Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006 Recovery of Chemicals from Pressmud – ...
Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006Pressmud ...
Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006 Table 4 : Recoeries from Pressmud ...
Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006References ...
of 4

Pressmud chemicals recovery

Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Published in: Business      Technology      
Source: www.slideshare.net


Transcripts - Pressmud chemicals recovery

  • 1. Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006 Recovery of Chemicals from Pressmud – A Sugar Industry Waste N. Partha and V Sivasubramanian . Department of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600 025 Paper received : 11.4.06 Revised paper accepted: 19.7.06Indian sugarcane crop cultivation forms an important part of industry has been equally impressive. The distilleriesthe Indian agricultural economy. Production of sugar has in their turn have led to the increased availability ofshown a phenomenal increase in the last 65 years. One of effluent, commonly termed as ‘spent wash’. Thethe byproducts of sugar industry is pressmud, a solid residue, major waste products from sugar processing andobtained from sugarcane juice before crystallization of sugar. alcohol manufacture are:Generally pressmud is used as manure in India. The aim ofthe present investigation is to recover protein, sugar and wax 1. Cane residues left in the field after canefrom pressmud. The amount of protein is estimated to be harvesting.3.3%. The percentage of sugar is about 0.8%. Extraction of 2. Bagasse from the cane crushing operation.wax by solvent has resulted in a recovery of about 12%. 3. Pressmud from the cane juice filtration. 4. Spent wash from distilleries.T he two main sources of sucrose are the Bagasse finds profitable use in the paper sugarcane and the sugar beet. Sugarcane industry for the manufacture of wrapping and is tall grass having a number of bamboo-like packing. Certain mills also manufacture paper bystems, which grows to a height of 4 meters or more. employing suitable blends of conventional pulp withThe sugar content in sugarcane is about 10 to 15 per that obtained from bagasse. Its use is encouraged bycent. As regards the sugar beet, the juice of the beet the government by providing subsidies to thecontains sugar identical to that found in cane. The manufacturers. Bagasse is also extensively used as asugar beet is found to contain 5 to 6 per cent of convenient source of fuel in mill boilers, oftensucrose. In improved varieties, a yield of 13 to 17 resulting in availability of excess energy. The otherpercent is common and in this respect it compares cane residues could probably double the amount offavourably with sugarcane. [1] energy availability. Table 2 describes the number of factories in operation, their crushing capacity, area,Indian Scenario yield, cane and sugar production since the inceptionCane crop cultivation and production of sugar has of sugar industry and their contribution to the Indianshown a phenomenal increase in India over the last economy.60 years, since the industry started in an organizedmanner [2]. The detailed figures are given in Table1. Table 2 : Factories in Operation The increase in sugarcane and sugar production Sugarcane From 36 million tons inhas inevitably resulted in increased quantity of waste 1930 to 296 millionproducts. It is well known that molasses has found tonnes in 1999.very useful applications in the manufacture of Yield per hectare From 31 tons in 1930 to 72.5 tonnes in1999.ethanol and potable spirits. The growth of this Area under cultivation From 1.2 million Table 1 : Cane Crop Cultivation hectares in 1930 to 4.1 million hectares in Sugarcane From 35M tonnes in 1930 to 1999. 296M tonnes in 1999. No. of sugar industries 550 Yield/hectare From 31 tonnes/hectare in 1930 Total cane production 220 million tonnes per to 72.5 tonnes/hectare in 1999. year. Area under cultivation From 1.2M hectares in 1930 to Total cane available fro crushing 135 million tonnes per 4.1M hectares in 1999. year. Sugar production From 0.1M tonnes in 1930 to Total sugar production 13.5 million tonnes per 15.5M tonnes in 1999. year.160
