 Riverdale 6.3% 5 Bloomingdale 5.3% 6 Pequanock 5.3% 7 Lincoln Park 5.1% 8 Oakland 4.3% 9 Wanaque 2.5% 10 Wayne 0.3% 11 Pompton Lakes -5.7% 12 Butler -9.7% 2011 Gr. 3 1 Oakland 13.9% 2 Kinnelon 13.2% 3 West Milford 10.1% 4 Butler 9.4% 5 Lincoln Park 7.2% 6 Wanaque 4.2% 7 Pequanock 3.4% 8 Bloomingdale 3.3% 9 Ringwood -0.1% 10 Riverdale -0.4% 11 Pompton Lakes -0.9% 12 Wayne -1.3% 2010 Gr. 3 1 Lincoln Park 17.7% 2 West Milford 14.3% 3 Kinnelon 12.2% 4 Pequanock 10.6% 5 Oakland 10.0% 6 Butler 7.1% 7 Wayne 6.6% 8 Ringwood 4.4% 9 Pompton Lakes 2.1% 10 Wanaque 0.6% 11 Bloomingdale -6.8% 12 Riverdale -9.5% 2009 Gr. 3 1 Ringwood 17.4% 2 Pequanock 14.3% 3 Lincoln Park 11.4% 4 Oakland 5.2% 5 Riverdale 5.1% 6 Kinnelon 2.4% 7 Wanaque 0.4% 8 Wayne -0.1% 9 West Milford -0.3% 10 Butler -0.4% 11 Bloomingdale -3.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -19.3% 2008 Gr. 3 1 Riverdale 5.8% 2 Pompton Lakes 5.4% 3 Lincoln Park 5.3% 4 West Milford 4.2% 5 Kinnelon 3.9% 6 Ringwood 3.7% 7 Pequanock 2.5% 8 Oakland 0.8% 9 Butler 0.7% 10 Wanaque -6.3% 11 Bloomingdale -8.0% 12 Wayne -8.5% 2007 Gr. 3 1 Kinnelon 8.0% 2 Oakland 6.3% 3 Pequanock 5.6% 4 Lincoln Park 5.6% 5 Pompton Lakes 4.9% 6 West Milford 2.2% 7 Wayne 0.3% 8 Riverdale -0.8% 9 Bloomingdale -4.3% 10 Wanaque -6.5% 11 Butler -7.6% 12 Ringwood -8.0% 2006 Gr. 3 1 Oakland 9.4% 2 Pequanock 6.0% 3 Lincoln Park 5.5% 4 Butler 2.1% 5 Kinnelon 1.8% 6 West Milford 0.7% 7 Pompton Lakes 0.6% 8 Ringwood -2.3% 9 Wanaque -3.7% 10 Riverdale -3.9% 11 Wayne -4.1% 12 Bloomingdale -12.2% NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3
  • 12. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12 2014 Gr. 4 1 Riverdale 13.6% 2 Butler 7.5% 3 Kinnelon 7.3% 4 Ringwood 3.4% 5 Oakland 3.3% 6 Lincoln Park 1.6% 7 Wanaque 1.5% 8 Pequanock -1.4% 9 West Milford -2.3% 10 Bloomingdale -2.7% 11 Pompton Lakes -2.9% 12 Wayne -23.9% 2013 Gr. 4 1 Riverdale 11.1% 2 Kinnelon 8.1% 3 Ringwood 7.1% 4 Lincoln Park 6.1% 5 Wanaque 6.1% 6 Pequanock 5.1% 7 Wayne 3.1% 8 Oakland 3.1% 9 West Milford 3.1% 10 Bloomingdale -2.0% 11 Butler -2.9% 12 Pompton Lakes -4.6% 2012 Gr. 4 1 Oakland 14.4% 2 Kinnelon 13.4% 3 Riverdale 13.4% 4 Butler 12.4% 5 Lincoln Park 11.4% 6 Wayne 7.9% 7 Wanaque 2.2% 8 West Milford -3.1% 9 Pequanock -5.6% 10 Pompton Lakes -7.6% 11 Bloomingdale -15.6% 12 Ringwood 2011 Gr. 4 1 Kinnelon 14.1% 2 Lincoln Park 13.5% 3 Oakland 12.7% 4 Riverdale 12.3% 5 Pequanock 10.4% 6 West Milford 5.7% 7 Wayne 4.1% 8 Wanaque 3.5% 9 Ringwood 0.0% 10 Butler -1.1% 11 Pompton Lakes -2.0% 12 Bloomingdale -18.8% 2010 Gr. 4 1 Pequanock 17.3% 2 Lincoln Park 17.0% 3 West Milford 9.0% 4 Kinnelon 8.8% 5 Wanaque 8.7% 6 Wayne 7.4% 7 Oakland 6.6% 8 Ringwood 3.0% 9 Riverdale 1.7% 10 Butler 0.3% 11 Pompton Lakes -2.8% 12 Bloomingdale -5.1% 2009 Gr. 4 1 Lincoln Park 14.5% 2 Oakland 14.3% 3 Pequanock 12.1% 4 Riverdale 7.8% 5 Wayne 7.2% 6 Ringwood 2.8% 7 West Milford 1.5% 8 Kinnelon -0.9% 9 Butler -3.6% 10 Pompton Lakes -7.1% 11 Wanaque -10.3% 12 Bloomingdale -16.4% 2008 Gr. 4 1 Pequanock 9.1% 2 Kinnelon 7.2% 3 West Milford 3.9% 4 Oakland 3.2% 5 Ringwood 2.0% 6 Lincoln Park 1.9% 7 Butler 1.7% 8 Wayne -0.2% 9 Bloomingdale -1.2% 10 Riverdale -4.0% 11 Wanaque -7.1% 12 Pompton Lakes -13.6% 2007 Gr. 4 1 Oakland 8.2% 2 Lincoln Park 5.3% 3 Kinnelon 3.1% 4 West Milford 2.3% 5 Butler 1.4% 6 Pequanock 0.7% 7 Bloomingdale 0.2% 8 Wayne 0.2% 9 Ringwood -0.7% 10 Pompton Lakes -1.1% 11 Riverdale -2.1% 12 Wanaque -16.9% 2006 Gr. 4 1 Lincoln Park 6.6% 2 Butler 5.1% 3 Kinnelon 3.3% 4 Riverdale 3.2% 5 Oakland 2.8% 6 Wayne 2.3% 7 Pequanock 1.5% 8 Pompton Lakes 0.7% 9 West Milford -2.3% 10 Bloomingdale -3.7% 11 Ringwood -7.3% 12 Wanaque -7.5% NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4
  • 13. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13 NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5 2014 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 10.9% 2 Lincoln Park 9.0% 3 Butler 6.4% 4 Pompton Lakes 6.3% 5 Pequanock 5.8% 6 Wanaque 5.7% 7 Oakland 5.2% 8 Ringwood 3.2% 9 West Milford -0.8% 10 Bloomingdale -3.8% 11 Riverdale -4.5% 12 Wayne -22.8% 2013 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 13.1% 2 Bloomingdale 9.8% 3 Kinnelon 9.1% 4 Butler 8.1% 5 Oakland 7.1% 6 Wanaque 4.1% 7 Ringwood 3.1% 8 West Milford 1.6% 9 Riverdale 1.1% 10 Wayne -0.9% 11 Pequanock -1.9% 12 Pompton Lakes -3.1% 2012 Gr. 5 1 Lincoln Park 13.7% 2 Kinnelon 11.7% 3 Riverdale 11.7% 4 West Milford 8.2% 5 Butler 6.7% 6 Oakland 6.7% 7 Pequanock 5.7% 8 Wayne 5.7% 9 Wanaque 3.7% 10 Pompton Lakes 3.2% 11 Bloomingdale -1.3% 12 Ringwood -4.3% 2011 Gr. 5 1 Pequanock 15.7% 2 Lincoln Park 12.5% 3 Kinnelon 12.3% 4 West Milford 10.4% 5 Wayne 7.8% 6 Riverdale 7.4% 7 Oakland 7.0% 8 Butler 4.4% 9 Pompton Lakes 2.6% 10 Ringwood 0.0% 11 Wanaque -5.4% 12 Bloomingdale -8.6% 2010 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 12.9% 2 Oakland 12.4% 3 Lincoln Park 11.2% 4 Pequanock 8.4% 5 Butler 6.7% 6 Riverdale 4.8% 7 Ringwood 4.7% 8 Wanaque 1.4% 9 Pompton Lakes 0.5% 10 Wayne -1.4% 11 West Milford -5.2% 12 Bloomingdale -12.8% 2009 Gr. 5 1 Pequanock 12.0% 2 Kinnelon 11.8% 3 Lincoln Park 11.3% 4 Riverdale 7.2% 5 Oakland 0.8% 6 West Milford -0.1% 7 Ringwood -0.4% 8 Wanaque -0.5% 9 Wayne -1.0% 10 Pompton Lakes -1.9% 11 Butler -2.7% 12 Bloomingdale -20.3% 2008 Gr. 5 1 Oakland 15.0% 2 Kinnelon 14.5% 3 Lincoln Park 14.3% 4 Pequanock 8.7% 5 West Milford 5.9% 6 Wayne 4.6% 7 Riverdale -0.8% 8 Ringwood -2.0% 9 Butler -2.1% 10 Wanaque -2.8% 11 Bloomingdale -5.6% 12 Pompton Lakes -13.4% 2007 Gr. 5 1 Ringwood 6.5% 2 Kinnelon 6.1% 3 Oakland 3.4% 4 Pequanock 1.3% 5 Lincoln Park 0.7% 6 Pompton Lakes -2.0% 7 West Milford -2.1% 8 Riverdale -2.2% 9 Wayne -4.0% 10 Butler -7.4% 11 Wanaque -15.3% 12 Bloomingdale -16.5% 2006 Gr. 5 1 Kinnelon 8.7% 2 Oakland 7.2% 3 West Milford 6.8% 4 Riverdale 6.5% 5 Pequanock 2.5% 6 Wanaque 1.3% 7 Pompton Lakes 0.3% 8 Wayne 0.3% 9 Ringwood -2.1% 10 Lincoln Park -8.0% 11 Bloomingdale -9.1% 12 Butler -10.0%
