Evaluation of Basic Life SupportRetention Rate in a two year studyAuthor:Dr. Mihai Negrea, MDCoordinators:Dr. Cristian Boe...
What do We do?• OSMU and SMURD - Mures Training Center organizetogether Emergency Medicine Courses for over 5 years• ALS S...
Why do we do it?• Over 380 thousand people haveCardiac Arrest every year in USA• Over 700 thousand people havecardiac arre...
This are our Goals• To make efficientcourses• To have an efficient,reliable, cheap methodof evaluation• To have long term ...
How?• We have built a micro-websitefor testing and data collectionwww.osmu.ro/testare• We used an web based emailservice (...
2 LotsMarisiensis 2011• 25 dentistry students• BLS plus elements of ALS• Theoretic Course, Practicewith instructors anddem...
What we did?Marisiensis:• We’ve tested them onpaper after course• Online 6 month, 1year, 2 yearsVolunteers:• We’ve tested ...
Average correct response rate092.175.5 78.8 78.3609389 86.500102030405060708090100Marisiensis 2011Volunteers
But…• We had low responserates• Volunteer lot: 36-40%• Marisiensis 2011: 20-28%
Conclusions• We teach very efficient BLS courses over 92% averagein post-Course testing• For those who participate in the ...
We are good at teaching
And some other aspects• Although online evaluation ischeap, reliable, efficient we still have to find outhow to make peopl...
The End
Prezentare marisiensis
of 14

Prezentare marisiensis

a study about how knowledge evolves over time. Specifically in Basic life support measures
Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - Prezentare marisiensis

  • 1. Evaluation of Basic Life SupportRetention Rate in a two year studyAuthor:Dr. Mihai Negrea, MDCoordinators:Dr. Cristian Boeriu, PHD,Dr. Emilia Turucz, MD
  • 2. What do We do?• OSMU and SMURD - Mures Training Center organizetogether Emergency Medicine Courses for over 5 years• ALS Summer School Is the largest&complex programon medical education for students• Training for SMURD Volunteers• Training for non medical persons: Pupils, schoolteachers, kindergarten children, adults
  • 3. Why do we do it?• Over 380 thousand people haveCardiac Arrest every year in USA• Over 700 thousand people havecardiac arrest every year inEurope• 280 000 die every year in USA• 275 000 are treated every yearby EMT`s in Europe
  • 4. This are our Goals• To make efficientcourses• To have an efficient,reliable, cheap methodof evaluation• To have long term highretention rate
  • 5. How?• We have built a micro-websitefor testing and data collectionwww.osmu.ro/testare• We used an web based emailservice (www.mailchimp.com) forcommunication• We’ve made standard tests forour students which we used toevaluate them on different timeintervals• We’ve followed the ILCOR andERC guidelines
  • 6. 2 LotsMarisiensis 2011• 25 dentistry students• BLS plus elements of ALS• Theoretic Course, Practicewith instructors anddemonstration, One daytrainingVolunteers• 78 appliances for the Course• 50 graduating the course• 18 medical students,3 MD’s,29other• Theoretic course, Practice withinstructors and demo(2days),Work practice with apredefined tasks.
  • 7. What we did?Marisiensis:• We’ve tested them onpaper after course• Online 6 month, 1year, 2 yearsVolunteers:• We’ve tested them onpaper pre-course,after-course• Online 6 months, 1year• 2 years still to comein November
  • 8. Average correct response rate092.175.5 78.8 78.3609389 86.500102030405060708090100Marisiensis 2011Volunteers
  • 9. But…• We had low responserates• Volunteer lot: 36-40%• Marisiensis 2011: 20-28%
  • 10. Conclusions• We teach very efficient BLS courses over 92% averagein post-Course testing• For those who participate in the Volunteer trainingprogram Retention Rate Loss is insignificant even after1 year• For the Marisiensis Lot the lost of information wassignificant at 6 months time but didn`t change evenafter 2 years• We could pinpoint the exact information that wasn`ttransmitted correctly
  • 11. We are good at teaching
  • 12. And some other aspects• Although online evaluation ischeap, reliable, efficient we still have to find outhow to make people to collaborate• All evaluations have to personalized so adatabase with all of our students should be thenext step• Over 50-60% response rate would be moreacceptable
  • 13. The End

Related Documents