  • 2. Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006Pressmud free from all pathogens, harmful bacteria, weedsPressmud from the sugar mills is a very useful source and seeds. Fertilizer is free flowing, easy toof fertilizer as well as some chemicals. The major handle, to pack and transport. The biocompostuse that has recently been developed in India is in contains 25-30% organic carbon, 1.2-2.0%biocomposting (usually trade named as Bioearth) nitrogen, 1.5-2.0% phosphorous and 2.5-3.0%where it is treated with the spent wash from the potash.distillery [3]. The composition of pressmud is given The shortcoming of this operation is the limitedin Table 3. Its usefulness as fertilizer is based on the period of operation of sugar plants. The pressmudnutrient content of the mud and the spent wash as has to be stored in large open areas and large lagoonsshown below: are to be set up to store the spent wash. However, Pressmud – N- 1.15 to 3.0%; P- 0.60 to 3.50% the long-term effects of application of this fertilizer and K- 0.30 to 1.80%. remain to be studied. Spent wash – N-2630 mg/l; P- 201 mg/l and Chemicals from Pressmud K- 222 mg/l. Pressmud can be a useful source of chemicals. Work The bio-compost is produced by spraying spent has been done at the laboratories of the Annawash on stacks of pressmud called windrows. The University at Chennai to recover the chemicals. It isperiod required to produce usable fertilizer varies to be noted that the total quantity of pressmud fromwith the process used. A typical 45-day process the sugar industry in India could be as much as 35,000includes the following steps: tonnes per day. [4]1. Formation of windrows and reduction of moisture Experimental content from 70% to 50% in five days. Recovery of Protein2. Inoculation of microbial culture. Protein being soluble in water, double distilled water3. Spraying of spent wash and homogenization of was used to separate it from pressmud. Protein was windrows for 30 days. separated from aqueous phase by precipitation with4. Maturation period of 10 days to reduce moisture ammonium salts. A Hitachi, U-2000, double beam to 30%. UV visible spectrophotometer was used to measureThe benefits that accrue are: the absorbance. Estimation of protein was done by1. Very low power requirement. Lowry’s method using sodium carbonate, sodium2. Zero discharge to inland water resourses and potassium tartarate and ammonium salts. freedom from river or ground water pollution. Recovery of Sugar3. Organic fertilizer produced is rich in micro- Sugar left in the aqueous phase after the recovery of nutrients and can reduce the requirement of proteins was recovered by evaporation. A Hitachi, chemical fertilizers. It also provides bacteria for U-2000, double beam UV visible spectrophotometer nitrogen fixing, solubilisation of phosphates, was used to measure the absorbance of the sugar humus that will keep the soil healthy and solution using anthrone reagent. develop the self-reclamation cycle. Recovery of Wax Since biocomposting is accompanied by a rise in Several solvents such as benzene, toluene and hexane temperature, chances are that the fertilizer is were tried for recovery of wax from the solids left behind after the recovery of proteins and sugar. Crude wax was separated from the wax-laden solvent by Table 3 : Composition of Pressmud deep freezing. Crude wax 5-14% Results Fiber 15-30% Effect of pH on Protein Recovery Crude Protein 5-15% The percentage recovery of protein, sugar and wax Sugar 5-15% from pressmud is given in Table 4. The amount of SiO 4-10% protein present in pressmud was about 3.3%. The CaO 1-4% percentage recoveries of protein at different pH levels PO 1-3% are shown in Table 5. From the table, it was found MgO 0.5-1.5% that percentage recovery of protein increased as pH Total ash 9-10% of the pressmud solution increased. The maximum amount of protein, i.e., 3.3% was recovered at a pH 161