  • 14. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14 Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Kinnelon 11.3% 2013 Kinnelon 11.0% 2012 West Milford 9.3% 2011 Oakland 13.9% 2010 Lincoln Park 17.7% 2009 Ringwood 17.4% 2008 Riverdale 5.8% 2007 Kinnelon 8.0% 2006 Oakland 9.4% 2014 Riverdale 13.6% 2013 Riverdale 11.1% 2012 Oakland 14.4% 2011 Kinnelon 14.1% 2010 Pequanock 17.3% 2009 Lincoln Park 14.5% 2008 Pequanock 9.1% 2007 Oakland 8.2% 2006 Lincoln Park 6.6% Grade 4- First-Place Ranking Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Kinnelon 10.9% 2013 Lincoln Park 13.1% 2012 Lincoln Park 13.7% 2011 Pequanock 15.7% 2010 Kinnelon 12.9% 2009 Pequanock 12.0% 2008 Oakland 15.0% 2007 Ringwood 6.5% 2006 Kinnelon 8.7% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% KinnelonKinnelonWest Milford OaklandLincoln Park RingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonOakland 201420132012201120102009200820072006 11.3%11.0% 9.3% 13.9% 17.7%17.4% 5.8% 8.0% 9.4% Core Area Grade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% RiverdaleRiverdaleOaklandKinnelonPequanockLincoln Park PequanockOaklandLincoln Park 201420132012201120102009200820072006 13.6% 11.1% 14.4%14.1% 17.3% 14.5% 9.1% 8.2% 6.6% Core Area Grade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% KinnelonLincoln Park Lincoln Park PequanockKinnelonPequanockOaklandRingwoodKinnelon 201420132012201120102009200820072006 10.9% 13.1%13.7%15.7%12.9%12.0%15.0% 6.5% 8.7% Core Area Grade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Core Area First-Place Math Rankings by Percentage
  • 15. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15 Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Average 2014 Gr. 3 -1.0% -0.8% 11.3% 6.9% 3.0% -1.1% 2.9% 2.3% 4.5% 2.2% -14.3% -11.2% 0.4% Gr. 4 -2.7% 7.5% 7.3% 1.6% 3.3% -1.4% -2.9% 3.4% 13.6% 1.5% -23.9% -2.3% 0.4% Gr. 5 -3.8% 6.4% 10.9% 9.0% 5.2% 5.8% 6.3% 3.2% -4.5% 5.7% -22.8% -0.8% 1.7% 2013 Gr. 3 -1.0% 4.0% 11.0% 6.0% 2.0% 7.0% -3.9% -2.0% 10.0% -2.0% -17.0% 0.0% 1.2% Gr. 4 -2.0% -2.9% 8.1% 6.1% 3.1% 5.1% -4.6% 7.1% 11.1% 6.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.6% Gr. 5 9.8% 8.1% 9.1% 13.1% 7.1% -1.9% -3.1% 3.1% 1.1% 4.1% -0.9% 1.6% 4.3% 2012 Gr. 3 5.3% -9.7% 6.3% 5.1% 4.3% 5.3% -5.7% 6.3% 6.3% 2.5% 0.3% 9.3% 3.0% Gr. 4 -15.6% 12.4% 13.4% 11.4% 14.4% -5.6% -7.6% 13.4% 2.2% 7.9% -3.1% 3.9% Gr. 5 -1.3% 6.7% 11.7% 13.7% 6.7% 5.7% 3.2% -4.3% 11.7% 3.7% 5.7% 8.2% 5.9% 2011 Gr. 3 3.3% 9.4% 13.2% 7.2% 13.9% 3.4% -0.9% -0.1% -0.4% 4.2% -1.3% 10.1% 5.2% Gr. 4 -18.8% -1.1% 14.1% 13.5% 12.7% 10.4% -2.0% 0.0% 12.3% 3.5% 4.1% 5.7% 4.6% Gr. 5 -8.6% 4.4% 12.3% 12.5% 7.0% 15.7% 2.6% 0.0% 7.4% -5.4% 7.8% 10.4% 5.5% 2010 Gr. 3 -6.8% 7.1% 12.2% 17.7% 10.0% 10.6% 2.1% 4.4% -9.5% 0.6% 6.6% 14.3% 5.8% Gr. 4 -5.1% 0.3% 8.8% 17.0% 6.6% 17.3% -2.8% 3.0% 1.7% 8.7% 7.4% 9.0% 6.0% Gr. 5 -12.8% 6.7% 12.9% 11.2% 12.4% 8.4% 0.5% 4.7% 4.8% 1.4% -1.4% -5.2% 3.6% 2009 Gr. 3 -3.0% -0.4% 2.4% 11.4% 5.2% 14.3% -19.3% 17.4% 5.1% 0.4% -0.1% -0.3% 2.8% Gr. 4 -16.4% -3.6% -0.9% 14.5% 14.3% 12.1% -7.1% 2.8% 7.8% -10.3% 7.2% 1.5% 1.8% Gr. 5 -20.3% -2.7% 11.8% 11.3% 0.8% 12.0% -1.9% -0.4% 7.2% -0.5% -1.0% -0.1% 1.3% 2008 Gr. 3 -8.0% 0.7% 3.9% 5.3% 0.8% 2.5% 5.4% 3.7% 5.8% -6.3% -8.5% 4.2% 0.8% Gr. 4 -1.2% 1.7% 7.2% 1.9% 3.2% 9.1% -13.6% 2.0% -4.0% -7.1% -0.2% 3.9% 0.3% Gr. 5 -5.6% -2.1% 14.5% 14.3% 15.0% 8.7% -13.4% -2.0% -0.8% -2.8% 4.6% 5.9% 3.1% 2007 Gr. 3 -4.3% -7.6% 8.0% 5.6% 6.3% 5.6% 4.9% -8.0% -0.8% -6.5% 0.3% 2.2% 0.5% Gr. 4 0.2% 1.4% 3.1% 5.3% 8.2% 0.7% -1.1% -0.7% -2.1% -16.9% 0.2% 2.3% 0.1% Gr. 5 -16.5% -7.4% 6.1% 0.7% 3.4% 1.3% -2.0% 6.5% -2.2% -15.3% -4.0% -2.1% -2.6% 2006 Gr. 3 -12.2% 2.1% 1.8% 5.5% 9.4% 6.0% 0.6% -2.3% -3.9% -3.7% -4.1% 0.7% 0.0% Gr. 4 -3.7% 5.1% 3.3% 6.6% 2.8% 1.5% 0.7% -7.3% 3.2% -7.5% 2.3% -2.3% 0.4% Gr. 5 -9.1% -10.0% 8.7% -8.0% 7.2% 2.5% 0.3% -2.1% 6.5% 1.3% 0.3% 6.8% 0.4% Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK Math Score Changes
  • 16. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16 NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014 Comparative District Grades 3 through 5
  • 17. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg Grade 3 85.7% 87.4% 89.7% 78.2% 79.9% 79.3% 78.7% 80.2% 81.1% 82.2% Grade 4 80.9% 83.6% 85.5% 75.4% 77.3% 80.5% 78.1% 80.6% 79.3% 80.1% Grade 5 83.9% 82.8% 79.6% 78.6% 79.6% 82.5% 86.8% 81.9% 84.4% 82.2% Suburban Trends Area Comparative District Chart NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014 Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau Includes: Franklin Lakes, Jefferson Township, Margate City, Paterson (Select), Tenafly, Totowa and Ventnor City
