Why Porsche Cayenne ?
Porsche Cayenne Vs.Q7 M Class Evoque Sport
Match # 1Porsche Cayenne Mercedes-Benz M-Class Vs.
US News Ratings Mercedes-Benz M-Class ...
Specs Comparison Mercedes-Benz M-Class ManualTransmission ...
Price Check Porsche Cayenne & Mercedes-Benz M-Class PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/car...
Transmission Mercedes-Benz M-Class* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomati...
What Customers have to say !!! Mercedes-Benz M-Class ...
User’s Comment #1 Mercedes-Benz M-Class The worst vehicle I ever own. ...
User’s Comment # 2 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Look ...
User’s Comment #3 Mercedes-Benz M-ClassBenz if you think I made this up, contact me!by Quocnamon 10/20/12C...
User’s Comment #4 Mercedes-Benz M-Classnot reliable carby alex limon 03/29/12Purchased As NewNot very relia...
User’s Comment #5 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Mercedes ...
Research Sources Used for Review Mercedes-Benz M-Class• AutoWeek http://www.autoweek...
Match # 2Porsche Cayenne Audi Q 7 Vs.
US News Ratings Audi Q 7 ...
Specs Comparison Audi Q 7 ManualTransmission Automati...
Price Check Porsche Cayenne & Audi Q7 PKR 17,941,400 PKR 13,000,400...
Transmission Audi Q 7* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Tr...
What Customers have to say !!! Audi Q 7 ...
User’s Comment # 1 Audi Q 7I would chose another modelBy Jpat0973 (OH) on Friday, August 24, 2012"T...
User’s Comment # 2 Audi Q 7 Lemon By Psalsa (Irvine,ca) on Friday, April 13, 2007 2.0 overall rating 2 o...
Audi Q7"Its looking a bit dated now,....................................................… The maindemerits are sub-par car...
Audi Q7“Mediocre fuel economy with 3.0T, surprisingly small third row and cargo bay, agingand needlessly heavy underpinnin...
Research Sources Used for Review Audi Q 7Autobloghttp://www.autoblog.com/2010...
Match # 3Porsche Cayenne Turbo Range Rover Sport Vs.
US News Ratings Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover Sport ...
Specs Comparison Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover SportTransmission Automatic Au...
Price Check Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover Sport PKR 29,035,500Cost ~...
Transmission Range Rover SportAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode6-Speed Automatic ...
What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Sport ...
User’s Comment # 1 Range Rover SportI was told It had Quality Issues - They wererightBy eduwad (...
User’s Comment # 2 Range Rover Sport POOR GAS MILAGE By rovingtiger (HI) on Thursday, March 22, 2012 ...
User’s Comment # 3 Range Rover SportNo TrustBy Gary on 04/02/10 21:34 PM (PDT)Vehicle2010 Land Rover R...
Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Sport• Car and Driver http://bu...
Match # 4Porsche Cayenne Range Rover Evoque Vs.
US News Ratings Range Rover Evoque ...
Specs Comparison Range Rover Evoque ManualTransmission ...
Price Check Porsche Cayenne &Range Rover Evoque PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/po...
Transmission Range Rover Evoque* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomati...
What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Evoque ...
User’s Comment # 1 Range Rover Evoque Worst car By eEK (IL) on Thursday, February 07, 2013 I own this ...
User’s Comment # 2 Range Rover Evoque Disappointed By Auntie (MA) on Wednesday, November 21, 2012 I own ...
User’s Comment # 3 Range Rover EvoqueGarbage car , very poor customer service by vick on 04/1...
User’s Comment # 4 Range Rover EvoqueWaste of Money by Ricky on 10/13/2012.Trim: 2012 Land Ro...
Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Evoque• See the full 2013 Land Rove...
of 46

Porsche cayennepresentation

Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - Porsche cayennepresentation

  • 1. Why Porsche Cayenne ?
  • 2. Porsche Cayenne Vs.Q7 M Class Evoque Sport
  • 3. Match # 1Porsche Cayenne Mercedes-Benz M-Class Vs.
