DECISION DOCUMENT GENERAL FORMAT• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• OPTIONS CONSIDERED• COST BE...
DECISION DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARYONE PAGE SUMMARY • Brief High Level Narrative • Vendor Ranking Table • Three...
DECISION DOCUMENT SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• PROJECT SCOPE - Defines Boundaries• GENERAL HIGH LEVEL REQUIREMENTS - Gener...
DECISION DOCUMENT OPTIONS CONSIDERED• VENDOR CRITERIA• REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS• WEIGHTED REQUIREMENT SCHEME• VENDOR ...
DECISION DOCUMENT VENDOR CRITERIA• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS• GO OR NO-GO VENDOR CUTOFF
DECISION DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS – Detailed for Evaluation Scores• MAY INCLUDE NICE-T...
DECISION DOCUMENTWEIGHTED REQUIREMENTS SCHEME• RANK MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS - Assign numerical weights• RANK NICE-TO-HAV...
DECISION DOCUMENTVENDOR RANKING/RECOMMENDATION • MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS TABLE - Total by Must Have Rqmts • MUST HAVE R...
DECISION DOCUMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS• VENDOR COST COMPARISONS• THREE YEAR COST PROJECTION – Return On Investment (...
DECISION DOCUMENT RESOURCE IMPACT• PERSONNEL RESOURCES• COMPUTER RESOURCES• IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – RECOMMENDED TEAM ...
DECISION DOCUMENT RESULTS USING THIS METHOD• HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS - General to Specific• FACILITATES AGREEMENT - A...
of 11

Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - Nacada team process 2012 (steve)

  • 1. DECISION DOCUMENT GENERAL FORMAT• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• OPTIONS CONSIDERED• COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS• RESOURCE IMPACT
  • 2. DECISION DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARYONE PAGE SUMMARY • Brief High Level Narrative • Vendor Ranking Table • Three Year Cost Projection • Recommended SolutionAPPROVALS PAGE • Decision Makers/Funding People • Key Implementers
  • 3. DECISION DOCUMENT SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS• PROJECT SCOPE - Defines Boundaries• GENERAL HIGH LEVEL REQUIREMENTS - General Definitions
  • 4. DECISION DOCUMENT OPTIONS CONSIDERED• VENDOR CRITERIA• REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS• WEIGHTED REQUIREMENT SCHEME• VENDOR RANKING• VENDOR RECOMMENDATION
  • 5. DECISION DOCUMENT VENDOR CRITERIA• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS• GO OR NO-GO VENDOR CUTOFF
  • 6. DECISION DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTIONS• MUST HAVE REQUIREMENTS – Detailed for Evaluation Scores• MAY INCLUDE NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS
  • 7. DECISION DOCUMENTWEIGHTED REQUIREMENTS SCHEME• RANK MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS - Assign numerical weights• RANK NICE-TO-HAVE OPTIONS - Assign numerical weights
  • 8. DECISION DOCUMENTVENDOR RANKING/RECOMMENDATION • MUST HAVE/DETAILED RQMTS TABLE - Total by Must Have Rqmts • MUST HAVE RQMTS SUMMARY TABLE • RECOMMENDATION
  • 9. DECISION DOCUMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS• VENDOR COST COMPARISONS• THREE YEAR COST PROJECTION – Return On Investment (ROI)• COST BENEFITS SUMMARY
  • 10. DECISION DOCUMENT RESOURCE IMPACT• PERSONNEL RESOURCES• COMPUTER RESOURCES• IMPLEMENTATION PLAN – RECOMMENDED TEAM – SCHEDULE OF EVENTS – POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
  • 11. DECISION DOCUMENT RESULTS USING THIS METHOD• HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS - General to Specific• FACILITATES AGREEMENT - All Organizations Including IT• DOCUMENTS DIRECTION - Excellent Communication Tool

Related Documents