  • 18. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18 School District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin LakesPaterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly Comparative Distr. Avg. 2014 Gr. 3 87.1% 82.2% 87.8% 60.4% 95.7% 65.5% 89.2% 81.1% Gr. 4 83.5% 81.9% 97.3% 61.2% 84.5% 56.1% 90.4% 79.3% Gr. 5 94.8% 77.1% 94.2% 60.6% 89.6% 78.7% 95.9% 84.4% 2013 Gr. 3 80.5% 84.0% 97.0% 56.0% 88.0% 65.0% 91.0% 80.2% Gr. 4 82.0% 83.0% 87.0% 53.3% 93.0% 71.0% 95.0% 80.6% Gr. 5 91.0% 73.0% 89.0% 59.3% 81.0% 81.0% 99.0% 81.9% 2012 Gr. 3 87.0% 80.0% 89.0% 54.0% 92.0% 61.0% 96.0% 78.7% Gr. 4 83.5% 73.0% 95.0% 52.3% 84.0% 59.0% 100.0% 78.1% Gr. 5 90.5% 87.0% 98.0% 64.0% 95.0% 80.0% 93.0% 86.8% 2011 Gr. 3 89.4% 74.5% 97.0% 47.1% 83.1% 67.0% 96.9% 79.3% Gr. 4 83.9% 80.0% 96.9% 55.4% 91.1% 59.2% 96.9% 80.5% Gr. 5 89.5% 76.2% 98.5% 52.6% 91.1% 75.4% 94.0% 82.5% 2010 Gr. 3 89.0% 76.0% 98.3% 53.9% 91.1% 59.8% 91.0% 79.9% Gr. 4 82.6% 76.0% 89.3% 51.5% 85.7% 64.4% 91.4% 77.3% Gr. 5 91.9% 77.0% 96.9% 41.2% 77.8% 75.5% 96.6% 79.6% 2009 Gr. 3 85.6% 69.9% 88.5% 42.1% 92.0% 75.5% 93.6% 78.2% Gr. 4 81.5% 70.6% 95.4% 46.5% 84.0% 64.4% 85.7% 75.4% Gr. 5 83.7% 63.4% 96.9% 46.4% 95.0% 67.0% 97.6% 78.6% 2008 Gr. 3 95.8% 93.5% 98.5% 58.5% 98.1% 89.3% 94.5% 89.7% Gr. 4 93.5% 80.5% 96.8% 58.0% 92.6% 76.8% 100.0% 85.5% Gr. 5 93.3% 69.4% 100.0% 51.5% 88.9% 58.8% 95.7% 79.6% 2007 Gr. 3 95.3% 84.7% 93.0% 61.7% 100.0% 79.6% 97.5% 87.4% Gr. 4 87.2% 76.7% 100.0% 55.0% 94.5% 71.7% 100.0% 83.6% Gr. 5 91.7% 78.8% 95.6% 56.4% 93.4% 63.6% 100.0% 82.8% 2006 Gr. 3 89.7% 84.3% 100.0% 61.2% 100.0% 68.8% 96.0% 85.7% Gr. 4 83.9% 71.3% 93.9% 53.8% 90.7% 74.2% 98.5% 80.9% Gr. 5 90.6% 81.7% 97.2% 46.6% 91.4% 82.5% 97.3% 83.9% NJASK Math Comparative District Score Averages 2006-2014
  • 19. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 80.0% 76.3% 82.8% 77.4% 79.6% 80.7% 70.5% 75.3% 84.9% 76.3% 77.8% 79.8% 76.8% 75.3% 76.7%76.5% 72.1% 75.5% 88.3% 83.6% 76.3% 86.5% 80.9% 80.6% 83.3% 78.7% 81.7% NJASK Math Comparative District Averages by Grade
  • 20. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20 NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 3 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6% 2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9% 3 Franklin Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8% 5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1% 6 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7% 7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0% 2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0% 4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0% 5 Jefferson Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0% 6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0% 7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0% 2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5% 5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0% 6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0% 7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5% 2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0% 3 Jefferson Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5% 4 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1% 5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2% 6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4% 7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0% 2 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9% 3 Jefferson Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3% 4 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7% 5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4% 6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8% 7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4% 2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 3 Jefferson Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7% 4 Franklin Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6% 5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8% 6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6% 7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2% 2 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4% 3 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3% 4 Jefferson Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6% 5 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7% 6 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5% 7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%