  • 4. US News Ratings Mercedes-Benz M-Class WinnerOverall 8.2 7.6Critics Rating 8.1 7.6Performance 8.4 6.8  Interior 8.2 7.2Reliability 3.5 3.5 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632
  • 5. Specs Comparison Mercedes-Benz M-Class ManualTransmission Automatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel Drive Rear Wheel Drive  Fuel/Engine Gas V6 3.6L/220 Gas V6 3.5L/213MPG 15 City / 22 Hwy 18 City / 23 Hwy
  • 6. Price Check Porsche Cayenne & Mercedes-Benz M-Class PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche- ~1.65 Curor cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.html
  • 7. Transmission Mercedes-Benz M-Class* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode7-Speed Automatic  Manual6-Speed Manual
  • 8. What Customers have to say !!! Mercedes-Benz M-Class • Conservative exterior • COMAND interface • Indecisive shifts (Bluetec) Cons: "Annoying ergonomics, balky transmission." Cons: "Bit pricey, laggy acceleration, not as sporty" Cons: "HID lights should be standard." Cons: "Terrible Bluetooth phone quality" Cons: "Coolant leaked 4 times...bought is brand new 2 months ago :(" http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/mercedes-benz_m-class_2013
  • 9. User’s Comment #1 Mercedes-Benz M-Class The worst vehicle I ever own. By neversummer78 on 10/04/12 16:14 PM (PDT) Vehicle 2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML350 BlueTEC 4dr SUV AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbodiesel 7A) Review I purchased my 2012 ML350 Bluetec back in November 2011. After 2 weeks, the first problem I had was car was pulling to the right at highway speed. After left it with the dealer for about a week, they finally realized that it was bad tire which took them a few more days to get replacement. Next, I was having problem with car loosing power when driving over a long distance or for a few hours. There is no error message on the dashboard nor that the dealer can replicate. Anyway, I start documenting them on video using my phone. They finally acknowledge but still no solution for it. Along with the car loosing power, I was getting error with PRE-SAFE Inoperative error and Ad-Blue low levelhttp://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-consumer_reviews/?vehicleid=379345&intent=buy-new&p=1&perpage=5&sort=0&r=179227532018904960
  • 10. User’s Comment # 2 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Look elsewhere.....Mercedes has lost its edge By mabcpa1 on 01/04/12 19:01 PM (PST) Vehicle 2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML350 4MATIC 4dr SUV AWD (3.5L 6cyl 7A) Review Recently leased the new 2012 ML 350 and what a disappointment. Interior fit and finish not up to usual Mercedes quality and required replacement parts.....on a new Mercedes. Ride is terrible. There is a problem with the rear suspension that makes this car bounce like crazy over any little road bump and the dealer claims there is nothing wrong. The precise handling I have read about in other reviews of this car is completely lacking in the car I got......my Honda minivan drove with less effort!!! I am so sorry I got this car and especially at over $700 per month for the lease. The BMW X5 drives much, much better. Maybe I should just go back to my Honda!!!http://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-consumer_reviews/?vehicleid=379345&intent=buy-new&p=1&perpage=5&sort=0&r=179227532018904960
  • 11. User’s Comment #3 Mercedes-Benz M-ClassBenz if you think I made this up, contact me!by Quocnamon 10/20/12Cons Coolant leaked 4 times...bought it brand new 2 months ago :(Purchased As NewGreat looking car, great interior, been in the service department 4 times within thepast 2 months to refill the coolant....now they want to take the car apart to figureout this coolant situation...oh and the engine knocks now...we are hesitant now toeven think about taking it out of town. First time buying a benz, and realizedsomething everybody should know bf buying one: "if you are going to buy a benz, donot use it for road trips, city driving only...get rid of it before warranty expired"
  • 12. User’s Comment #4 Mercedes-Benz M-Classnot reliable carby alex limon 03/29/12Purchased As NewNot very reliable car. A month after purchase, the car does not start at ashopping center. So called emergency service person, he could not start the careither. He said something is wrong with a key. So I had to bring a extra key fromhome to start the car. About 2 months later, the car had fuel injection problems.So it stayed in MB service center for 10 days for repair. Few weeks after I got mycar back, while driving, the car had another engine problem and stopped in themiddle of road. It was towed to MB service center for 14 days for another repair.This car was in MB service center for over 3 weeks since I had it for 4 months.
