Press Release Study IR 2.0
Press release (English) regarding the international benchmarking study "Investor relations on the social web" 2011
Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Transcripts - Press Release Study IR 2.0
Institute of Communication and Media Studies Department Communication Management and Public Relations Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfass Telephone: +49-341-97-35040 Telefax: +49-341-97-35049 E-Mail: email@example.com Website: www.communicationmanagement.de Office: Burgstr. 21, D-04109 Leipzig, GermanyPress Release (August 19, 2011)Investor relations and social media: Deficiencies of online financialcommunications revealedInternational IR 2.0 benchmark study by the University of LeipzigFinancial markets experience turbulent times. An atmosphere of high uncertainty is prevalentamong investors and other stakeholders within the financial community. Even more, the amountof information and rumor distributed is increased by the internet and especially social media.Listed companies are facing the challenge of engaging in a digital dialogue to (re-) buildreputation and gain trust in a highly volatile communication environment. An empirical studyconducted by the University of Leipzig shows how companies in the United States, Germany,United Kingdom, France, and Japan master investor relations on the Web 2.0. By introducinga framework for financial communications and social media, the study analyzes company-owned investor relations websites as well as the use of Twitter, Facebook, YouTube andSlideShare for IR purposes. A content analysis embraced the 150 largest companies listed inDJIA, DAX, FTSE, CAC, and Nikkei. The study did reveal usage patterns and identified tools,topics, intensity of use, dialogical approaches and functions. Full results are available athttp://www.slideshare.net/communicationmanagement.The study highlighted a lack of consistent strategies towards online financial communications.Investor relations 2.0 is already practiced, especially on corporate investor relations websites.However, listed companies rather stick to their traditional instruments and upload presentationsfrom investor conferences, analyst meetings, or conference calls. Dialogical approaches likeblogs, chats, or other ones, which offer the possibility for feedback, are growing inimportance. However, these instruments are still nascent. IR professionals are even morecautious when considering external social media platforms like Twitter or Facebook. Socialmedia are mostly used for information purposes and not for interacting online withshareholders or intermediaries. There are significant differences between various countries andstock indices. Whereas French and UK businesses were more involved in interpretation viasocial media, Japanese blue chips solely referred to the information function. Businesses in theUnited States clearly led the field with a broad and functionally balanced social mediaengagement (see table 1).
2 Country-specific characteristics of investor relations 2.0 No. of Social media Stock Average companies Statistical parameter function index (M) (N) SD F p DAX 30 1.30 0.651 3.806 0.006 DJIA 30 1.47 0.681 Information FTSE 30 1.10 0.607 CAC 30 0.87 0.507 NIKKEI 30 1.33 0.802 DAX 30 0.67 0.661 3.266 0.013 DJIA 30 0.63 0.718 Structuring FTSE 30 0.47 0.776 CAC 30 0.43 0.568 NIKKEI 30 0.13 0.434 DAX 30 1.07 0.450 10.758 <0.001 DJIA 30 1.33 0.711 Interpretation FTSE 30 1.23 0.504 CAC 30 0.97 0.414 NIKKEI 30 0.50 0.572 DAX 30 0.50 0.861 16.616 <0.001 DJIA 30 1.00 0.743 Networking FTSE 30 0.10 0.305 CAC 30 0.10 0.305 NIKKEI 30 0.03 0.183DAX = Germany, DJIA = USA, FTSE = United Kingdom, CAC = France, NIKKEI = Japan.Basic functions of social software according to Zerfaß & Sandhu, 2008: information (e.g., RSS feeds), structuring (e.g., social bookmarks, wikis),interpretation (e.g., podcasts, video casts, and blogs) and networking (e.g., social communities). Category in content analysis: Degree to whicheach function is fulfilled: 3 = fully applicable (to 100 per cent appropriate), 2 = largely applicable (to 50-75 per cent appropriate), 1 = partly ap-plicable (to 25-50 per cent appropriate), 0 = not applicable (to 0 per cent appropriate). N = 150 (category analyzed for companies using socialmedia on the IR website). Average = mean score; SD = standard deviation; F = F-ratio for one-way ANOVA F-test statistic. Results significant for p< 0.05. Rounded figures. Significant differences between groups (here: indices) according to social media functions found. Post hoc tests revealedfurther insights, see Koehler (2011).Source: “Investor relations 2.0 –An international benchmark study“ / www.communicationmanagement.de / © University of Leipzig 2011“Keeping in mind that this research focused on international blue chips, the full potential ofsocial media within financial communications remains idle,” said Ansgar Zerfass, professor forcommunication management at Leipzig University. “While investor relations officers are notallowed to announce more or other information than already published in mandatoryinformation and via traditional distribution channels, web 2.0 channels enable them to get in
3contact with potential or actual investors, especially private ones by using the tools mostsuitable to their needs”.Kristin Koehler, expert researcher in investor relations and project leader for the study at theUniversity of Leipzig, added: “Web 2.0 offers the possibility of greater transparency,interaction with a broader public, and new stakeholders. Best practices identified in the studyshow that excellent investor relations 2.0 is possible. Several blue chips in the United Statesand Germany demonstrate the range of possibilities for interactive communication in an areawhere information is very sensible.” Table 2 shows the top ten ranking of listed companiesworldwide regarding their investor relations 2.0 engagement on their IR websites as well as onTwitter, Facebook, YouTube and SlideShare. Obviously, companies listed in the DJIA and DAXoutperform other stock indices. Further research is necessary to identify the drivers for thesedifferences, which might be found in the realm of national cultures, professional role-takingand market structures. Ranking Investor Relations 2.0Ranking 2011 Ranking 2010 Company Country Index 1 5 Cisco Systems Inc. USA DJIA 2 1 General Electric Co. USA DJIA 3 2 SAP AG D DAX 4 7 Hewlett-Packard Co. USA DJIA 5 22 AT&T Inc. USA DJIA 6 10 Intel Corp. USA DJIA 7 3 Alcoa Inc. USA DJIA 8 23 Bayer AG D DAX 9 12 Daimler AG D DAX 10 27 BASF SE D DAXRanking according to indices, based on content analyses of financial communications utilizing corporate websites and external platforms (Twitter,Youtube, Facebook, SlideShare) by corporations listed in the USA, UK, France, Germany and Japan (DJIA, FTSE, CAC, DAX, NIKKEI), N = 150.Source: “Investor relations 2.0 –An international benchmark study” / www.communicationmanagement.de / © University of Leipzig 2011Background: The Institute of Communication and Media Science, Department ofCommunication Management and Public Relations, at the University of Leipzig in Germany is arecognized leader of research and education in corporate communications in Europe. Morethan 70 books and 300 journal articles / chapters have been published by the professors. Themaster program in communication management offered by the institute has been rankednumber one in Germany in 2010. Research in online communications is conducted on a
4national as well as international level and comprises empirical studies dealing with topics asfinancial communication, multimedia communication, and social media governance, as well astheoretical considerations that combine communication science and management research.Further information:Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfass, Tel. +49 341 97 35040, E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.orgKristin Koehler M.A., Tel. +49 173 9801555, E-Mail: email@example.com