  • 21. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21 NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 4 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2% 2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9% 3 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6% 4 Jefferson Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8% 5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1% 6 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6% 7 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0% 2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0% 4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0% 5 Jefferson Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0% 6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0% 7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 96.0% 100.0% 93.0% 2 Jefferson Twp 89.0% 95.0% 98.0% 3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 4 Paterson 87.0% 83.5% 90.5% 5 Tenafly 80.0% 73.0% 87.0% 6 Totowa 61.0% 59.0% 80.0% 7 Ventnor City 54.0% 52.3% 64.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5% 2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0% 3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5% 5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2% 6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4% 7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7% 2 Franklin Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0% 3 Jefferson Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3% 4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9% 5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4% 6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8% 7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6% 2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4% 4 Jefferson Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7% 5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8% 6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6% 7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3% 2 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2% 3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4% 4 Jefferson Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6% 5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5% 6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7% 7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%
  • 22. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9% 2 Jefferson Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8% 3 Franklin Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2% 4 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6% 5 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7% 6 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1% 7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6% 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0% 2 Jefferson Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0% 4 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0% 5 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0% 6 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0% 7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3% 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0% 2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 3 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5% 5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0% 6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0% 7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0% 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5% 2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0% 3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5% 5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2% 6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4% 7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6% 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 2 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6% 2 Franklin Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9% 3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0% 4 Jefferson Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7% 5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0% 6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4% 7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4% 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0% 2 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7% 3 Jefferson Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3% 4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9% 5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4% 6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8% 7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5% 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0% 2 Franklin Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6% 3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4% 4 Jefferson Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7% 5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8% 6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6% 7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4% 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3% 2 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2% 3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4% 4 Jefferson Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6% 5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5% 6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7% 7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6% NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 5
