NALS 2007 - Game Design as an Educational Pedagogy
Clesson, K., Adams, M. & Barbour, M. K. (2007, October). Game design as an educational pedagogy. Paper presented at the annual National Association of Laboratory Schools Symposium, Johnson City , TN.
Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Transcripts - NALS 2007 - Game Design as an Educational Pedagogy
Game Design asEducational Pedagogy Kathy Clesson & Meghan Adams University High School – Normal, IL Michael K. Barbour Wayne State University Detroit, MI
Video Games & Digital Media • Today’s student has: – spent fewer than 5,000 hours of their lives reading – more than 10,000 hours playing video games – another 10,000 on their cell phones – more than 20,000 watching television Prensky (2006)Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me mom – I’m learning! St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
What Does School Have To Offer?Thursday - January 18, 2007http://wiscassetnewspaper.maine.com/2007-01-18/media_marketing.html
An alternative Pedagogy• schools typically have access to PowerPoint• teachers already have some facility with the tool• students are also familiar with the tool• everyone would like to be Its better because its homemade! able to use it for more than just another PowerPoint presentation
British Literature Project• 2 sections of the same course – approximately 20 students in one section (treatment) – approximately 15 students in second session (control)• taught essentially an online course in a laptop supported environment• unit on Shakespeare, comprising of two novel studies
The Study• Conducted on the second novel study• Control Group – students worked in small groups to review the novel by using traditional methods the teacher has used in the past• Treatment Group – worked in groups to create PPT Game
Methodology• used scores from the first novel study exam as pre-test scores• used scores from this second novel study as post-test• compared improvement of student scores in the treatment group with the control group
Findings• from a statistical standpoint, there were no significant difference in student performance (F value = 0.090 / α = 0.766)Summary of Student Performance Data Control Group Experiment GroupPre-Test 78.83% 76.61%Post-Test 85.14% 84.36%Average Difference + 6.32% + 7.75%
Conclusions• homemade PowerPoint Games can be as effective a pedagogical strategy as the other learning activities commonly utilized• very small sample size (n=35)• extrapolate out the same difference in scores over a sample of 700 the difference in improvement becomes statistically significant
Its better because its homemade!http://it.coe.uga.edu/wwild/pptgames/index.html
Contact InformationKathy Clesson Teacher University High School – Normal, IL email@example.comMichael K. Barbour Assistant Professor Wayne State University – Detroit, MI firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.michaelbarbour.com