  • 3. Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006 Table 4 : Recoeries from Pressmud 3 Protein 3.3 % Sugar 0.8 % 2 E (g) Wax 12 % Table 5 : Percentage Recovery of Protein 1 0 . 1 m m p a r t i c le pH %protein 0 . 5 m m p a r t i c le 5.5 2.59 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 6.0 2.62 Time (min) 7.0 3.00 Fig. 1 : Extraction of Wax by Solvent Toluene 8.0 3.13 2 8.5 3.30of 8.5. The sugar left after the separation of proteins E (g)was recovered by evaporation. The percentage of 1sugar was about 0.8% in pressmud.Model for Wax Recovery 0.1 mm particleThe wax recovered from pressmud was about 12%. 0.5 mm particle 0It had a melting point of 79°C and a density of 0.96. 0 100 200 300 400 500The following mathematical expression was used to Time (min)model the recovery of wax [5] : Fig. 2 : Extraction of Wax by Solvent Toluene and Benzene E=Emax θ/(θ+k) ... 1 4Where, Emax and k are characteristic constants for 3given system, q represents the time of extraction andE represents the weight of wax. Fig. 1-3 show the E (g) 2recovery of wax in weight (g) as time proceeds usingthe solvents toluene, toluene and benzene (50%) and 1hexane, respectively. The maximum recovery of wax 0.1 mm particle(0.1 mm particle size) was 2.7, 1.58 and 2.9 using 0.5 mm particle 0toluene, toluene and benzene (50%) and hexane 0 100 200 300 400 500respectively. The maximum recovery of wax (0.5 mm Time (min)particle size) was 1.2, 1.64 and 2.78 using toluene, Fig. 3 :Extraction of Wax by Solvent Hexanetoluene and benzene (50%) and hexane respectively.The maximum quantity of wax was recovered by Conclusionusing hexane as solvent. The results are reported inTable 6. In conclusion, one could positively derive wealth from the sugarcane and sugar industry wastes. Studies are Table 6 : Emax and Values also done to model the Indian sugar industry with precise mathematical approaches and to forecast its SYSTEM Emax (g) K (min) performance in future. The amount of protein was Toluene (0.1 mm) 6.67 0.17 estimated to be 3.3%. The percentage of sugar was about 0.8%. Extraction of wax by solvent resulted in Toluene (0.5 mm) 3.33 0.17 a recovery of about 12%. Toluene + Benzene (0.1 mm) 4.00 0.56 Toluene + Benzene (0.5 mm) 2.50 0.25 Acknowledgement Hexane (0.1 mm) 7.23 0.8 The authors acknowledge with thanks the South Indian Sugar Research Foundation for providing pressmud and other sample Hexane (0.5 mm) 3.87 0.79 materials for carrying out this investigation.162
  • 4. Indian Chemical Engr. Section A, Vol. 48, No.3, July-Sept. 2006References 4. Partha, N., and Krishnan, M.R.V.,: Pressmud for1. Hogot, E.,: Handbook of Cane Sugar Engineering, 3rd Chemicals/fine chemicals, Kisan World.27, 11:35, (2000). completely revised ed., Elsevier Publishing Company, NY, 5. Jacobs, M.B., and Scheflan, L.,: Chemical Analysis of U.S.A., (1986). Industrial Solvents, Interscience publishers, New York,2. Mathur, R.B.L.,: Handbook of Cane Sugar Technology, 1 st U.S.A., (1953). print, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, Nomenclature India, (1975). Emax Characteristic constant for given system3. Padmanabhan, P Rakkiyappan, P and Alexander, K.C.,: ., ., k Characteristic constant for given system Enrichment of Pressmud by Microorganisms, Sugarcane q Time of extraction, min Breeding Institute Extension, Publication No.39, (1993). E Weight of wax, gAPPENDIXEstimation of Protein Estimation of SugarEstimation of protein was done by Lowry’s method. For estimation of sugar, anthrone reagent was used.The principle behind the method is the aromatic The concentration of sugar was estimated with theamino acids, tyrosine and trytophan present in the help of a spectrophotometer.protein reacts with Folin-Phenol reagent (contains Estimation of Waxphosphomolybdic acid and tungstate) and produce adark blue colour. The reagents prepared were sodium After the removal of proteins and sugar from thecarbonate solution, sodium potassium tartarate aqueous solutions, the remaining wax was repeatedlysolution and Folin-Phenol reagent. Standard protein extracted with solvent hexane. Crude wax wassolution was pipetted out into clean test tubes. separated from the wax laden solvent by chilling. TheReagents were mixed and the blue colour at 650 nm resulting wax was dried and weighed. The meltingwas read in a spectrophotometer. From the standard point of wax was found to be 79°C and specific gravitygraph, the concentration of unknown was obtained. 0.96. 163

Related Documents