  • 23. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23 86.0% 87.0% 88.0% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% Margate City TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes Margate City Franklin Lakes 201420132012201120102009200820072006 95.7% 91.0% 96.0% 97.0% 93.6%93.6% 98.5% 100.0%100.0% Comparative District Grade 3 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 92.0% 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% Margate City TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes Margate City Franklin Lakes 201420132012201120102009200820072006 97.3% 95.0% 100.0% 96.9% 95.4%95.4% 100.0%100.0% 98.5% Comparative District Grade 4 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 93.0% 94.0% 95.0% 96.0% 97.0% 98.0% 99.0% 100.0% Margate City TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes Margate City Franklin Lakes 201420132012201120102009200820072006 95.9% 99.0% 98.0% 98.5% 97.6%97.6% 100.0%100.0% 97.3% Comparative District Grade 5 First Place Math Rankings 2006-2014 Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking NJASK Comparative District Math First-Place Rankings By Year 2014 Franklin Lakes 97.3% 2013 Tenafly 95.0% 2012 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 2011 Franklin Lakes 96.9% 2010 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 2009 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 2008 Tenafly 100.0% 2007 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 2006 Tenafly 98.5% 2014 Margate City 95.7% 2013 Tenafly 91.0% 2012 Tenafly 96.0% 2011 Franklin Lakes 97.0% 2010 Tenafly 93.6% 2009 Tenafly 93.6% 2008 Franklin Lakes 98.5% 2007 Margate City 100.0% 2006 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 2014 Franklin Lakes 97.3% 2013 Tenafly 95.0% 2012 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 2011 Franklin Lakes 96.9% 2010 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 2009 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 2008 Tenafly 100.0% 2007 Franklin Lakes 100.0% 2006 Tenafly 98.5%
  • 24. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24 -15.0% -14.0% -13.0% -12.0% -11.0% -10.0% -9.0% -8.0% -7.0% -6.0% -5.0% -4.0% -3.0% -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 2006 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2007 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2008 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2009 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2010 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2011 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2012 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2013 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 2014 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5 -5.5% -9.7% -12.2% -4.3% -5.3% -14.6% -4.0% -4.9% 8.0% 4.4% -2.0% -4.3% 7.0% 2.6% 4.0% 5.4% 2.4% 8.8% -7.4% 8.1% 12.8% 3.5% 9.0% 7.4% 4.4% 2.9% 11.9% NJASK Comparative District Math Score Changes by Percent
  • 25. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25 -50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Franklin Lakes Jefferson Twp Margate City Paterson Tenafly Totowa Ventnor City Comparison of Comparative District NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent
  • 26. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26 NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3 2014 Gr. 3 1 Margate City 20.1% 2 Tenafly 13.6% 3 Franklin Lakes 12.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 11.5% 5 Totowa 6.6% 6 Ventnor City -10.1% 7 Paterson -15.2% 2013 Gr. 3 1 Franklin Lakes 23.1% 2 Tenafly 17.1% 3 Margate City 14.1% 4 Totowa 10.1% 5 Jefferson Twp 6.6% 6 Ventnor City -8.9% 7 Paterson -17.9% 2012 Gr. 3 1 Tenafly 18.1% 2 Margate City 14.1% 3 Franklin Lakes 11.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 9.1% 5 Totowa 2.1% 6 Ventnor City -16.9% 7 Paterson -23.9% 2011 Gr. 3 1 Franklin Lakes 26.1% 2 Tenafly 26.0% 3 Jefferson Twp 18.4% 4 Margate City 12.2% 5 Totowa 3.6% 6 Ventnor City -3.9% 7 Paterson -23.8% 2010 Gr. 3 1 Franklin Lakes 28.5% 2 Margate City 21.3% 3 Tenafly 21.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 19.2% 5 Totowa 6.2% 6 Ventnor City -10.0% 7 Paterson -15.9% 2009 Gr. 3 1 Tenafly 21.6% 2 Margate City 20.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 16.5% 4 Jefferson Twp 13.6% 5 Ventnor City 3.5% 6 Totowa -2.1% 7 Paterson -29.9% 2008 Gr. 3 1 Franklin Lakes 6.2% 2 Margate City 5.8% 3 Jefferson Twp 3.5% 4 Tenafly 2.2% 5 Totowa 1.2% 6 Ventnor City -3.0% 7 Paterson -33.8% 2007 Gr. 3 1 Margate City 9.3% 2 Tenafly 6.8% 3 Jefferson Twp 4.5% 4 Franklin Lakes 2.3% 5 Totowa -6.0% 6 Ventnor City -11.1% 7 Paterson -29.0% 2006 Gr. 3 1 Franklin Lakes 11.2% 2 Margate City 11.2% 3 Tenafly 7.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 0.9% 5 Totowa -4.5% 6 Ventnor City -20.0% 7 Paterson -27.6%