  • 13. User’s Comment #5 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Mercedes Should Be Ashamed.............. By glacierdon on 06/01/09 10:05 AM (PDT) Vehicle 2000 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML430 4dr SUV AWD Review Its apparent that the 2000 ML 430 is a lemon. I have gone on various sites and people from all over are having the same exact problems. The windows wont roll down, the doors wont lock, the brakes always need replacing, the exterior lights are always blowing, the power steering went out, the sun roof gets stuck, the interior is coming apart, and now when I stop at lights it cuts off and wont start for about 30 to 40 minutes. this happens at least once a week. From my understanding these vehicles were built in the U.S. If I wanted an American car I would have bought a Ford. Mercedes should do a recall on these vehicles. The repairs needed on the vehicle are more than its worth. Seriously!http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2000/consumer-reviews/mercedes-should-be-ashamed...............html?style=17814&sub=&reviewId=5112c6a538e7829e0275f16a
  • 14. Research Sources Used for Review Mercedes-Benz M-Class• AutoWeek http://www.autoweek.com/article/20110713/CARREVIEWS/110719946• Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class-1.htm• EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.shtml• EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=32846&id=33279&id=32851• Inside Line http://www.insideline.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2012/2012-mercedes-benz-ml350-first-drive.html• Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-expert_car_reviews/? vehicl...• Manufacturer Warranty http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/service_and_parts/warranty• Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1201_2013_mercedes_benz_ml63_amg_first_drive/• powertrain warranty https://secure.drivers.lexus.com/lexusdrivers/info/my-lexus/service/warranty.do
  • 15. Match # 2Porsche Cayenne Audi Q 7 Vs.
  • 16. US News Ratings Audi Q 7 WinnerOverall 8.2 7.7Critics Rating 8.1 7.8Performance 8.4 7.3  Interior 8.2 6.8Reliability 3.5 3.0 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632
  • 17. Specs Comparison Audi Q 7 ManualTransmission Automatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive   Supercharged Gas V6 3.0L/Fuel/Engine Gas V6 3.6L/220 183MPG 15 City / 22 Hwy 16 City / 22 Hwy
  • 18. Price Check Porsche Cayenne & Audi Q7 PKR 17,941,400 PKR 13,000,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche- http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/audi/audi-q7-q7- cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.html detail.html http://www.audi.com.pk/sea/brand/pk/models/q7.html
  • 19. Transmission Audi Q 7* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode8-Speed Automatic  Manual6-Speed Manual
  • 20. What Customers have to say !!! Audi Q 7 • Gas mileage isnt great with the supercharged V-6 • Its heavy, and feels like it • Prices can rise quickly with options Cons: "Brake job at 50,000 miles was expensive" Cons: "Repair cost are high without warranty" Cons: "Small 3rd Row Seating, Gas Guzzler" Cons: "noisy, quirky, slow, poor quality, high maint cost" http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/audi_q7_2013
  • 21. User’s Comment # 1 Audi Q 7I would chose another modelBy Jpat0973 (OH) on Friday, August 24, 2012"To put it nicely, I would choose a different vehicle. I owned this car for a year and was astounded at thetechnical, engineering, quality and performance deficiencies in this car. The ride quality was below what Iwould expect for an entry level SUV. Every crack or ripple in the pavement could shake a filling out of yourteeth. I get "sport" suspension- this was something else. Every seem, seat joint and panel in the interiorrattled when you hit a bump- which obviously was often. The MMI system controls are clumsy and far tooattention grabbing to be safe. They are also located directly in front of the cupholders yet have no gusseting toprevent the smallest of spills to fry the entire MMI system that runs every feature in…read more http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/
  • 22. User’s Comment # 2 Audi Q 7 Lemon By Psalsa (Irvine,ca) on Friday, April 13, 2007 2.0 overall rating 2 of 10rating details Reviewer Ratings "I bought the car almost two months ago.It has been at the dealers for repair three times total of more than 20 days.Still at the dealer.Piece of a junk.I would never recommend it." http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/
  • 23. Audi Q7"Its looking a bit dated now,....................................................… The maindemerits are sub-par cargo space and 3rd-row room, and interior trimthat doesnt quite live up to the high standards weve come to expectfrom an Audi." -- Consumer Guide http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/
  • 24. Audi Q7“Mediocre fuel economy with 3.0T, surprisingly small third row and cargo bay, agingand needlessly heavy underpinnings.” - AutoTrader Review http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/
  • 25. Research Sources Used for Review Audi Q 7Autobloghttp://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/27/first-drive-2011-audi-q7-downsizes-with-an-upside/Automobile Magazinehttp://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1005_2011_audi_q7/index.htmlCar and Driverhttp://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q2/2011_audi_q7_3.0t_supercharged-first_drive_reviewCar and Driverhttp://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/acura_mdx_vs._audi_q7_3.0t_bmw_x5_xdrive35i_lan...Consumer Guidehttp://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2013-audi-q7-1.htmEdmundshttp://www.edmunds.com/audi/q7/2013Kelley Blue Bookhttp://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/Manufacturer Warrantyhttp://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/owners/benefits.html#source=http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/ow...Motor Trendhttp://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1005_2011_audi_q7_3_0t_first_drive/index.html
  • 26. Match # 3Porsche Cayenne Turbo Range Rover Sport Vs.
