NAICS 562998 - All Other Miscellaneous
NAICS Code 562998 Industry Report - Identify current and future All Other Miscellaneous Waste Management Services opportunities to win government contracts
Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Transcripts - NAICS 562998 - All Other Miscellaneous
NAICS 562998All Other MiscellaneousWaste ManagementServices federal contractsGovernment Contract and Procurement Analysis ReportThis report takes an in-depth look at the All Other Miscellaneous Waste Management Servicesindustry, NAICS 562998. epipelines Contract History Plus* provides you with a broad context andseveral perspectives that enable you to develop the best positioning and strategy for your company tomore effectively compete for government contracts. The following graph illustrates one suchperspective: the top Government departments/agencies buying these services over the last four fiscalyears.WHAT IS NAICS 562998?This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in providing waste management services(except waste collection, waste treatment and disposal, remediation, operation of materials recoveryfacilities, septic tank pumping and related services, and waste management consulting services).The description of NAICS 562998 is further broken out to include these additional specific topics: Beach maintenance and cleaning services federal contracts Catch basin cleaning services federal contracts Grease trap cleaning federal contracts Sewer cleaning and rodding services federal contracts Sewer cleanout services federal contracts Storm basin cleanout services federal contracts Tank cleaning and disposal services, commercial or industrial federal contractsPlease be aware that establishments primarily engaged in collecting and/or hauling waste within a localarea are classified in Industry 56211, Waste Collection; Long-distance trucking of waste is classified inIndustry 484230, Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Long-Distance; operating
treatment or disposal facilities (except sewer systems or sewage treatment facilities) for waste isclassified in Industry 56221, Waste Treatment and Disposal; collecting, treating and disposing wastethrough sewer systems or sewage treatment facilities is classified in Industry 221320, SewageTreatment Facilities; the remediation and cleanup of contaminated buildings, mine sites, soil, or groundwater is classified in Industry 562910, Remediation Services; operating facilities for separating andsorting recyclable materials from nonhazardous waste streams (i.e., garbage) or for sorting commingledrecyclable materials, such as paper, plastics, and metal cans, into distinct categories is classified inIndustry 562920, Materials Recovery Facilities; pumping (i.e., cleaning) cesspools, portable toilets andseptic tanks or renting portable toilets is classified in U.S. Industry 562991, Septic Tank and RelatedServices; and providing waste management consulting services, such as developing remedial actionplans is classified in Industry 541620, Environmental Consulting Services.The size standard associated with NAICS 562998 is $7.0 Million (effective November 5, 2010), whichmeans that a company, including its affiliates, would be considered a "small business" if their averageannual gross receipts does not exceed $7 Million for the past three years.Total reported spending under NAICS 562998 for the period of Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) through FiscalYear 2011 (FY11) was nearly $70.4 million. FY11 reported spending of $1.1 million for services underNAICS 562998. The chart below illustrates the reported** spending by year for FY07 through FY11. Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*** Note: it is possible that some Defense spending for the more recent fiscal years (FY06 to present) isnot as widely reported as earlier years. These numbers will likely increase as more departments andagencies report their current and historic contract spending.WHO ISSUES THE CONTRACTS?The Department of the Army was the largest procurer for these services for the last five fiscal years(FY07 through FY11), with more than $28.5 million in contract spending, comprising 40.5% of themarket share for NAICS 562998. The Bureau of Prisons took the second spot, with almost $10 millionin reported spending for this period. The Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navytook third and fourth places, respectively, making up a combined market share of 24.6% for allspending in NAICS 562998.
The Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Park Service spent $3.7 million and $2.4 millionrespectively during this time period with the rest of the top ten reporting spending just under $4.7million for NAICS 562998. Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*WHO WINS THE CONTRACTS?According to the Central Contractor Registry (CCR), there are 3,724 companies registered underNAICS 562998 (source: active registrants, www.ccr.gov as of 11/28/2011). Of this number, 2,049qualify as small businesses, which includes the following breakout by socioeconomic categories (somecompanies may qualify under more than one category): 196 SBA Certified 8(a) contractors; 102 SBA Certified HUBZone contractors; and 292 Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB).NOTE, the CCR website states, "As of the July 30, 2008 release (4.08.2), CCR-registered vendors mayelect not to display their registration in the CCR/FedReg Public Search." This could mean that there aremore active contractors registered with the CCR than the resulting totals above represent.The two charts below identify the top 10 Companies, by market share, for the period of FY07 throughFY11. The first chart represents the top 10 companies that were awarded their contracts under ANYtype of competition, whether it was full and open, small business set-aside, sole-sourced, etc. This listprimarily consists of large businesses. The second chart, however, lists the top 10 companies that wontheir contracts under RESTRICTED competition. Specifically, epipeline limited this to those contractsawarded under the acquisition strategies listed below. The contract dollars represented on this secondchart may not include all contract dollars for the individual contractor. 8(a) Competed 8(a) Small Disadvantaged (SDB) set-aside 8(a) sole-source SDB set-aside SDB, 8(a) with HUBZone Combination HUBZone and 8(a) HUBZone set-aside HUBZone sole-source Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside SDVOSB sole-source
Emerging Small Business set-aside Very Small Business set-aside Reserved for Small Businesses ($2501 to $100,000) Total Small Business set-asideAshbritt Inc achieved the top spot on the unrestricted competition list, with over $7.6 million incontract dollars for FY07 to FY11 and more than 10.8% of market share. Gregg Township MunicipalAuthority landed over $4.4 million in contract dollars with SPSA LLC earning roughly $2.6 million.Beckley City Of WV and Afco Technologies Inc round out the top five with $2.0 and $1.4 million,respectively. Seven additional firms, Tutka LLC, Kantoh Kosan Company Limited, Veetech PC, BlackGold Industries, City Of Victorville, Downstream Services and Chang Shin Corporation Co, eachtopped $1 million in contracting dollars for this same time period.PLEASE NOTE: as this is a listing by Company name, rather than PARENT company, somecompanies may have more than one ranking, which may not be reflected in the chart below. Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*The combined contract spending for contracts awarded under "restricted competition," as outlinedabove, totaled over $27.2 million for FY07 through FY11. Afco Technologies Inc takes the top spot,with reported spending of over $1.4 million for this period, or 5.33% of market share. Tutka LLC alsosecured more than $1.4 million in contracting dollars for this time period. Two other firms in the topten, Veetech PC and Black Gold Industries, also exceeded $1 million in reported spending for NAICS562998.It should be noted that Afco Technologies Inc, Tutka LLC, Veetech PC and Black Gold Industries are allfound in both the top ten contractors using unrestricted competition as well as restricted competitionwith $5.5 million in combined contract dollars for FY07 through FY11.PLEASE NOTE: as this is a listing by Company name, rather than PARENT company, somecompanies may have more than one ranking, which may not reflected in the chart below.
Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*HOW ARE THESE CONTRACTS PROCURED?55.8% of contract spending reported for the FY07 through FY11 timeframe under NAICS 562998 usedfull and open (unrestricted aka "N/A") competition. This equated to almost $39.3 million. Contractsthat did not indicate their acquisition strategy (which means they could represent any acquisitionstrategy) reported contract spending of more than $7.9 million. Contracts that were small business set-aside reported spending of almost $10.2 million. The combined value of contracts representing all otheracquisition strategies was more than $13.4 million, or 19.46% of the market. Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*WHERE ARE THESE CONTRACTS PERFORMED?These contracts are being performed across the continental United States and abroad. The 50 states plusWashington, DC have reported spending for the FY07 through FY11 period of $54.4 million andcontracts for locations outside the United States (or unlisted) totaled $16 million.The highest total of reported contract spending is reported for Louisiana, with $9.5 million. California($7.9 million) and Pennsylvania ($5.3 million) took the second and third spots. Together, the top fivestates represent 39.60% of market under NAICS 562998. Besides those in the top ten, an additional 6states (Texas, District of Columbia, Ohio, New York, Massachusetts and Virginia) reported at least $1
million for NAICS 562998 during this time period. Source: epipelines Contract History Plus*