  • 27. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27 2010 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 18.8% 2 Franklin Lakes 16.7% 3 Margate City 13.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 9.9% 5 Totowa 3.4% 6 Ventnor City -8.2% 7 Paterson -21.1% 2009 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 21.3% 2 Tenafly 11.6% 3 Margate City 9.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 7.4% 5 Totowa -3.5% 6 Ventnor City -9.7% 7 Paterson -27.5% 2008 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 11.5% 2 Franklin Lakes 8.3% 3 Jefferson Twp 4.9% 4 Margate City 4.1% 5 Totowa -8.0% 6 Ventnor City -11.7% 7 Paterson -30.5% 2007 Gr. 3 1 Margate City 9.3% 2 Tenafly 6.8% 3 Jefferson Twp 4.5% 4 Franklin Lakes 2.3% 5 Totowa -6.0% 6 Ventnor City -11.1% 7 Paterson -29.0% 2014 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 24.0% 2 Tenafly 17.1% 3 Margate City 11.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 10.2% 5 Totowa 8.6% 6 Paterson -12.2% 7 Ventnor City -17.2% 2013 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 24.4% 2 Margate City 22.4% 3 Franklin Lakes 16.4% 4 Totowa 12.4% 5 Jefferson Twp 11.4% 6 Ventnor City 0.4% 7 Paterson -17.2% 2012 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 32.8% 2 Franklin Lakes 27.8% 3 Margate City 16.8% 4 Jefferson Twp 16.3% 5 Totowa 5.8% 6 Ventnor City -8.2% 7 Paterson -14.9% 2011 Gr. 4 1 Franklin Lakes 21.5% 2 Tenafly 21.5% 3 Margate City 15.7% 4 Jefferson Twp 8.5% 5 Totowa 4.6% 6 Ventnor City -16.2% 7 Paterson -20.0% 2006 Gr. 4 1 Tenafly 10.1% 2 Franklin Lakes 5.5% 3 Margate City 2.3% 4 Jefferson Twp -4.6% 5 Ventnor City -14.2% 6 Totowa -17.1% 7 Paterson -34.6% NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4
  • 28. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28 2014 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 25.1% 2 Jefferson Twp 24.0% 3 Franklin Lakes 23.4% 4 Margate City 18.8% 5 Ventnor City 7.9% 6 Totowa 6.3% 7 Paterson -10.3% 2013 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 25.6% 2 Jefferson Twp 17.6% 3 Franklin Lakes 15.6% 4 Margate City 7.6% 5 Ventnor City 7.6% 6 Totowa -0.4% 7 Paterson -14.0% 2012 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 25.9% 2 Margate City 22.9% 3 Tenafly 20.9% 4 Jefferson Twp 18.4% 5 Totowa 14.9% 6 Ventnor City 7.9% 7 Paterson -8.1% 2011 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 27.5% 2 Tenafly 23.0% 3 Margate City 20.1% 4 Jefferson Twp 18.5% 5 Totowa 5.2% 6 Ventnor City 4.4% 7 Paterson -18.4% 2010 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 24.2% 2 Tenafly 23.9% 3 Jefferson Twp 19.2% 4 Margate City 5.1% 5 Totowa 4.3% 6 Ventnor City 2.8% 7 Paterson -31.5% 2009 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 17.8% 2 Franklin Lakes 17.1% 3 Margate City 15.2% 4 Jefferson Twp 3.9% 5 Ventnor City -12.8% 6 Totowa -16.4% 7 Paterson -33.4% 2008 Gr. 5 1 Franklin Lakes 31.7% 2 Tenafly 27.4% 3 Jefferson Twp 25.0% 4 Margate City 20.6% 5 Totowa 1.1% 6 Ventnor City -9.5% 7 Paterson -16.8% 2007 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 4.7% 2 Franklin Lakes 0.3% 3 Margate City -1.9% 4 Jefferson Twp -3.6% 5 Totowa -16.5% 6 Ventnor City -31.7% 7 Paterson -38.9% 2006 Gr. 5 1 Tenafly 3.4% 2 Franklin Lakes 3.3% 3 Margate City -2.5% 4 Jefferson Twp -3.4% 5 Ventnor City -11.4% 6 Totowa -12.2% 7 Paterson -47.3% NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5
  • 29. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29 2014 Margate City 20.1% 2013 Franklin Lakes 23.1% 2012 Tenafly 18.1% 2011 Franklin Lakes 26.1% 2010 Franklin Lakes 28.5% 2009 Tenafly 21.6% 2008 Franklin Lakes 6.2% 2007 Margate City 9.3% 2006 Franklin Lakes 11.2% Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Franklin Lakes 24.0% 2013 Tenafly 24.4% 2012 Tenafly 18.1% 2011 Tenafly 32.8% 2010 Franklin Lakes 21.5% 2009 Tenafly 18.8% 2008 Franklin Lakes 21.3% 2007 Tenafly 11.5% 2006 Tenafly 10.1% Grade 4 - First-Place Ranking 2014 Tenafly 25.1% 2013 Tenafly 25.6% 2012 Franklin Lakes 25.9% 2011 Franklin Lakes 27.5% 2010 Franklin Lakes 24.2% 2009 Tenafly 17.8% 2008 Franklin Lakes 31.7% 2007 Tenafly 4.7% 2006 Tenafly 3.4% Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% 22.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 29.0% 30.0% Margate City Franklin Lakes TenaflyFranklin Lakes Franklin Lakes TenaflyFranklin Lakes Margate City Franklin Lakes 201420132012201120102009200820072006 20.1% 23.1% 18.1% 26.1% 28.5% 21.6% 6.2% 9.3% 11.2% Comparative District Grade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% 22.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 29.0% 30.0% 31.0% 32.0% 33.0% Franklin Lakes TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyTenafly 201420132012201120102009200820072006 24.0%24.4% 18.1% 32.8% 21.5% 18.8% 21.3% 11.5% 10.1% Comparative District Grade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% 22.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 29.0% 30.0% 31.0% 32.0% TenaflyTenaflyFranklin Lakes Franklin Lakes Franklin Lakes TenaflyFranklin Lakes TenaflyTenafly 201420132012201120102009200820072006 25.1% 25.6%25.9% 27.5% 24.2% 17.8% 31.7% 4.7% 3.4% Comparative District Grade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings 2006-2014 NJASK Comparative District First-Place Math Score Changes by Percentage