  • 27. US News Ratings Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover Sport WinnerOverall 8.2 7.8Critics Rating 8.1 7.9Performance 8.4 8.2  Interior 8.2 8.0Reliability 3.5 3.0 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632
  • 28. Specs Comparison Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover SportTransmission Automatic AutomaticDrivetrain All Wheel Drive Four Wheel Drive   Turbocharged Gas V8Fuel/Engine Gas V8 5.0L/305 4.8L/293MPG 15 City / 22 Hwy 13 City / 18 Hwy
  • 29. Price Check Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover Sport PKR 29,035,500Cost ~2.35 Curor * Pakwheels.com
  • 30. Transmission Range Rover SportAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode6-Speed Automatic  Manual8-Speed Automatic
  • 31. What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Sport • Ride can be harsh • Low, low gas mileage • Small cargo area, tight knee room "It remains massively heavy and the fuel economy is woeful, but its still a joy to drive and ride in." -- Car and Driver "Despite its elaborate technology, our Range Rover Sport underwhelmed in snow." -- Cars.com (2012) Cons: "Poor quality of the car and of service, it breaks!" Cons: "no voice command for this year model." Cons: "poor gas and bulky" http://www.thecarconnection.com/review/1076225_2013-land-rover-range-rover-sport_green_7
  • 32. User’s Comment # 1 Range Rover SportI was told It had Quality Issues - They wererightBy eduwad (FL) on Friday, August 10, 2012"I purchased this Range Sport HSE, although I was told that Land Rovers had Quality Issues.The car is so beautifull and drives so well that I could not resist it! What a Mistake! I keephaving quality issues on: the bearings, the dashboard clock, the parking brake, now its thesteering.... What next??? It is a shame, since the car is great, but I am terribly sorry for mypurchase decision."
  • 33. User’s Comment # 2 Range Rover Sport POOR GAS MILAGE By rovingtiger (HI) on Thursday, March 22, 2012 I own this car - My approximate mileage is 42,300 "looks good on the outside, it is more of a status symbol and not a performance or dependability type vehicle. The automatic height sensors went out at 41000 miles without any warning. Thankfully, it was still on warranty otherwise, I would of payed $2000 . This vehicle can be fun but the interior seems to be bulky, cumbersome and is more size than substance. I believe there are beter vehiclesof this nature out there like the 2012-13 Ford explore with equal or better bells and whistles. Ohh and better gas milage without having to feed it premium fuel. good luck to those seeking this vehicle."
  • 34. User’s Comment # 3 Range Rover SportNo TrustBy Gary on 04/02/10 21:34 PM (PDT)Vehicle2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE 4dr SUV 4WD (5.0L 8cyl 6A)ReviewThis SUV has left my wife locked out three times. I have driven with out turn signals andthe mirrors turned in parking position. No air conditioning, no Navigation no radio and hasspent 20 plus days in the shop in less then 5000 miles. The windows dont always close andit may not find the "smart key for 30 minutes which means it wont start until it does butthe alarm is sounding for the duration. We know any drive is our last but if we dont getkilled by the police because they think we are stealing it, some bad people will kill us whilewe wait for the "smart key" the alerts them easy prey. My favorite was a scary guy askingmy wife if she needs help in a Fort Lauderdale garage at night.
  • 35. Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Sport• Car and Driver http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/land-rover-range-rover-sport• Cars.com http://www.cars.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/expert-reviews/• Cars.com http://www.cars.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2012/expert-reviews/• Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2012-land-rover-range-rover-sport.htm• EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2013&year2=2013...• Edmunds http://www.edmunds.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/• Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013-land-rover-range-rover-sport/?r=242126950201013...• Manufacturer Warranty http://www.landrover.com/us/en/rr/owners/care-and-maintenance/limited-warranty/
  • 36. Match # 4Porsche Cayenne Range Rover Evoque Vs.