  • 30. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30 Comparison of Comparison District NJASK Math Score Changes Franklin LakesJefferson Twp Margate City Paterson Tenafly Totowa Ventnor City Comparative Distr. Avg. 2014 Gr. 3 12.2% 11.5% 20.1% -15.2% 13.6% 6.6% -10.1% 4.4% Gr. 4 24.0% 10.2% 11.2% -12.2% 17.1% 8.6% -17.2% 2.9% Gr. 5 23.4% 24.0% 18.8% -10.3% 25.1% 6.3% 7.9% 11.9% 2013 Gr. 3 23.1% 6.6% 14.1% -17.9% 17.1% 10.1% -8.9% 3.5% Gr. 4 16.4% 11.4% 22.4% -17.2% 24.4% 12.4% 0.4% 9.0% Gr. 5 15.6% 17.6% 7.6% -14.0% 25.6% -0.4% 7.6% 7.4% 2012 Gr. 3 11.1% 9.1% 14.1% -23.9% 18.1% 2.1% -16.9% -7.4% Gr. 4 27.8% 16.3% 16.8% -14.9% 32.8% 5.8% -8.2% 8.1% Gr. 5 25.9% 18.4% 22.9% -8.1% 20.9% 14.9% 7.9% 12.8% 2011 Gr. 3 26.1% 18.4% 12.2% -23.8% 26.0% 3.6% -3.9% 5.4% Gr. 4 21.5% 8.5% 15.7% -20.0% 21.5% 4.6% -16.2% 2.4% Gr. 5 27.5% 18.5% 20.1% -18.4% 23.0% 5.2% 4.4% 8.8% 2010 Gr. 3 28.5% 19.2% 21.3% -15.9% 21.2% 6.2% -10.0% 7.0% Gr. 4 16.7% 9.9% 13.1% -21.1% 18.8% 3.4% -8.2% 2.6% Gr. 5 24.2% 19.2% 5.1% -31.5% 23.9% 4.3% 2.8% 4.0% 2009 Gr. 3 16.5% 13.6% 20.0% -29.9% 21.6% -2.1% 3.5% 4.4% Gr. 4 21.3% 7.4% 9.9% -27.5% 11.6% -3.5% -9.7% -2.0% Gr. 5 17.1% 3.9% 15.2% -33.4% 17.8% -16.4% -12.8% -4.3% 2008 Gr. 3 6.2% 3.5% 5.8% -33.8% 2.2% 1.2% -3.0% -4.0% Gr. 4 8.3% 4.9% 4.1% -30.5% 11.5% -8.0% -11.7% -4.9% Gr. 5 31.7% 25.0% 20.6% -16.8% 27.4% 1.1% -9.5% 8.0% 2007 Gr. 3 2.3% 4.5% 9.3% -29.0% 6.8% -6.0% -11.1% -4.3% Gr. 4 13.8% 1.0% 8.3% -31.2% 13.8% -9.5% -14.5% -5.3% Gr. 5 0.3% -3.6% -1.9% -38.9% 4.7% -16.5% -31.7% -14.6% 2006 Gr. 3 11.2% 0.9% 11.2% -27.6% 7.2% -4.5% -20.0% -5.5% Gr. 4 5.5% -4.6% 2.3% -34.6% 10.1% -17.1% -14.2% -9.7% Gr. 5 3.3% -3.4% -2.5% -47.3% 3.4% -12.2% -11.4% -12.2%
  • 31. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31 SAT Math Scores
  • 32. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate School District SAT Participation School District SAT Participation School District SAT Participation Core Towns Atlantic City 54.6% Pequannock 94.8% Bloomingdale Bloomingdale 78.7% Kinnelon 94.0% Butler Butler 78.7% Tenafly 94.0% Kinnelon 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Riverdale Jefferson Twp 80.3% Oakland 91.0% Pompton Lks Kinnelon 94.0% Wayne Hills 88.7% Oakland 91.0% Lincoln Park 74.6% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque Margate City 68.4% Wayne Valley 84.4% Ringwood Oakland 91.0% Ringwood 83.5% West Milford 73.9% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque 83.5% Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Pequannock 94.8% Pompton Lks 77.1% Bloomingdale 78.7% Wayne Hills 88.7% Ringwood 83.5% Butler 78.7% Wayne Valley 84.4% Riverdale 77.1% Pompton Lks 77.1% Core Town Neighbors Tenafly 94.0% Riverdale 77.1% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Totowa 72.4% Lincoln Park 74.6% Montville 89.6% Ventnor City West Milford 73.9% Totowa 72.4% Wanaque 83.5% Totowa 72.4% Big Cities Wayne Hills 88.7% Margate City 68.4% Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Atlantic City 54.6% Atlantic City 54.6% West Milford 73.9% Ventnor City 68.4% AC HS Sending Districts Margate City 54.6% Ventnor City Highest Scoring School in Study Tenafly 94.0% 78.7% 77.1% 83.5% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32
  • 33. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate School District SAT Participation Pequannock 94.8% Kinnelon 94.0% Tenafly 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Oakland 91.0% Wayne Hills 88.7% Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Ringwood 83.5% Wanaque 83.5% Jefferson Twp 80.3% Bloomingdale 78.7% Butler 78.7% Pompton Lks 77.1% Riverdale 77.1% Lincoln Park 74.6% West Milford 73.9% Totowa 72.4% Margate City 68.4% Atlantic City 54.6% Ventnor City 68.4% School District SAT Participation Core Towns Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon 94.0% Riverdale Pompton Lks Oakland 91.0% Wanaque Ringwood West Milford 73.9% Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Wayne Hills 88.7% Wayne Valley 84.4% Core Town Neighbors Jefferson Twp 80.3% Montville 89.6% Totowa 72.4% Big Cities Paterson 88.1% Atlantic City 54.6% AC HS Sending Districts Margate City 54.6% Ventnor City Highest Scoring School in Study Tenafly 94.0% 78.7% 77.1% 83.5% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33
  • 34. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 SAT Math Scores by School District 2006-2013 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34
  • 35. SAT Math Rankings by Year 2006-2011 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. Tenafly H.S. 2 Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS 3 Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. 4 Indian Hills RHS Indian Hills RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Ramapo H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Indian Hills RHS 5 Ramapo H.S. Ramapo H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Indian Hills RHS Indian Hills RHS Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. 6 Kinnelon H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Wayne Valley Pequannoc k TWP RHS Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. 7 Pompton Lks H.S. Boonton H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Pequannoc k TWP RHS Wayne Valley Pequannoc k TWP RHS Wayne Valley H.S. 8 Pequannoc k TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS Pequannoc k TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. 9 Jefferson H.S. Jefferson H.S. Jefferson H.S. Lakeland RHS Lakeland RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS Lakeland RHS 10 West Milford H.S. West Milford H.S. Pequannoc k TWP RHS Boonton H.S. West Milford H.S. West Milford H.S. West Milford H.S. West Milford H.S. 11 Passaic Valley RHS Pequannoc k TWP RHS West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Butler H.S. Butler H.S. Butler H.S. 12 Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Jefferson H.S. Jefferson H.S. 13 Boonton H.S. Lakeland RHS Passaic Valley RHS Passaic Valley RHS Butler H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Passaic Valley RHS 14 Lakeland RHS Butler H.S. Boonton H.S. Jefferson H.S. Boonton H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Boonton H.S. 15 Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Atlantic City H.S. 16 Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35