  • 37. US News Ratings Range Rover Evoque WinnerOverall 8.2 8.1Critics Rating 8.1 8.7Performance 8.4 8.2  Interior 8.2 6.5Reliability 3.5 2.5 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632
  • 38. Specs Comparison Range Rover Evoque ManualTransmission Automatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive   Turbocharged Gas I4 2.0L/Fuel/Engine Gas V6 3.6L/220 122MPG 15 City / 22 Hwy 18 City / 28 Hwy
  • 39. Price Check Porsche Cayenne &Range Rover Evoque PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche- ~ PKR 1.30 Curor cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.html
  • 40. Transmission Range Rover Evoque* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode6-Speed Automatic  Manual6-Speed Manual
  • 41. What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Evoque • Sporty SUV still a logic trap • Pricey, even for a Euro ute • Turbo fours gristly noises Cons: "Everything else" Cons: "New model bugs, could use more storage" Cons: "Interior not as luxurious for the money" Cons: "Limited storage when back seats are not folded." http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/land-rover_range-rover-evoque_2013
  • 42. User’s Comment # 1 Range Rover Evoque Worst car By eEK (IL) on Thursday, February 07, 2013 I own this car - My approximate mileage is 1,125 "Bought car January 2. Towed after 1 week. All warning lights came on no power steering, car would not shift to another gear. Everything. Took one week to repair. Module replaced. Smart keys stopped working this week. Called everyone to complain. Called first time and this time also. Said I have warranty and they stand behind. No help. Poor service to make sure car one month old repaired. I have owned 20 cars from for focus to Infiniti and this is the worst. Car towed again today."
  • 43. User’s Comment # 2 Range Rover Evoque Disappointed By Auntie (MA) on Wednesday, November 21, 2012 I own this car - My approximate mileage is 5,500 "I am disappointed with my Evoque. I have had it 4 months and it has been back to the dealer twice within two weeks. It has 5,500 miles but now I am having issues with the tires and coolant. When the temperature drops more than 10 degrees, the tires lose air and the sensor light comes on. The dealer has had to fill the tires twice so far. The next thing that just happened was the coolant light came on. Brought it in again and it needed coolant. Dealer said to expect to bring it back a few more times. For the money I paid, I am disgusted and thinking of trading it already. Now I am thinking I should have gotten the Infinit FX35 or FX50 or the Lexus."
  • 44. User’s Comment # 3 Range Rover EvoqueGarbage car , very poor customer service by vick on 04/11/12Cons its a land roverPurchased As NewBiggest piece of garbage, never buy a landrover!!!! the worst brand ever. verypoor customer service. run run fast and dont look back. very poor reliability
  • 45. User’s Comment # 4 Range Rover EvoqueWaste of Money by Ricky on 10/13/2012.Trim: 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus 5-Door.Cons:Everything else. Temperamental, seatbelt in front hard to insert, driver window to high forATM or drive up. Towed 2 times and have had one month.Overall review:Bought car January 2. Towed one week later. Took one week to replace module. Called landrover and did receive $500 in land rover certificates. This week both smart keys stoppedworking. Made appt. to repair and called land rover. Said I have warranty and certificatesone time. Not helpful or willing to go extra mile to help with car repair. Today car wouldnot start and car towed again. Land Rover has terrible service and pretty much yourproblem even if car 1 month old. I regret the purchase of this car.
  • 46. Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Evoque• See the full 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque specs http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/ Land-Rover_Range-Rover-Evoque/2013/specs/• AutoWeek http://www.autoweek.com/article/20110411/CARNEWS/110419992• Car and Driver http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/11q3/2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque-first_drive_review• Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-1.htm• EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33333• EPA http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33333• Edmunds http://www.edmunds.com/land-rover/range-rover-evoque/2012/• Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/land-rover/range-rover-evoque/2013-land-rover-range-rover-evoque/• Manufacturer Warranty http://www.landrover.com/us/en/lr/owners/care-and-maintenance/limited-warranty/• Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1108_2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque_test/viewall.html• Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1104_2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque_drive/index.html• Popular Mechanics http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/reviews/drives/2012-range-rover-evoque-test-drive• Road and Track http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/drives/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque

Related Documents