  • 36. SAT Math Scores 2006-2013 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Butler H.S. 505 501 499 487 499 499 487 497 Kinnelon H.S. 567 564 575 557 559 579 532 543 Pompton Lks H.S. 527 528 518 535 541 548 503 539 Indian Hills RHS 560 546 539 556 538 541 542 546 Lakeland RHS 520 515 521 520 513 516 493 492 West Milford H.S. 509 503 500 512 496 504 501 514 Boonton H.S. 491 494 499 481 502 490 516 497 Pequannock TWP HS 573 536 539 546 517 513 500 539 Wayne Hills H.S. 555 566 569 568 565 569 549 566 Wayne Valley H.S. 555 550 536 554 559 553 556 555 Jefferson H.S. 505 500 494 502 494 515 503 523 Passaic Valley RHS 501 496 489 503 496 496 494 502 Ramapo H.S. 559 546 561 566 570 541 542 546 Paterson 340 377 395 408 398 398 404 410 Atlantic City H.S. 461 450 449 447 441 468 454 444 Tenafly H.S. 652 632 636 640 630 623 619 620 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36
  • 37. SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013 Butler H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Indian Hills RHS Lakeland RHS West Milford H.S. Boonton H.S. Pequanno ck TWP RHS Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Ramapo H.S. Paterson Atlantic City H.S. Tenafly H.S. SAT NJ Ranking 2011 143 37 121 60 97 156 201 77 50 91 179 208 43 274 266 5 2013 505 567 527 560 520 509 491 573 555 555 505 501 559 340 461 652 2012 501 564 528 546 515 503 494 536 566 550 500 496 546 377 450 632 2011 499 575 518 539 521 500 499 539 569 536 494 489 561 395 449 636 2010 487 557 535 556 520 512 481 546 568 554 502 503 566 408 447 640 2009 499 559 541 538 513 496 502 517 565 559 494 496 570 398 441 630 2008 499 579 548 541 516 504 490 513 569 553 515 496 541 398 468 623 2007 487 532 503 542 493 501 516 500 549 556 503 494 542 404 454 619 2006 497 543 539 546 492 514 497 539 566 555 523 502 546 410 444 620 SAT Participatio n Rate 78.7% 94.0% 77.1% 91.0% 83.5% 73.9% 74.6% 94.8% 88.7% 84.0% 80.3% 72.4% 92.2% 88.1% 94.0% Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37
  • 38. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Indian Hills RHS Pequannock TWP RHS Lakeland RHS Boonton H.S. Butler H.S. West Milford H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Jefferson H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 630 570 565 559 559 541 538 517 513 502 499 496 496 494 441 398 SAT Math Scores - 2009 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Boonton H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Jefferson H.S. West Milford H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS Passaic Valley RHS Lakeland RHS Butler H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 619 556 549 542 542 532 516 503 503 501 500 494 493 487 454 404 SAT Math Scores - 2007 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS Jefferson H.S. West Milford H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Butler H.S. Boonton H.S. Lakeland RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 620 566 555 546 546 543 539 539 523 514 502 497 497 492 444 410 SAT Math Scores - 2006 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Lakeland RHS Jefferson H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 623 579 569 553 548 541 541 516 515 513 504 499 496 490 468 398 SAT Math Scores - 2008 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 652 573 567 560 559 555 555 527 520 509 505 505 501 491 461 340 SAT Math Scores - 2013 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Valley H.S. Indian Hills RHS Ramapo H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 632 566 564 550 546 546 536 528 515 503 501 500 496 494 450 377 SAT Math Scores - 2012 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Ramapo H.S. Indian Hills RHS Pequannock TWP RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Lakeland RHS Pompton Lks H.S. West Milford H.S. Butler H.S. Boonton H.S. Jefferson H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 636 575 569 561 539 539 536 521 518 500 499 499 494 489 449 395 SAT Math Scores - 2011 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Tenafly H.S. Wayne Hills H.S. Ramapo H.S. Kinnelon H.S. Indian Hills RHS Wayne Valley H.S. Pequannock TWP RHS Pompton Lks H.S. Lakeland RHS West Milford H.S. Passaic Valley RHS Jefferson H.S. Butler H.S. Boonton H.S. Atlantic City H.S. Paterson 640 568 566 557 556 554 546 535 520 512 503 502 487 481 447 408 SAT Math Scores - 2010 SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013 Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38

Related Documents